HOME | DD

cinnamon-lady24 — Love It When You Call

Published: 2011-08-29 12:21:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 1678; Favourites: 36; Downloads: 27
Redirect to original
Description "I found a switch,
Turned it on.
I hit the ditch--
You carried on.
I was so near,
Now you're so far.
Are you quite sure
Just who you are?

...I love it when you call,
But you never call at all.
So what's the complication? It's only conversation.
I love it when you call,
But you never call at all..."
--"Love It When You Call" by the Feeling

A present for my friend, Bego (NineTimesBetter) on tumblr, who likes my art, despite the fact that I draw, like, none of her pairings and who also makes me beautiful Kirk/Rand graphics based on the Kirk/Rand song (aka, "Miss You" by the Feeling).

So here's a drawing of her OTP, Scotty and Uhura, while he interferes with the incoming messages so send one of his own.

Montgomery "Scotty" Scott and Nyota Uhura (c) Gene Roddenberry, Paramount, etc.

Media:
-2H pencil
-Staedtler inking pens
-Pentel brush pen
-Faber-Castell and Touch colored markers
-Uni Paint white marker.
Related content
Comments: 53

FeatherQuilt1988 [2013-07-12 14:34:37 +0000 UTC]

Movie-era artwork of Scotty and Uhura, YAY!!! I love them both even better in their later years than in the TV show, so I'm very happy to see someone drawing them during that time in their lives. And you have such beautiful detail in your art, too!

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to FeatherQuilt1988 [2013-08-06 08:51:42 +0000 UTC]

This was actually a gift for a friend of mine who loves them too. Damn sweeties. <3 Thank you so much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FeatherQuilt1988 In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2013-08-06 15:18:50 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RainyCloud900 [2011-12-19 08:37:21 +0000 UTC]

MAH OTP

YEESS

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to RainyCloud900 [2012-01-12 17:56:53 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

simplecoffee [2011-09-09 07:31:28 +0000 UTC]


ADORABLE.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to simplecoffee [2011-09-09 15:34:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

simplecoffee In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-09-09 19:33:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cainstiels [2011-08-31 02:26:38 +0000 UTC]

*Totally supports Scotty/Uhura and loves this*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to Cainstiels [2011-08-31 08:46:16 +0000 UTC]

I don't really ship them, but I definitely find them adorable. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cainstiels In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-08-31 20:23:16 +0000 UTC]

np~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CapnNeewmanNorman [2011-08-30 05:32:26 +0000 UTC]

Oh hell yeah, I love this so much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to CapnNeewmanNorman [2011-08-31 08:44:08 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! That really means a lot to me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wolther [2011-08-29 22:36:00 +0000 UTC]

FFFFFFFF love

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to wolther [2011-08-31 08:43:40 +0000 UTC]

I WILL KILL YOU ALL WITH LOVE.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wolther In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-09-03 20:09:57 +0000 UTC]

HHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
*ded*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to wolther [2011-09-07 06:41:37 +0000 UTC]

YOU ARE ON CRACK.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wolther In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-09-07 10:34:02 +0000 UTC]

yes
yes i am

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

master-of-unlocking7 [2011-08-29 19:58:14 +0000 UTC]

i find this paring better than with spock lol amazing work on their outfits

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to master-of-unlocking7 [2011-08-31 08:43:29 +0000 UTC]

I prefer Spock/Uhura, but I find these two very sweet as well. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zukofangirl16 [2011-08-29 19:30:35 +0000 UTC]

So cute. I always thought these two had some chemistry(Though I don't actively ship them), so this is just....diabetes-inducing cute. ^w^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to Zukofangirl16 [2011-08-31 08:47:50 +0000 UTC]

You see, I didn't really see much chemistry between them until Final Frontier, but it seems like everyone else did. And they are adorable, though, like you, I don't really ship them actively.

