Comments: 21
El-Cachadore [2009-10-16 17:51:48 +0000 UTC]
OMG THIS IS SO AWESOME!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ChildOfPuck In reply to shazisthegreatest [2009-10-16 13:17:43 +0000 UTC]
Tree-women don't have teh nips.
Yeah, I just feel like I can do the same thing, in a lot less time, a lot more cleanly if I stick with ink, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sonion [2009-10-16 04:51:45 +0000 UTC]
Nice drawing though. Did you remember to scan and do your adjustments at a high resolution? At least 300dpi...600 is better. Then after your contrast adjustments you bring the dpi back down.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChildOfPuck In reply to Sonion [2009-10-16 13:16:21 +0000 UTC]
I used 600 dpi and then adjusted the levels before reducing the size. I have no clue why the lines are so pixelated. I may re-scan and try again, because I know it shouldn't be so choppy. I'm not sure what I did wrong.
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sonion In reply to ChildOfPuck [2009-10-16 21:10:56 +0000 UTC]
Your scanning settings are probably off
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChildOfPuck In reply to Sonion [2009-10-17 12:38:35 +0000 UTC]
ah. Okay, thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sonion In reply to ChildOfPuck [2009-10-17 17:33:31 +0000 UTC]
I played around with my setting for a couple of hours before I could get them right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sonion In reply to ChildOfPuck [2009-10-17 20:30:02 +0000 UTC]
No problem...the image still looks cool though
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChildOfPuck In reply to Sonion [2009-10-17 20:38:31 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I appreciate it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChildOfPuck In reply to TheRach [2009-10-16 02:16:19 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
I like that you have a collection called "Interesting." It made me lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChildOfPuck In reply to Pyroluminescence [2009-10-16 13:25:18 +0000 UTC]
I recommend making yourself work with a brush. For me, at least, it really helped improve control in those other areas as well. It's frustrating as hell at first, but worth it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0