HOME | DD
bunnystick — Commish21: Admcewen
Published: 2009-03-30 17:50:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 3672; Favourites: 92; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Commission: 21: Full Color, Full Body, Single CharacterBuyer: *admcewen
Comments: Elsbeth Kwong, badass tiefling (ADnD 4.0 edition). My style seems to be coming along nicely as it has had time to go through a little tweeking since my last commissions. Lemme know if you dig it!
Medium: Pencil vs. Paper, Micron Markers, and Photoshop
Interested in a commission like this one? Well then hit me up!:
Note me on Deviantart! Email me at: bunnystick(at)gmail(dot)com! IM me on AOL Instant Messenger: The Bunnystick Message me on MSN Messenger: bunnystyck@comcast.net
Related content
Comments: 32
Amazing!
She is so gonna be my next DnD character!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's amazing news! Hehe
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ooo, I like it lots :3
something about the textured look works very well
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Your work is always refreshing and it always makes me smile. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
great work!
I can always tell if it's a pic you did! I really love your style <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is beautiful! I love the details, and you certainly captured "badass."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is thoroughly awesome...you get better all the time. Her horns are the best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
haha, 4.0 tieflings are red? ew.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Don't worry their not, check out William OConnors work on 4th ED including ironically the referance pic. Some pictures in 4th ed have shown them with a red tinge but not many.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yeah... I don't like how they sort of pigeon-holed them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
the new tieflings are such a sore thumb, good luck with them sneaking into a town. thats for sure.. i'ma stickin with the Farrin 3.5 tieflings.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They're really a completely different kind of tiefling though too.
Their like an entire race, not just a rare occurence.
Oh, and they're no longer from demon stock.
They're a race descended from humans who were part of a corrupt empire that made deals with the devils, and now every time they reproduce, no matter with what race, the offspring is a tiefling...
It's just kind of silly if you ask me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
takes the fun and uniqueness out of the tiefling. mandatory features? what bull. and 4.0 STILL doesn't have a monk yet, not to mention they thought that it was a good idea to finally come out with the freggin barbarian and sorcerer NOW and not when the first 4.0 PHB came out
maybe they should have had a complete product before they put it out and took away 3.5 books. there are just some classes inherit to the whole fantasy genre they up and ignored when they came out with the first edition of their new system. lazy rushed and ugh... they even recycle old pictures from old 3.0 books! ridiculous that when people asked things like "where is my barbarian?" they simply gave an air of "just be paitent and throw out your 3.5 books while you wait."
i'll keep my money and my 3.5 thank you very much WotC. so there
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol, sounds like a plan to me I guess.
I have to admit I really hated it until I actually played it. The game mechanics make things actually fun again, lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ah but if play in a campaign like Elsbeth here who is from Eberron all of that (and I agree with you here) background rubbish is ignored and the race is adapted to fit into the setting. I also believe that they will still be a rare race in Eberron as well, and still desended from Demons. So theres no reason you can't do the same in your own setting, to be honest I've always ignored background from the PHB's except where it's relevent to where I'm playing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh, yeah. In my setting, they're all descendents of mortals who were tempted into having affairs with agents of asmodeus (which would become succubi and inccubi once his treachery was discovered) (actually the direct offspring became cambions, and they parented tieflings)
So the background is much the same as it used to be (adjusting now for the fact that succubi are now devils, which makes a lot more sense to me) except that it doesn't happen as often any more, it was much more common in the early days of the world, and it bears permanence on its descendants.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
As per usual, exquisitely done. I really, really love her tail. It's great, the very casual way it hangs behind her, the the 'fins' (i guess that's what you'd call them? xD; ) on the upperside of it are excellently done. I love the way they flop over with the tail, it just looks so realistic. o.o
The brow ridge of the horns is ingenious. With a lot of the 4.0 illustrated teiflings, the ridge-horns make the rest of the face looks sorta... deformed. It's just really pleasing to see a 4e tiefling who's still quite the looker, horns and all. xD
As a side note, since I've yet to find a place in my head for the 4.0 rules to settle, are tiefling's tails still prehensile? Completely unrelated musings right there, but i could help but ask. xD;
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
not in 4.0 no. but depending on dm i'm sure you can put a feat in there that makes them prehensile. like, training the tail or something. i'm sure my dm would let me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I suppose it's not a game-breaking ability, true. xD Something to ponder, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
According to the rules no, but theres no reason why you can't keep them prehensile for roleplaying purposes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Agreed. I only ask because i remember in 3.5 it specifically saying their tails were prehensile, so i was just curious. xD
4.0 is still so confusing to me. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Keep trying, trust me it's worth it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
