Comments: 25
kragf [2021-12-03 16:23:44 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mechangel2002 [2011-01-04 06:27:55 +0000 UTC]
I couldn't help but notice you bill your art as "total PG fanfare" -- when the material in many of the pieces can be considered 14+ or 18A.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
co4 In reply to mechangel2002 [2011-01-04 06:48:10 +0000 UTC]
dA doesn't seem to have an issue with it, and neither does IndyPlanet, who admonishes publishers to keep their sample images tame enough for general viewers.
Honestly, I don't get why you say "nudity" could be an issue here. She's wearing a teddy after all, and not even a real cut out one. I've seen more skin on the beach and quite frankly, so have you. If you wish to say it's "too provocative" though, I'd accept that...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mechangel2002 In reply to co4 [2011-01-04 09:17:12 +0000 UTC]
Oh I forgot that was the same page, and yes the group does not accept nudity which we state IN the guidelines -- we're working to maintain a general audience. We have several members who work in the adult comics stream (including myself), and they've willingly submitted alternate versions of their comics that are more appropriate. I recommend the same for certain pieces you'd like to submit as well.
Whoops yeah you're right there but your stuff still isn't PG.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
co4 In reply to mechangel2002 [2011-01-04 17:36:19 +0000 UTC]
Okay, I throw up my hands. I've seen more vulgarity in Captain Underpants books. What modifications would you suggest then, that would earn this page a "PG" rating?
As it is, I'm beginning to find this whole exchange rather bizarre, but entertaining to say the least. Here's an avat of a woman's bosom, not too dissimilar from April's here, admonishing me about the nudity of the piece, of which there is none. And what was unacceptable about "April Does TV 31", my last submission? (What rating would you give it?) I also find it odd that you had to come back and comment on this page rather than my submission, "April Does TV 31". Just what is on thy mind, O mechangel?
And you still didn't answer my question about deleting my files.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DelicatelikeUme [2010-10-14 15:21:53 +0000 UTC]
Oh, it is extremely beautiful, beautiful, modelling is professional, reverence!
Most propbably on human body structure are studied, in the study.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
co4 In reply to DelicatelikeUme [2010-10-23 14:17:37 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, sir! I think...lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
michiganj24 [2010-07-26 08:54:59 +0000 UTC]
BOING I think I know what opened that door lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Levia-the-Dragon [2010-06-07 14:06:45 +0000 UTC]
Oh deart... of course she's goign ot go and investigate...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
knytcrawlr [2010-03-17 06:55:00 +0000 UTC]
another great page
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
co4 In reply to knytcrawlr [2010-03-17 14:38:15 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for reading, sir!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Amaniwolf [2010-03-16 18:50:42 +0000 UTC]
Wow....very cool, the myster continues, as doe the sexieness!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Amaniwolf In reply to co4 [2010-03-17 15:46:52 +0000 UTC]
Awwwwooooo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Laurensdeblocq [2010-03-16 16:14:37 +0000 UTC]
again, very nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
co4 In reply to Laurensdeblocq [2010-03-17 14:36:12 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, Laurensdeblocq. How's the sculpting going?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boyann [2010-03-16 16:12:16 +0000 UTC]
I am in awe.
You're so good, the page looks 'alive' and incredible with its overall impact.
Your heroine's facial expressions ['acting'..?] - especially her eyes - are so convincing making her credible and not 'just a cartoon character'.
She IS The Character!
And I love the costume!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
co4 In reply to Boyann [2010-03-17 14:34:39 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, sir! Yes, my intent is to give her more depth and therefore make her more "real".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boyann In reply to co4 [2010-03-17 14:41:09 +0000 UTC]
You've suceeded, by all means. Respect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0