HOME | DD

couleur — Starry Night

Published: 2008-05-28 14:54:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 4095; Favourites: 76; Downloads: 71
Redirect to original
Description Copyright © 2008 Lim Wan Xiong, All Rights Reserved
__________________

Rantau Abang, Terengganu, Malaysia

Canon 20D + Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM + Manfrotto 055PROB + Manfrotto 808RC4 + 5M Cable Release

This photo upsets me when it comes to quality. My camera seems to have some problems, there are so-called "dead pixels", quoted by Canon today. They said they had never seen or came across anything like this serious. It's strange, sharp little white and RGB saturated running all over.

I didn't realize about it until yesterday. The problem is that, the multimedia storage previewer (Epson P2000) that I bought couldn't zoom in when it's a RAW file. And I thought it was all good. I don't think it was dead pixels, because it was very unstable and it goes all over. It's pretty eccentric and a rare case. I was the first ever person who issued this report to the local Canon service center.

It totaled my photo and I had no idea how to fix it since it was so visible and sharp. There are probably a more then a few thousand, like noise. But it isn't.

Anyways, I wanted to submit another landscape format, but it is very difficult for me to accept this case. My damn camera failed me for the first ever time.

--

This photo took me about more then an hour to compose. I had shot a variation of more then 6 different exposures and compositions. It took a long while, but worth the effort to wait.

We checked in pretty late, and it was almost twelve in the night. If I could remember, it was around eleven something. We were all pretty exhausted after a whole day of driving. But my friend, Izzat, wanted to check out the turtles which Rantau Abang is well known for it's nesting place. We stayed at a chalet facing the sea which between it was a river. Pretty interesting to see the segregation of different elements.

Not to mention it was pitch black outside. But it was fortunate that four of us only brought one torch light and the other used their built in stable flash cellphones. I didn't had any external light source with me.

It was very dark, very very dark. If you look behind, you couldn't even see anyything. Which really freaks me out. We walked to the beach, just a few distance from our guest house. When we reached the beach, it was so beautiful, I find it very difficult to explain this. First of all, you can see lights on the horizon, dedicated by the fishermen's boats. Then there is the moon. It was bloody gorgeous, and red. I mean really red. It was sitting at the edge of the horizon too. Just about and inch higher from my eyesight. I never seen anything quite like it. The scenery was unexplainable. The ambient light around was from the moon itself, while everything was pitch black.

I didn't get to photograph that moment because my friends we're so keen on looking for the turtles. We wandered off quite a distance away, about more then 2-3 kilometers. Very far off from where we stayed. And it was so dark that if they left me there, I would be paranoid and start thinking about spirits or "pontianaks". After they we're satisfied and gave up looking for turtles, we went back. And I told them I wanted to get a picture. By the time we had arrive to that specific location it was very late but the moon had risen and changed it characteristics in terms of light and colour. It was quite bright, like a huge production light blasting on the scene, just like in the movies. The mood was pretty surreal.

It took me a while to get the exposure calculated. While the shutter was flipped open, we talked all night until it was around two or nearly three midnight.



Shutter Speed: 1213/1 second

Date Picture Taken: May 24, 2008, 11:59:18 PM

Full-size Recommended
Related content
Comments: 68

couleur In reply to ??? [2008-09-23 06:19:37 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Galeee In reply to couleur [2008-09-23 14:18:02 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrianWolfe [2008-06-25 12:51:41 +0000 UTC]

To me it looks like a result of shooting a long exposure with no noise reduction turned on in-camera. 1213/1 second is quite an exposure, when I shoot exposures like I get the same thing, unless I turn on noise reduction. I know there are ways to create a noise reduction profile in PS that is supposed to work just as well as in-camera noise reduction, but I havent tried it myself. Been meaning to considering it would really save on eating up batteries.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to BrianWolfe [2008-09-08 17:41:44 +0000 UTC]

Its not the noise. Its the sensor. Lets say, its about time the camera has to be put to sleep.

I wouldnt like to turn on the noise reduction, because it will take another 1213 sec just to wait.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alysonhart [2008-06-23 13:36:44 +0000 UTC]

The contrast it's great, i like so much! +fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to alysonhart [2008-09-08 20:04:16 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alysonhart In reply to couleur [2008-09-11 13:02:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shiftis [2008-06-07 00:13:36 +0000 UTC]

Very nice photo.

