Comments: 12
CarlPearce In reply to ChainedRei [2012-06-16 21:20:38 +0000 UTC]
Cheers. This September, should be. Amazon have got it on pre-order.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MattOodles [2012-03-24 03:27:11 +0000 UTC]
It's very eye catching and has me wanting to read the book due to the awesome cover. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CarlPearce In reply to MattOodles [2012-04-17 12:12:06 +0000 UTC]
Thanks very much. Hopefully you'll like the interior work as much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xXTaiYoungXx [2012-03-23 15:19:34 +0000 UTC]
I really like this, If I saw this on my library bookshelf I would surly give it a go.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CarlPearce In reply to xXTaiYoungXx [2012-04-17 12:12:45 +0000 UTC]
Cheers. If that's the case then that's my job done already.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
citizen17 [2012-03-23 14:07:30 +0000 UTC]
I love it. It does stand out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CarlPearce In reply to citizen17 [2012-04-17 12:13:04 +0000 UTC]
Cheers, bud. I'm glad it works.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
crazyfoxmachine [2012-03-23 09:54:32 +0000 UTC]
Really neat - this should fly off the shelves!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CarlPearce In reply to crazyfoxmachine [2012-04-17 12:13:40 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, O. I hope so. No royalties off this one, but the more I sell the more employable I am.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stayte-of-the-art [2012-03-23 09:20:28 +0000 UTC]
I like it, the placement is great, it makes it feel like they are about to zoom past off the cover!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CarlPearce In reply to stayte-of-the-art [2012-04-17 12:17:01 +0000 UTC]
Cheers, bud. I don't do symmetry. It unnerves me. The way I look at it, people's faces aren't symmetrical. Neither are trees of nature in general. It's a more natural state in my eyes. But then again, maybe the symmetrical cover would stand out more? DOH!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0