HOME | DD

CaciqueCaribe — Iran North Korea Missile Tests - Any Protests?

Published: 2017-02-01 11:37:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 605; Favourites: 9; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Eleven long range missile tests took place in Iran from the time Obama concluded his treaty with them until this past December.   Yet mainstream media kept most of this hush hush.  This past Sunday Iran conducted its first test during the new US Administration.

So, where are all the protesters asking for action against Iran, and asking to revoke a treaty that Iran has already violated TWICE in the last two months?  Does it bother any of them that this was done in partnership with North Korea, who now has nuclear warheads?  

What are they protesting this week*?  Apparently nothing as important as this.

www.independent.co.uk/news/wor…

* I guess whatever Soros wants them to protest and disrupt:
www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/libe…
Related content
Comments: 26

uygfniudrugyeruh [2018-02-02 02:40:07 +0000 UTC]

 
We're not gonna have to worry for a lonng time

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to uygfniudrugyeruh [2018-02-02 04:45:30 +0000 UTC]

Several have flown right over Japan in just these last two years.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

uygfniudrugyeruh In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2018-02-02 15:00:10 +0000 UTC]

Are you really that scared



I heard all their jets broke down and down and now have to use bi-planes from the first world war


So are really sure that North Korean missiles will maintain their already shitty quality

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fmr0 [2017-08-16 22:34:42 +0000 UTC]

A crazy commie and a rabid islamist  are joining their efforts to destroy the free world...

What do you think the union against nature of two monsters is supposed to produce?
A sheer abomination!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SethsEye [2017-02-10 17:31:37 +0000 UTC]

But both nations are allies of Russia and China. I don't think there is a chance in hell we will do anything against either of them. Unless we want to spark a world war, which surely would follow. Does seem the Eastern world is putting it's pieces in place, doesn't it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wertyla [2017-02-02 20:10:44 +0000 UTC]

So, who's getting nuked first: America or Israel... and which country is going to do it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to Wertyla [2017-02-02 20:14:21 +0000 UTC]

Here's a quick glimpse into their mindset:

shiaking.deviantart.com/art/20…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wertyla In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2017-02-12 04:16:21 +0000 UTC]

So, Iran wants to bomb Israel? I wonder if they'll actually succeed... What do you think of Biblical prophesy, by the way? I admit that I could be misinterpreting, but descriptions of the End Times in the Bible mention "the abomination of desolation in the holy land". Hmm... I'm not sure what that could mean, but Israel getting nuked seems like a possibility. Again, I could be wrong.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to Wertyla [2017-02-12 04:47:33 +0000 UTC]

The scary thing is that many Muslims are coming to believe in their own End Times prophesies:

comments.deviantart.com/1/5862…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wertyla In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2017-02-14 13:24:59 +0000 UTC]

It looks like they've been wanting to rid the world of infidels for a while, though... My school actually never taught about the Crusades, but I found an interesting article online recently that suggests that maybe the Christian Crusaders weren't all totally evil and the Muslims actually started the conflict (and even thought they had won and that their oppenents were wimps until people like Bill Clinton came along and convinced them that they were victims of the evil white Christian infidels): home.isi.org/you-thought-crusa…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

STiX2000 [2017-02-01 19:20:39 +0000 UTC]

Agitators?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to STiX2000 [2017-02-01 19:35:44 +0000 UTC]

By agitators I mean general citizens - on both sides, mind you - who kept trying to equate election results with an imminent nuclear threat with Russia.  It was as if putting on blinders, overlooking other serious threats from what seemed like lesser players.

Rogue states are, well, rogue, and not concerned with sanctions and condemnations from the international community.  As such they are highly unpredictable and dangerous.  They don't have to possess an arsenal of nukes to create havoc in the area, specially now at a time when the area doesn't need any additional tension.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

STiX2000 In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2017-02-01 19:41:28 +0000 UTC]

Are you trying to say Iran is a Rogue state???... Iran hasn't attacked another country in over 200 years.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to STiX2000 [2017-02-01 19:45:19 +0000 UTC]

See my definition of rogue above.

Except by proxies, North Korea hasn't attacked anyone in quite some time either.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

STiX2000 In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2017-02-01 19:57:31 +0000 UTC]

I read your definition above but that does not change the fact that Iran has not attacked another country in over 200 years.

Here's Oxford definition of rogue state:

"rogue state

noun


A nation or state regarded as breaking international law and posing a threat to the security of other nations."

Now does that describe Iran or the US more accurately?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to STiX2000 [2017-02-01 20:34:33 +0000 UTC]

Which one does that definition match?  Take your pick.  It all depends on which side of the fence you sit and whose propaganda you're listening to.

But I already answere why I happened to use the term rogue ("not concerned with sanctions and condemnations from the international community"), and of those two nations I think Iran is the least willing to consider international sanctions and condemnations when making decisions.

Your feelings about that might differ of course.  And I have no problem with that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

STiX2000 In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2017-02-03 15:33:57 +0000 UTC]

Well which country hasn't attacked another country in over 200 years and which country routinely attacks other countries?.. seems pretty clear cut to me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fanfics4ever [2017-02-01 19:15:53 +0000 UTC]

...we're doomed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ostendfaxpest [2017-02-01 19:07:23 +0000 UTC]

I want attention! Thats the meaning.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to ostendfaxpest [2017-02-01 19:40:21 +0000 UTC]

I hope you're right and that's all this means.  I hope it's not something else:

shiaking.deviantart.com/art/20…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OnlyTheGhosts [2017-02-01 13:40:39 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

stalkerboy808 In reply to OnlyTheGhosts [2017-02-01 16:24:42 +0000 UTC]

Don't forget South Korea being a US Ally. Regardless aside from Nukes, the South Koreans can take on North Korea since they are an advanced army relying on state-of-the-art weapons and technology, I mean it would be a cake walk for the South Koreans like the American Invasion of Iraq and the Gulf War with how the Iraqi Army got steamrolled by Coalition Forces. 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYr-70… ;

I mean the North Koreans rely on antique Weapons that are outdated. I mean imagine a Tank battle, the South Korean Army having Strong Heavily Armored Tank whereas for North Korean Tanks, their armor is like Paper.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to stalkerboy808 [2017-02-01 17:49:14 +0000 UTC]

Wow.  That would be a mess.  China would have to pick a side if that happened.  They wouldn't sit it out for long.  It would be just like in the 50s.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stalkerboy808 In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2017-02-01 20:34:20 +0000 UTC]

Not only that but North Korea can't even feed its army, let alone give them enough ammunition to fight the South Korean and American Forces. I mean North Korean Soldiers are short and stubby compared to American and South Korean Troops. I mean the North Korean Army is primitive compared to the technologically advanced South Korean Army. 

att.x2.hiapk.com/forum/month_1…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to stalkerboy808 [2017-02-01 20:42:36 +0000 UTC]

Never underestimate an enemy ... any enemy, specially one that has been brainwashed to believe that every shortage and suffering in their country is due to foreign pressure and not their own psychotic leaders.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CaciqueCaribe In reply to OnlyTheGhosts [2017-02-01 13:50:45 +0000 UTC]

Obama giving them money and uranium obviously didn't help one bit.  It only encouraged them further.

www.dailywire.com/news/12249/o…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OnlyTheGhosts In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2017-02-01 14:22:53 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to OnlyTheGhosts [2017-02-01 17:47:13 +0000 UTC]

Oh absolutely!  

And we'll be paying for their mistakes for many years to come.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0