HOME | DD

CityLightning β€” In Arcadia
Published: 2011-08-27 23:06:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 2054; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 9
Redirect to original
Description "What are you reading?"

I looked up at the girl, head and hip cocked like a gun, blocking the sunlight. How very charming of her.

"Stephen Fry."

"Oh! I'm very impressed."

"I highly doubt that."

"I mean it, believe me." An unusually blazing demand, made with commitment. My eyes went back to the pages again.

"I don't really believe anyone nowadays." I said, with a hint of a smile and a shrug, attempting disenchanted composure. She seemed to fold herself neatly beside me onto the cool bench, leaning slightly, lightly to her right {towards me}. I gave way a fraction.

There was a pause, during which I read -

    ...I gather that the picture does not make light of his suffering, mock him, underplay his achievements or present him as anything other than the impassioned Son of God that Christians believe him to be. It does that which art does best: it shows a human being to us, just as Shakespeare showed us Antony and Cleopatra, with more regard for human truth than for historical.


- and a whistling young gardener came around the corner of a white-flowered myrtle bush to catch sight of us. I felt, rather than saw her smile at him, saw his slow grin widen his face in response; a tip of his cap and he was gone again. His whistle dallied behind him for a moment, then was swallowed up by the incessant murmur of insects in the gardens. The sun was palely warm, the air fizzy to draw down my throat.

She leant over again: she wanted to see what the book said. I relented after a moment, watched her curved red lips make sense of the words, like a child, and her eyebrows dip in concentration. Because she was delightful, in her own way.

"Ah, I see. It is about religion."

"Only this part. And it's not, really. It's about a film."

"What film?" Her tone was playful, warm, and somehow slender.

"The Last Temptation of Christ."

"Spare me, oh, please. I can't stand religion. Never could. I think it's a cardinal fault of mine. Whenever I see those devoted, zealous acolytes or watery-eyed, fat, Jesus-loving middle-aged-women I feel certain I'm missing something. Something important, too - you see, they don't care about anything anymore. Oh, you might claim they do, that they might care more; but in reality, they're already focused on death. That's all the afterlife is. It's morbid, but it's fascinating, and they're in the afterlife already, in their minds. But I'm too vain. I like to feel the sun on my face."

I couldn't help laughing. "Yes, I suppose you are vain."

She let out a sigh, drawn-out but still feminine. I'm sure she was pleased with it. Quietly, she lowered her head onto my shoulder, and the light caused some strands of her hair to glow gold against my skin. We sat in this way, listening to the hum of the fountains for a while.

"Religion is the opium of the masses." she whispered presently.

Again I laughed at her; the sharp burst of it caused a bird to take fright from where it had alighted nearby. She sat up once more, regarding the spot where it had been angrily.

"I'm sorry, I just can't believe you said that. That has to be one of the most overused quotations of all time. It's not relevant, it's so funny-"

"Well, apparently you don't believe people anymore, so I'm hardly surprised," she interrupted, but amiably.

"Yes, I did say that, didn't I." We were both too young to stay irritated for long. "I'm sorry about the bird."

"It was a thrush, did you see?"

The jasmine tree we were sitting under gave a creamy, star-like fragrance out that made us drowsy, especially her. She stretched out, laboriously, as I turned to look at her properly.

Her hair was still glowing in the waning light, light fox-red, and she smiled as if she were granting permission for you to run your fingers through it. The clothes she wore were not flawless, nor new, but well-cut and pleasing. A red scarf was tied like a sash at her slim waist, jauntily, in faux-vagabond style - the overall impression was that of a certain studied carelessness, one that you sensed she worked hard at to cultivate. The aim was abandon, youthful abandon: she did achieve it. But it was a little too perfect, perhaps calculated, to be real. The very effortless look of it drew attention to where effort had been made. Perhaps most people would not notice.

"Sprezzatura." I remarked to her.

"Hm?"

"The act, or art, of mastery over facility, carelessness. Mostly referring to art or literature, something like that. And common in real life, too. Italian courtiers. You're beautiful."

"Thank you." she said.

Her movements were at odds with the appearance she wanted; she surged forward, her energy palpable, obvious in the abrupt fidgeting in her hands and half-hidden in her unconscious rearranging of slim legs. She encased it to slow herself down. It made for a curious sight to see, and it always fascinated me. Vibrancy allowed to shine in such gracious inches.

"You mistake me, though. I am all earnestness."

"I do not, because I can see that. I know you."

She closed her eyes as if dealt a killing blow, and leant on me once again. There was another silence. I finished the article on Christ. She asked a question, with her eyes still closed.