By the way, it's so lovely to hear someone else refer to active and passive shipping, because I use those terms as well, but sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who does stuff like that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KaptynQerq [2011-08-29 18:30:44 +0000 UTC]

THIS PAIRING IS CANNON NO MATTER WHAT ANYBODY SAYS!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to KaptynQerq [2011-08-31 08:42:53 +0000 UTC]

Wait... people say it's not canon? That's weird. I mean, I don't really ship them (I'm more into Spock/Uhura), but I wouldn't say they aren't canon, you know?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaptynQerq In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-08-31 16:48:11 +0000 UTC]

Haha, well. They had a thing but it never really developed. So people say they aren't cannon because they're not together.
Oui, I really dislike Spock pairings. :c Spock/Uhura, really Spock/Kirk. He just never ended up with anyone.
>:I I don't count the Reboot as cannon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to KaptynQerq [2011-09-01 06:51:53 +0000 UTC]

Eh, people also say that Kirk/Rand's PROFOUND sexual tension isn't canon, but then talk about how Spock/Kirk are totally hooking up or whatever, so I don't even know anymore.

The Spock pairing I dislike really is him and Saavik, because that one was REPEATEDLY squickly and... I don't know. I just didn't get it. (Also, I really thought she was going to end up with David Marcus, so I was just generally confused.)

I do, but kind of as a different canon. Like, I think what people don't get about the reboot is that it's not actually a remake. It's really more of a sequel, you know? Because everything from TOS, etc. is supposed to have occurred and then Spock Prime goes back in time, so while it's the same characters, it's really more of a different series.
But that's just my opinion and I don't think anyone really agrees with it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaptynQerq In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-09-01 06:57:56 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I'll definatly give you that.

Dear God, I sometimes pretend that scene in the (third?) second movie didn't happen... The Search for Spock, that was the second, right?

Yes, yes, see I'm torn that way. I say Spock really went back in time but it's actually an alternate dimension. Therefore, that makes it cannon. But then I have to think about Sp/Uh being cannon and... *shivers*
I halfly agree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to KaptynQerq [2011-09-01 07:13:48 +0000 UTC]

Search for Spock is the third. Wrath of Khan is the second. I don't so much pretend it didn't happen, but I can't really imagine shipping them after that...

Yeah, but lots of things are canon that the fandom doesn't like to think about--like that fact the TOS!Chekov attempts to rape a Klingon woman in a moment of madness and that according to one episode of TOS, women aren't allowed to be captains. (I'm not trying to sound bitchy, by the way, I just get annoyed about how much fandom denies this stuff sometimes.)
Personally, I kind of like Spock/Uhura because of the way that their characters were built up in XI, but I know that not everyone does, so...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaptynQerq In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-09-01 07:20:24 +0000 UTC]

Right, right, right, I knew that.
I agree, I don't think they would have a relationship. After that Spock is hardly Spock for a while after and probably wouldn't think of her as a mate or "girlfriend." Whatever Vulcans would call them.

Did they actually say woman couldn't be captains in TOS? Like out-loud? Honestly, you must remember the time it was written in. Gene wanted a female officer and that was pushing it. I believe that was the main reason for VOY. They were SO nervous, even in 2001--was it?--that Janeway would be shot down. They did so much to make her excepted and the like. (I watched a biography somewhere...)
Ehh, to each his own. I don't like it since they wrote they made an episode (one of the first few in S1 TOS) where they made Uhura go all, "I bet moons are pretty on VUlcan, and so are you." Spock was like, "An objects beauty is seen in the eyes of the beholder (or something... I'm paraphrasing)and I have no preference." She was all, *sulks back to station...*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to KaptynQerq [2011-09-01 16:50:02 +0000 UTC]

Exactly. (lol about the mate/girlfriend.)

No, no, no, I totally understand about the time and stuff like that. I don't actually have a problem with it since it was ret-conned out. But I'm referring to the strangeness of the episode "Turnabout Intruder". I think that's where that's said. If not, then whatever. But I completely understand about the difference of the time period and such. Trust me.
I need to rewatch the first few episodes, because I've not re-watched them at all, so I can't quite remember how annoying it is or not. I was kind of into Rand at the time so...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaptynQerq In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-09-01 17:57:57 +0000 UTC]

Haha.

