HOME | DD

CaciqueCaribe — Would You Accept Donations From Sharia Governments

#hillaryclinton #sharia #hillaryclinton2016 #hillary2016
Published: 2016-06-26 17:22:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 2319; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description www.cnn.com/2015/01/21/middlee…
abcnews.go.com/US/saudi-arabia…
investmentwatchblog.com/media-…

Modern governments under SHARIA LAW call for women and young girls to be LEGALLY segregated, enslaved, sold, beaten, lashed, raped, mutilated, stoned, beheaded and burned alive on a daily basis and in alarming numbers.  This is specially worse for women considered to be of the wrong ethnicities and religions.  Gays are hanged, beaten to death or stoned.  The daily lives of so many of them are true lives of terror, with no one to speak for them or fight for them. 

A little sample of what Sharia Law includes:
www.americanthinker.com/articl…

So, if you are fully aware of those horrific laws and practices, would it bother you to accept huge donations from such governments, specially when they expect special favors in return?  When Hillary was Secretary of State, and she traveled the world on what should have been official government business, Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton didn't have any problem taking that money into their Foundation, in exchange for things that had been paid for by tax payers.  It was not only a win-win for them*, it was absolutely immoral.

* Actually a win-win-win.  The business was conducted on trips that were paid by tax dollars, the money went into the Foundation as tax exempt "charitable" donations, and the weapons delivered were again at the expense of tax payers.  No wonder all those illegal government transactions were conducted and documented on an illegal private server.

caciquecaribe.deviantart.com/a…
Related content
Comments: 43

Graeystone [2016-11-29 17:09:34 +0000 UTC]

Still trying to figure out the difference between 'legal free trade with China' and 'Hillary taking money from Saudis'.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to Graeystone [2016-12-04 02:53:15 +0000 UTC]

An old Jeffersonian quote:  "Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none"

Well, I learned long ago that there's no such thing as free money.  Some people buy goods with their money, some buy favors.  So when a candidate gets a huge sum of foreign cash designated for helping that candidate in their campaign, that becomes problematic.*

Even if that candidate's loyalties aren't compromised there is the little matter of the individual not exercising sufficient judgment, or feeling so beyond reproach, to avoid all appearance of impropriety.  It can get a bit "entangling".

* As I'm sure you know, for little people like you and me, "money for favors" is called bribery.

EDIT
PS.  I wonder how many huge foreign donations are coming into "The Foundation" now that she lost.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Graeystone In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2016-12-05 17:05:27 +0000 UTC]

One of my quotes - "Something is wrong when the US shuts out two communist nations(Cuba, Soviet Union when it existed) yet will still trade with a third(China)."

And it is true about money. The very first thing out of my high school economics teacher was, "There is no such thing as a free lunch." And yeah, it is bribery what you described. Its that blasted, "Do as I say, not as I do" mentality of Government. Oh, and get this, its legal for the US Legislative Branch to do Insider Trading.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to Graeystone [2016-12-05 17:10:49 +0000 UTC]

Well that's Jefferson's definition of tyranny, that which is legal for the members of government to do, but not legal for the governed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Graeystone In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2016-12-05 17:14:44 +0000 UTC]

Yep.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fmr0 [2016-11-28 18:31:45 +0000 UTC]

"Pecunia non olet"


For hellary, there is not such a concept as "dirty money".
Money is money, 
Her avidity is without limits.


"Where there's muck, there's brass, kiss my   "

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to fmr0 [2016-11-28 21:59:42 +0000 UTC]

That's a famous underworld saying too!  "Plata es plata y nunca apesta" is a Spanish one that I still hear once in a while.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 17:25:20 +0000 UTC]

Yet Trump has 8 registered companies in Saudi Arabia and has done a lot of business with them. But no focus on Hillary taking donations.

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

Balddog4 In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-29 02:11:38 +0000 UTC]

You talk like you know everything. Doing business is much more different from doing a charity organization. The Clinton Foundation is suppose to be a non-profit organization yet, the Clinton's did pretty shifty stuff. All of those millions went into the Clinton Foundation because Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State for the White House. Trump has NEVER held government offices until being Elected as President of the United States. Plus he never got money to do favors for people in foreign governments because he wasn't a government official. So tell me this, why would these foreign government officials give money to a charity organization, just because? Answer me that. And don't give me the obvious leftist answer "Because they believe in the charity work the Clinton Foundation does" bull crap. Because these countries don't give a damn about charity. All they care about is progress for them.

So give me an answer; Why these people were willing to give Millions upon Millions of dollars for an organization which the Secretary of State had control of?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to Balddog4 [2016-11-29 02:24:50 +0000 UTC]

"You talk like you know everything."

Well I do know a lot about politics.