"You don't think I'm in love with anyone, do you?"

"No. Are you?"

"No, I don't think so. Are you?"

"No. I'm not in love."

We stayed like that until it had turned dark, and the paper lanterns were brought out, and I had finished the book.
Related content
Comments: 43

photographer7777 [2012-01-09 23:52:59 +0000 UTC]

You're writing is amazing!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to photographer7777 [2012-01-14 13:41:33 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

photographer7777 In reply to CityLightning [2012-01-14 15:23:50 +0000 UTC]

Welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mynameisfaerie [2012-01-04 16:48:49 +0000 UTC]

Your metaphors and similes are very clever.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to mynameisfaerie [2012-01-05 22:32:30 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

veritaslux [2011-12-21 17:06:28 +0000 UTC]

Ahhhh, this is so perfect! I thought it only fair to look over your work and I am bowled away! You know I'm a sucker for romance, but this is just sublime! The ending made me have chills, it's wonderful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to veritaslux [2011-12-21 21:21:52 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much! For the watch, as well. <3 Made my day. I love it if my words have an effect on someone, ugh, that's so good to know. Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

91816119 [2011-09-24 18:32:06 +0000 UTC]



Devious Rating


Vision:

Originality:

Technique:

Impact:


I thought, to make life easier for you, that I would split your piece into sections, make points with bullets, and colour-coding (green for good things, red for things that need a little improvement - not necessarily "bad" things). Because who doesn't like colour-coding?!

i. Dialogue
Your use of short sentences coupled with the almost fractured passages between the two characters (e.g. the "sprezzatura" conversation - the narrator starts this dialogue from a continued strain of thought; one which the other character cannot see; a spontaneous 'outburst'), creates a feeling of intrigue as to the 'before' and 'after' chapters of the two characters' story. It also gives the reader a very unique view of each persons' personality and behaviour.
To maintain the simplicity, you have in places missed out who it was who said certain things. I, for one, read through the piece several times; not just so that I was familiar enough with it to critique it properly, but also to really get a hold on who was saying what. (I must say, though, it was a pleasure to read it as many times as I did!)

ii. Language
An excellent display of vocabulary - well put together. It most certainly did not feel like I'd just had a thesaurus thrown at me, which is always a nice feeling. You most certainly knew your words.
Your description managed to hold so many possibilities in it: I think that you used it well in order to create that sense of mystery, and to maintain the shadow over the true purpose of the piece - I could most definitely see the characters in a garden from centuries gone by...or just yesterday.

iii. Structure
Very easy to read, pleasantly fell on the eyes. Even when you used brackets that I myself am not a fan of (e.g. "...lightly to her right {towards me}."), I felt that they suited your piece and style of writing so perfectly, that I couldn't possibly pick on you for them!

iv. Plot & Ideas
By managing to write a capturing and intense (although at the same time light and 'friendly') piece about, as you say, "nothing", you have succeeded in being fantastically original - while nothing much happens, I would categorise this under both 'fiction', and 'demonstration' - because this is a perfect example of how to write a piece that feeds off dialogue.

v. Overview
Overall, I think this was a brilliant piece. An absolute pleasure to read - and strangely uplifting; I felt lighter after reading it. It is a very happy, summery snippet of prose; one that leaves you with a warm feeling after reading it. The techniques you've used - even if some of them are sub-conscious and totally unintended - have made this piece more than just a dialogue between two people. You were right: the pauses added a great deal to the piece, more depth. But the actual way in which you filled those pauses makes this piece as wonderful as it is.

vi. For the Future
I have little in terms of technique to offer you (please not that I have not yet been through your gallery - although I most certainly intend to): but I wouldlike to see you try different genres. Dabble about a bit, and find things that fit. After all, writing isn't about tying yourself down to one thing; it's about releasing yourself, letting your words flow, and seeing where they take you: and I assure you, if you do this, the results will be greatly pleasing to both yourself, and those you share them with.


The Artist thought this was FAIR


Apologies for any typos! <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to 91816119 [2011-09-25 17:45:08 +0000 UTC]

I definitely like colour-coding. <3

I agree with you on the dialogue - I tend to be vague, leaving it up to the audience to actually figure things out and work, which is not always a good thing at all. I'm pleased beyond description that the language felt real; as a general rule I trust in myself in that field; I hate it when you feel as if a person's used a thesaurus too much, god yes. It always seems too much. It should be in proportion, so I'm glad you felt it was!

