Comments: 128
bsq2phat In reply to Placeperry [2011-08-11 11:06:10 +0000 UTC]
um, i don't know. i dont think they *have* names. this is the corner of 7th and 42nd street but next time i'm in times square i'll ask someone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SLPdomain [2009-01-24 01:26:26 +0000 UTC]
i did this with a fisheye !//
wOw
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bluntvayne [2008-08-07 18:50:58 +0000 UTC]
Mmm I've passed by this city and I've never seen it viewed like this before, you have an eye for architectures and how it's considered art itself
You are a great photographer
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gadgetguy606 [2008-05-20 17:23:59 +0000 UTC]
This has been featured in my journal!!!
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bsq2phat In reply to gadgetguy606 [2008-05-29 13:02:55 +0000 UTC]
sorry for the late reply but thanks, its very much appreciated.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bydnam [2008-04-29 07:39:45 +0000 UTC]
Great HDR shot
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dkm2350 [2008-04-11 10:42:22 +0000 UTC]
Congratz!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
s-l-e-e-p-y-h-e-a-d In reply to bsq2phat [2008-04-04 12:02:30 +0000 UTC]
You deserves it! I like that perspective, most than a great shot! Congrats!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CollegeSpirit17 [2008-04-03 02:05:15 +0000 UTC]
is this a fish-eye lense?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bsq2phat In reply to CollegeSpirit17 [2008-04-03 13:10:34 +0000 UTC]
yes it was the tokina 'zoom' fisheye lens. it was a bit cheaper than a dedicated fisheye.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WyNter-CoRe [2008-04-01 05:03:05 +0000 UTC]
very nice! Well done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
indi-is-conan [2008-04-01 04:59:54 +0000 UTC]
awesome shot, I love that you can read the signs and the reflection of the sun is awesome too!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JRd1st [2008-03-31 16:42:19 +0000 UTC]
Woah! This is totally awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
htmlRullezd00d [2008-03-31 16:11:34 +0000 UTC]
loved the perspective!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
raiawoman [2008-03-31 01:39:12 +0000 UTC]
Love the perspective!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
morbid-picasso [2008-03-31 01:16:26 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful perspective!! It makes me feel so small and insignificant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pantsonnos [2008-03-30 22:48:44 +0000 UTC]
what lens? super wide or fisheye?
great shot, black and white looks great
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bsq2phat In reply to pantsonnos [2008-03-31 13:53:24 +0000 UTC]
it was taken with the tokina 'zoom' 10-17mm fisheye. at 10mm it looks and acts like a true fisheye but when you zoom in it gets slightly less fishy. not sure what i had it set to tho when i took the photo.
and thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pantsonnos In reply to bsq2phat [2008-03-31 21:00:18 +0000 UTC]
thanks for that, is 10 much wider than 17mm?
i like landscape photography and have a 17-50 and was wondering whether i should invest in a 10-22 or similar
Cheers
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bsq2phat In reply to pantsonnos [2008-04-01 00:17:58 +0000 UTC]
if you do landscape you definitely should invest in a wide angle lens 10 will look significantly wider than 17
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pantsonnos In reply to bsq2phat [2008-04-01 07:20:52 +0000 UTC]
thanks for the tip
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bsq2phat In reply to pantsonnos [2008-04-03 14:30:08 +0000 UTC]
no prob. i hopeit helps.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pantsonnos In reply to bsq2phat [2008-04-03 20:58:33 +0000 UTC]
it does just need the money now
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>