" Doing business is much more different from doing a charity organization."

But they can both be used to influence people into doing what they want. Tell me, what's so different between Hillary taking in donations from the Saudis and Donald having the Saudis invest into his businesses? The Saudis are still paying them off into doing shit they want like more weapons deals or not going after them for their human rights violations. 

" The Clinton Foundation is suppose to be a non-profit organization yet, the Clinton's did pretty shifty stuff."

I'm sorry but what's the relevancy here? We're talking about Hillary and Donald gettin money from the Saudis, not what the Clinton's have done. I don't care what they've done in this situation, I'm talking about the Saudis buying off both of them.

"All of those millions went into the Clinton Foundation because Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State for the White House. "

Incorrect actually. You see, when you're in office you can't really run a foundation and still be in office. That's because of something called a conflict of interest. That's why Donald can't run his businesses while President because he could use his power to benefit himself. She did take money after leaving office, and during her run in the primaries and presidential race. But not while in office, she wasn't running her foundation at the time.

"Trump has NEVER held government offices until being Elected as President of the United States."

And? What's the point of bringing that up except to use it against him for his lack of experience. 

" Plus he never got money to do favors for people in foreign governments because he wasn't a government official."

You don't need to be a government official to get money from foreign governments dude. If a government invests money into your businesses like the Saudis are with Donald, you're still getting money from those foreign governments. 

" So tell me this, why would these foreign government officials give money to a charity organization, just because?"

Well it's a non-profit charity so you could argue it's for good PR. But it can also be used to influence a person's decision when they are in the runnings for office.

"And don't give me the obvious leftist answer "Because they believe in the charity work the Clinton Foundation does" bull crap. Because these countries don't give a damn about charity. All they care about is progress for them."

Alright then, answer me this without a trumptard answer: "Why would the Saudi government invest in Trump's businesses when he was just elected President? If they believed in his businesses why wait until after the election to invest?". 

"So give me an answer; Why these people were willing to give Millions upon Millions of dollars for an organization which the Secretary of State had control of?"

Is in control of, since she didn't get into office she can still control her foundation. The answer is to try and influence her, just like what they are trying to do with Trump by investing in his 8 businesses in Saudi Arabia. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Centurion030 In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 18:21:24 +0000 UTC]

Private citizen is not equal to public official using office for gain.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to Centurion030 [2016-11-28 18:27:24 +0000 UTC]

But Trump is now a public official who still has businesses in Saudi.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Centurion030 In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 18:31:02 +0000 UTC]

He is NOW, not prior.

Whatever, Jello.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to Centurion030 [2016-11-28 20:00:48 +0000 UTC]

He should still be considered a public official if he's running. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Centurion030 In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 20:05:28 +0000 UTC]

Well now, he wasn't then and you don't make up US code or law.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to Centurion030 [2016-11-28 20:21:38 +0000 UTC]

Neither do you. Hillary wasn't a public official when she was running, she left in 2013 to run her foundation. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Centurion030 In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 22:09:48 +0000 UTC]

But SHE was prior...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to Centurion030 [2016-11-28 22:23:39 +0000 UTC]

She was yes, but she didn't take in those donations when she was one prior, only after. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Centurion030 In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 22:25:36 +0000 UTC]

Right.....

www.justice.gov/jmd/do-it-righ…

Done with you. Between Wikileaks and her own hubris, she was toast.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ACommissionReviewer In reply to Centurion030 [2016-11-28 22:30:31 +0000 UTC]

You can't accept donations while in office, because that could lead to a conflict of interest. Which is why I pointed out that Trump has 8 businesses registered in Saudi Arabia because it doesn't seem like he's going to take the conflict of interest thing seriously and step down from the business but rather hand it over to his kids to manage.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CaciqueCaribe In reply to Centurion030 [2016-11-28 22:27:45 +0000 UTC]

Lol.  Reason escapes them.  If they ever really wanted it to begin with.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Centurion030 In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2016-11-28 22:30:12 +0000 UTC]

Very much so. The records show $$$ was being received prior to 2013.

It's very clear except for someone who thinks all is relative.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TakuraLion In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 18:00:09 +0000 UTC]

AT least he didn't take funding from Saudi Arabia for his campaign. he put his own money in his campaign and he knew how the game was played. That's how he won.
Hillary however, let people die when they called for help, was responsible for causing thousands of deaths because "hey lets attack these people because we're after one guy"
Hillary also is a constant liar, and believes that politicians should have a public and private figure. Meaning she thinks its ok to lie to the people and not tell them the truth.
Yeah Trump is so much worse than KILLARY amiright? Trump also supports the LGBT community, while Hillary doesn't. Has she even spoken a WORD about that community? Nope.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to TakuraLion [2016-11-28 20:15:01 +0000 UTC]

Oh boy this one will be interesting.