And I'm glad the structure was easy to read. I use those absurdly stupid brackets because of the way they remind me of twisty iron gates to a garden. It's a sentimental thing to do, but it makes me think more old-worldly, and I like when that balances out in surprising ways. Thank you for finding it original, even though it may be that nothing "happens" in the piece.

It's so great that you included how it made you feel, because that's the most important bit. And that you bothered to read the Artist's Comments, referencing the pauses. Your critique is thoughtful and mature, and I wish I had more comments like this - things to build on, to remember. Please do check out my gallery, I'm indebted anyway, haha. I do intend to try out other genres, so your advice is very well aimed. Thank you very much. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

91816119 In reply to CityLightning [2011-09-25 19:20:19 +0000 UTC]

My pleasure! Keep writing, and I will definitely be checking out the rest of your gallery.

Funny...that's exactly what those brackets made me think of when I was reading it...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MoonlightWillow6 [2011-09-22 02:23:02 +0000 UTC]

This was incredible. I loved how ambiguous the whole thing was. I don't know what to say. This piece is just amazing. Excellent job and congrats on the (well deserved) DLD!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to MoonlightWillow6 [2011-09-22 20:33:14 +0000 UTC]

Ahh, thank you. That's really sweet of you, and it was a lovely comment. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MoonlightWillow6 In reply to CityLightning [2011-09-23 00:01:36 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DailyLitDeviations [2011-09-21 06:45:43 +0000 UTC]

Your wonderful literary work has been chosen to be featured by DLD (Daily Literature Deviations) in a news article that can be found here [link]
Be sure to check out the other artists featured and show your support by ing the News Article.

Keep writing and keep creating.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to DailyLitDeviations [2011-09-22 20:32:37 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much, I'm really grateful. You guys are great. <3 xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DailyLitDeviations In reply to CityLightning [2011-09-23 03:28:03 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LyCrow [2011-09-09 14:37:03 +0000 UTC]

Would it be to clichΓ© to say 'I'm very impressed'?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to LyCrow [2011-09-09 21:26:41 +0000 UTC]

Not at all. I'm so very happy you think so. Can I ask what impressed you, or is that being pedantic? Don't worry, just thank you. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

glitterydoom [2011-09-05 15:41:14 +0000 UTC]

the whole thing makes me want to sigh, in the best way possible. It's just so beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to glitterydoom [2011-09-09 21:26:00 +0000 UTC]

Gah, thank you very much, I'm delighted. So sincerely. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

glitterydoom In reply to CityLightning [2011-09-09 21:52:23 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome (: xx

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Vigilo [2011-09-03 09:48:49 +0000 UTC]

Right, first: Fryyy! Yay!

Secondly: your descriptions! They are gorgeous. Your ending sentence is fantastic, and the bit about the gardener is possibly my favourite part of this story. This whole bit is pretty stunning:

"There was a pause, during which I read -

...I gather [...] historical.

- and a whistling young gardener came around the corner of a white-flowered myrtle bush to catch sight of us. I felt, rather than saw her smile at him, saw his slow grin widen his face in response; a tip of his cap and he was gone again. His whistle dallied behind him for a moment, then was swallowed up by the incessant murmur of insects in the gardens. The sun was palely warm, the air fizzy to draw down my throat."

Also, I adore some of your dialogue - "'I'm sorry about the bird.' 'It was a thrush, did you see?'" is so natural, it's brilliant. I've a hard time believing some of it - the part about religion by the young woman seemed a bit - obvious? It wasn't as refreshing and new as the rest of the story, but that could totally just be me. I really like the ending of it - "But I'm too vain. I like to feel the sun on my face." - but before it, it seems a bit.. off.

I really, really love a lot of your dialogue and your style of writing - it reminds me a lot of Agatha Christie's dialogue, for some reason, which is wonderfully admirable, as Agatha Christie's dialogue is half of what I love about her. Sentences like this: "You mistake me, though. I am all earnestness." have this wonderful character to them, it's gorgeous (which may be why the religion-paragraph pales in contrast?).

One v. small quibble: "The aim was abandon, youthful abandon; she did achieve it." I would suggest making the semicolon a colon: "The aim was abandon, youthful abandon: she did achieve it." to make it a bit more clear. (:

"She closed her eyes as if dealt a killing blow, and leant on me once again." I honestly can't tell if this is meant in lighthearted fun or seriousness, and I love it. Your ambiguousness and subtleties are gorgeous!

Very nicely done.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to Vigilo [2011-09-09 21:25:29 +0000 UTC]

I KNOW. FRY, RIGHT? FRY. I'm watching QI right now. I think I'm crazy. I want him to read me a bedtime story or something.