"Turnabout Intruder?" They do actually say it? I'll watch it today, I have to see that, if it is there.
Yeah, I've only seen a handful, but I started at the beginning. That's how I saw that one.
Rand? Haha, she was okay. For the obvious oddest reason, I hated Chapel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to KaptynQerq [2011-09-07 06:46:46 +0000 UTC]

I think it's in that one.

I've seen all the episodes, it's just that I haven't gotten to rewatch all of them, so some aren't as fresh in my memory.
I like Chapel! I thought she was interesting because they made her have a crush on Spock, but she was still competant. Same with Rand, really. (And Uhura) It was nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaptynQerq In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-09-07 23:45:00 +0000 UTC]

I'll have to check, still. *is slow at doing stuff*

Hmmn, I didn't look at it that away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to KaptynQerq [2011-09-09 12:21:31 +0000 UTC]

I know that feeling.

Really? Oh... well, I hope I contributed something!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KaptynQerq In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-09-10 05:54:42 +0000 UTC]

You did! Haha!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zelda-Chan202 [2011-08-29 15:36:53 +0000 UTC]

THIS IS ADORABLE.

I AM DYING FROM IT'S SWEETNESS.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to Zelda-Chan202 [2011-08-31 08:41:54 +0000 UTC]

I WILL KILL YOU WITH THE ADORABLENESS OF IT ALL.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

keljoy [2011-08-29 13:44:39 +0000 UTC]

AAAAAAAAAAH OTP forever. :'3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to keljoy [2011-08-29 14:16:35 +0000 UTC]

They are just adorable. I mean, I don't really ship them, but I do find them very cute.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JudiHyuga [2011-08-29 13:35:44 +0000 UTC]

AWWWW ,<3 a beautiful canon pairing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to JudiHyuga [2011-08-29 14:16:12 +0000 UTC]

I don't really ship them (though they don't especially bother me), but I admit that they're awfully sweet. <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JudiHyuga In reply to cinnamon-lady24 [2011-08-30 03:19:56 +0000 UTC]

I agree <3333

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

noquierosignin [2011-08-29 12:55:33 +0000 UTC]

THE LIGHT AROUND THE WIRES. THE LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to noquierosignin [2011-08-29 14:15:39 +0000 UTC]

I love doing gradients with these markers so much I can't even. It is so much fun.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

noquierosignin [2011-08-29 12:52:39 +0000 UTC]

THE LITTLE HEART IN THE SCREEN AND HER FACE, HER PERFECT FACE, THE FACE SHE MAKES ONLY FOR SCOTTY, THAT'S THE ONE YES.
AND HIS FACE, MY GOODNESS HIS FACE IS PRECIOUS, BECAUSE NOT EVEN THE ENTERPRISE MAKES HIM DO THAT FACE. Seriously tho I love how his face is drawn, so much love and caring and sweetness trapped between some black lines Y U DO ART SO GOODLY I CANNOT EVEN.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to noquierosignin [2011-08-29 14:15:11 +0000 UTC]

I AM SO GLAD YOU SAW THE LITTLE HEART. <3 I loved drawing her expression here. It was really fun to draw.

ASJKJAFJHDFJHADSJHJHSKHDJFHKSDJHKSDJ NOW YOU ARE EMOTIONALLY COMPROMISING ME. WHAT?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

noquierosignin [2011-08-29 12:38:17 +0000 UTC]

MY GOODNESS WOMAN WHAT.

WHAT.

I LOVE YOU DAMMIT.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to noquierosignin [2011-08-29 14:13:38 +0000 UTC]

I LOVE YOU TOO BRO. THAT'S WHY I DREW IT.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

noquierosignin [2011-08-29 12:37:41 +0000 UTC]

A BUCKET FOR THEM.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cinnamon-lady24 In reply to noquierosignin [2011-08-29 14:13:22 +0000 UTC]




THERE YOU GO.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>