"AT least he didn't take funding from Saudi Arabia for his campaign. he put his own money in his campaign and he knew how the game was played. That's how he won. "
 
Actually he loaned money for his campgain, he didn't spend it. Basically he took money from his business, and then paid it back after the primaries were finished. He also only self funded his primary run, not his presidential run. In fact a lot of the people who donated to his campaign for president were then appointed by him like one of the women who he put on secretary of education (Betsy DeVos) donated $5.9 million. 

"Hillary however, let people die when they called for help"

I knew I was in for some stupid shit when you bring up Benghazi. Yes use a conspiricy theory that has been debunked hundreds of times in order to criticize Hillary. Totally doesn't make you look like an idiot.

"was responsible for causing thousands of deaths because "hey lets attack these people because we're after one guy" "

Are you talking about the Iraq invasion? Because she wasn't responsible for that, the GOP and Bush administration were. She supported it yes, but Trump also supported it. Along with that when she apologized for voting for the war, Trump denied ever supporting it even though he clearly did and was caught on tape saying he did in 2002. But you can't blame 1 person for the Iraq war, especially one person who only had a single vote amongst other senators.

"Hillary also is a constant liar"

So is Trump and he's a lot worse because when caught in his lie he'd just deny ever making the claim or try and defend his lie. Meanwhile Hillary will apologize for it because unlike Trump, she's shown to improve herself when she makes a mistake.

" and believes that politicians should have a public and private figure. Meaning she thinks its ok to lie to the people and not tell them the truth. "

What a weird way to just say "She's okay with lying".

" Yeah Trump is so much worse than KILLARY amiright?"

Yeah he is. 

"Trump also supports the LGBT community, while Hillary doesn't."

By support you mean state that he'd appoint a judge to the supreme court to vote against LGBT bills and try and undo gay marriage. Oh yes, he totally supports them. Do you say that because he tried to fear mongal the LGBT community into supporting him by saying he'd ban muslims from entering the US after the Orlando gay bar shooting?

"Has she even spoken a WORD about that community? Nope."

thinkprogress.org/clinton-figh…

Actually she has. This was a really dumb response from ya, I may consider including you on my STS 2016 list.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TakuraLion In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 20:42:35 +0000 UTC]

Bengazhi isn't a conspiracy theory, it's fact. And I guess all those deleted emails are 'conspiracy theories' as well huh? If that's the case then why was Hillary INVESTGATED for those horrible crimes? Why is she not in jail?
Because her family is corrupt, and is no better than a mafia. They don't call her family the CLINTON CRIME FAMILY for no good reason.

lmao you Hillary supporters are just still sad and crying like fucking BABIES because she lost, and Trump won fair and square. Then again half of the people crying didn't even fucking vote or were illegal voters. It's no wonder that the DNC was actually investigated by the FBI over this crap. The DNC has turned everything to SHIT, and you guys know it too. OR you don't know cause you're brainwashed by the government thinking that free handouts are good, and working and being self sufficient is bad.
Lets face it America has become real shitty since the democrats took over, and it's about time that those problems were fixed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to TakuraLion [2016-11-28 21:03:57 +0000 UTC]

"Bengazhi isn't a conspiracy theory, it's fact. "

No it isn't a fact, and learn how to spell Benghazi. She was investigated but there was nothing. In fact if you wanna blame someone for not sending more troops in, blame congress and the state department for not doing anything.

"And I guess all those deleted emails are 'conspiracy theories' as well huh?"

No she did delete emails, what was on the emails wasn't important enough to press criminal charges though.

" If that's the case then why was Hillary INVESTGATED for those horrible crimes? Why is she not in jail?"

*Investigated and just because she was investigated doesn't mean she was responsible for the crimes. It's just a method on ruling those out from innocent and the guilty and she wasn't guilty. 

"Because her family is corrupt, and is no better than a mafia."

Well now, that's a big stretch lol.

" They don't call her family the CLINTON CRIME FAMILY for no good reason. "

Only far right wing nuttards do.

"lmao you Hillary supporters are just still sad and crying like fucking BABIES because she lost, and Trump won fair and square."

Yet you guys were the ones who called for riots if Trump didn't win so y'all aren't that much better. Besides, we'll see if this recount actually happens. Along with that Hillary won the popular vote, so if this was a pure democratic election where the people decide on who wins than Hillary would've actually won.

". Then again half of the people crying didn't even fucking vote or were illegal voters."

Even though illegals can't vote and she won the popular vote. Why do you assume if illegals did vote they'd only vote democrat? 