Thank you so much for the in-depth comment, it's so great of you. I'm pleased you like the descriptions, very much. Re the dialogue; I wanted to make it natural, so it's great that you picked up on that, but I do agree, that paragraph is unnatural. My only excuse is that, well, I know it's not natural. A lot of old authors write long speeches like that for their characters, I think purely to get the ideas across, not for the sake of accuracy. It's a shame it was a bit obvious, but thanks for telling me! I think she's not the most intelligent person, not predisposed to form original conclusions.

I have never read Agatha Christie, but I'm going to take it as a compliment. <333 I will take your advice on the colon. Thank you. For the whole comment too. I like ambiguity. I like it when the reader has to discuss things with themselves, and when small things mean bigger ones. And I like you. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Vigilo In reply to CityLightning [2011-09-10 12:08:43 +0000 UTC]

RIGHTY-O. FRYYYYYYY. You've got me watching QI on Youtube and I'm so confused right now (I just randomly jumped into random episodes) but laughing so hard because it's so funny.

I'm glad you liked the comment; I really liked your story. And please, if you ever get the chance, just take a look at Agatha Christie's stuff. Murder mysteries, yes, and it's not much of the detective thing as it is with how she writes and makes her characters sound and everything ... (I think you might like the The Mysterious Mr. Quin book by her, and of course, And Then There Were None is just a must-read.)

Aw. I like you too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

breathingglassstars [2011-09-03 03:59:43 +0000 UTC]

oh, god, your dialogue is so real i can't see a single breach of flow. i can easily see this conversation happening between these people as if it were real and i was there. there's so little length to the story, but i already feel like i know the characters.
you're just too wonderful and this is incredibly lovely

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to breathingglassstars [2011-09-09 20:47:43 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, darling. Ahh, that's so great of you to say and I'm really glad you liked it. Love you. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

breathingglassstars In reply to CityLightning [2011-09-15 21:42:53 +0000 UTC]

you're so welcome, love
i love you too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ophillia [2011-08-31 21:32:26 +0000 UTC]

Very nice work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to Ophillia [2011-09-01 21:36:01 +0000 UTC]

Haha, thank you very much. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ophillia In reply to CityLightning [2011-09-15 21:08:53 +0000 UTC]

Very welcome^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thelastperformer [2011-08-29 03:03:56 +0000 UTC]

Actually, I love things where nothing happens at all.
The descriptions are absolutely beautiful here and I love the ambiguity.
Except I don't know who Stephen Fry is But I did really rather enjoy this piece!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to thelastperformer [2011-08-29 22:45:23 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, this was a lovely comment! Stephen Fry is an all-round intellectual/comedian/actor/writer person. Very weirdly British, but unusually not an idiot. xD Do look him up sometime. Thank you again. <3 xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

thelastperformer In reply to CityLightning [2011-08-29 23:02:04 +0000 UTC]

Well, of course! It was a great work
I think I'll take you up on that and look him up sometime

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

neuroticmnemonic [2011-08-28 19:36:57 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to neuroticmnemonic [2011-08-29 22:42:37 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you think so. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

neuroticmnemonic In reply to CityLightning [2011-08-30 20:18:05 +0000 UTC]

Oh, indeed! Your choice of wording is wonderful, and the dialogue flowed really well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

toxic-nebulae [2011-08-28 14:19:28 +0000 UTC]

oh my, this is wonderful.

I especially love the last line: it sums it up beautifully.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to toxic-nebulae [2011-08-29 22:43:03 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much; I'm glad it did, I really felt it did as well. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cloud-of-stars [2011-08-28 12:55:03 +0000 UTC]

"too young to stay irritated for long" ... i feel 9000 years old

this is lovely, beautiful, stunning... i sort of imagine it being slightly italian? i don't know, maybe its the gardens...

i need a personal detective to explain all the hidden things.... and he shall wear a trilby ^_^

anyway sorry fo rmy random comments but i love this, it's really lovely. What a funny pair those two are!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to Cloud-of-stars [2011-08-29 22:43:51 +0000 UTC]

That's your problem, ain't it?

Thank you! Maybe slightly Italian, yeah. xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jadite [2011-08-28 04:37:03 +0000 UTC]

beautiful piece <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CityLightning In reply to Jadite [2011-08-28 12:07:58 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much. First comment. <3 xox

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jadite In reply to CityLightning [2011-08-29 00:13:48 +0000 UTC]

but of course <3 (:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0