" It's no wonder that the DNC was actually investigated by the FBI over this crap. The DNC has turned everything to SHIT, and you guys know it too. "

Ah yes, ignore everything Trump has said or done, only point the finger at the people you don't like. Very childish indeed, in fact judging by your writing I'd assume you were a child.

" OR you don't know cause you're brainwashed by the government thinking that free handouts are good, and working and being self sufficient is bad. "

I live in Canada, with single payer healthcare and it's working out really well. I don't know what you're talking about being self sufficient though, you need more context than that you dingus. I love how you claim I'm brainwashed by your government, yet I don't even live under your government. LOL! Shows how bash the far right is at accusing people of being "brainwashed" without even a second thought into whether or not it would make logical sense.

"Lets face it America has become real shitty since the democrats took over, and it's about time that those problems were fixed."

Ah yes, because it's not like the republicans were the ones that allowed the great recession happen, or the ones who brought the US into a 10 year unnecessary war that the democrats was finally getting the US out of, or the ones who're the most bought, or the ones who shut down the government, or the ones who rather than focus on real issues are more interested in pampering their backers with tax breaks for the rich. What a short list of what the democrats have done?

-Killed Osama
-Lowered taxes
-Paris Agreement
-Reformed Healthcare which let over 1 million Americans get health insurance
-The Iran Nuclear deal so the Iranians don't build anymore nukes
-Net neutrality
-gay marriage
-and so much more

Notice how a lot of the shit the democrats had to fix was caused by the Bush administration and the GOP. Now you guys elected someone not only dumber than Bush, but also a more corrupt party into power. Congrats, you fucked up.  


👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CaciqueCaribe In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 17:41:10 +0000 UTC]

Please tell me you don't think the two things are somehow the same.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2016-11-28 17:42:24 +0000 UTC]

Saudis invest in Trump's businesses.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 17:53:06 +0000 UTC]

And?  Anyone can.  It's business. But he was never a key public figure, much less held the nation's highest public servant position, until basically yesterday.

As a public servant, if I accept more than $10 dollars from anyone, I am already exposing myself to scrutiny and disciplinary action by my superiors.  Every public servant knows that because it is shoved down our throats in yearly training courses.  It's part of the basic ethics courses we take, just like our confidentiality courses.

She and Bill knew better, yet they have always put their loyalties out on the international auction block to the highest bidders.

You really still think there is some remote comparison there?  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2016-11-28 18:04:16 +0000 UTC]

Yet anyone can donate to a campaign. The only difference is how they accepted the money.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 18:08:53 +0000 UTC]

Not true!  Look it up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ACommissionReviewer In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2016-11-28 18:28:52 +0000 UTC]

People can donate, that's what people were doing during Trump's primary run when he was taking donations from his website directly to his campaign.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to ACommissionReviewer [2016-11-28 19:35:43 +0000 UTC]

 My days of not taking you seriously are drawing to a middle.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zeonista [2016-11-28 17:04:37 +0000 UTC]

So, who is now in favor of the Trump Department of Justice investigating the Clinton Foundation, and assisting foreign governments in the same? 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to Zeonista [2016-11-28 18:04:45 +0000 UTC]

Me, me, me, me, me!!!  

But you can bet your ass that they're working overtime destroying all possible evidence, and the AG is right there helping them by giving them pointers and by covering up all the official govt evidence too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EnforcerWolf In reply to CaciqueCaribe [2016-11-28 19:38:31 +0000 UTC]

That's true, nothing new, as this has been happening for centuries. But you know, there always seems to be some piece of evidence that never gets destroyed for some reason or another. Maybe that could be the case with Dumbary.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to EnforcerWolf [2016-11-28 20:16:05 +0000 UTC]

Oh God I hope so.  I hope there are still a few scrupulous people in the FBI and DOJ making sure the truth isn't erased.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Neetsfagging322297 [2016-06-29 16:03:28 +0000 UTC]

Maybe you can send this to the Trump Campaign or send to RealDonaldTrump´s twitter account (assuming you have one)?

neetsfagging322297.deviantart.…

Gave link to yours.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to Neetsfagging322297 [2016-06-29 16:05:45 +0000 UTC]

I don't do Twitter or Facebook, so feel free to share.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wertyla [2016-06-27 14:52:58 +0000 UTC]

I'm pretty sure this qualifies as treason... She's selling out her own country to its enemies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaciqueCaribe In reply to Wertyla [2016-06-27 19:48:07 +0000 UTC]

She has abused every position she has ever held, and she's now applying for the job of president?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HERBERT45 [2016-06-26 17:42:51 +0000 UTC]

Excellent.  Will be putting this one to good use.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DevinCamary [2016-06-26 17:24:58 +0000 UTC]

Yeah.... Hypocrisy at its finest

👍: 0 ⏩: 0