How did you calculate the exposure?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to shiftis [2008-09-08 20:16:48 +0000 UTC]

I boost up the iso to 1600 and 3200. Then I calculate how many stops of aperture i'm going to use then compensate it with the shutter speed.

It isnt that complicated, and most of the time I just assume it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rykardo [2008-06-05 19:09:28 +0000 UTC]

This photo have been featured here: Wonderful Landscapes | Waterscapes - May [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to Rykardo [2008-09-08 20:17:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rykardo [2008-06-01 09:41:39 +0000 UTC]

This photo have been featured here: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to Rykardo [2008-09-27 16:55:32 +0000 UTC]

Why how nice of you. Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jyi1693 [2008-05-31 17:22:13 +0000 UTC]

Niiiiiceeeee shot! Deserves a fave.

Hmm... I think those really are dead pixels. Like those that pop up irritatingly on monitors which show a colour and never change. It could also be because of such a long exposure it went through. Maybe an EOS 20Da would perform better?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to jyi1693 [2008-09-27 16:57:32 +0000 UTC]

Yes. It is, Canon asked for RM1000 to fix, crazy right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jyi1693 In reply to couleur [2008-10-06 06:30:34 +0000 UTC]

Whoa, RM1000.. That really is crazy. Maybe because the CMOS needs to be replaced.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Quatroversion [2008-05-30 16:50:43 +0000 UTC]

I guess it's the ISO, and I feel very sad that your camera failed for you, but anyway, it's a nice picture

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to Quatroversion [2008-09-27 16:59:24 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I was very disappointed about my camera.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pagaman [2008-05-29 20:05:14 +0000 UTC]

Hmm.
I've found this

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to pagaman [2008-09-27 17:03:47 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it is called a Hot Pixel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dlt2 [2008-05-29 05:48:26 +0000 UTC]

great shot worth all the composing

terrible quality >_< thats real bad

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to dlt2 [2008-05-29 14:03:05 +0000 UTC]

I know. I'm so disappointed about this issue.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dlt2 In reply to couleur [2008-05-30 17:51:34 +0000 UTC]

i understand. relax. it's not like some permanent life-changing growth or sort

wtf

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to dlt2 [2008-05-31 00:30:02 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. I'm changing to a new camera. But not now in the moment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

julienpier [2008-05-29 03:51:55 +0000 UTC]

I really don't bother about the death pixels, it takes nothing off from the gorgeousness of this picture!

But maybe was this a magnetic field close from where you were! Mine did this too... in a church! Maybe spirits, who know?

I feel like laying down and watching the moon, it is so... surreal, so awesome! And the stars, it's like if they were falling from the sky! I adore it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to julienpier [2008-05-29 14:03:04 +0000 UTC]

I bet your view is far better then this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

julienpier In reply to couleur [2008-05-30 01:49:32 +0000 UTC]

I depends on where

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

baumaxx1 [2008-05-29 00:04:37 +0000 UTC]

Same about the camera, but I like the way the picture blends day and night.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to baumaxx1 [2008-05-29 14:03:02 +0000 UTC]

day and night? I think you got it all wrong. This is night... all night.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

baumaxx1 In reply to couleur [2008-05-30 13:20:08 +0000 UTC]

Yeahm I know... but it looks like both... part of it looks like day time is what I meant, but it's just the lighting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to baumaxx1 [2008-09-07 19:51:48 +0000 UTC]

It was actually pitch black.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

UberGabzz [2008-05-28 21:36:08 +0000 UTC]

Actually, you might want to try getting a more adapted ISO. I just think it's a heavy case of GRAIN...

wait a sec... That doesn't work... aren't you using digital?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to UberGabzz [2008-05-29 14:02:55 +0000 UTC]

It's ISO 100. By far this is the most stable ISO to use. And this is no grain or noise. It's something to do with the sensor.

Yes, I am using digital as always.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

radol [2008-05-28 19:38:08 +0000 UTC]

well exposure was very long, so it might be noise from overheating camera sensor. thats why digital astrophotographers use special sensor cooling. anyway, try free tool from polaroid to clean up - [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to radol [2008-05-29 14:13:44 +0000 UTC]

I can agree with what you said about the over heating. I'm not sure. But this is definitely not grain. The ISO on DSLRs are more stable compared to compacts, unless you boost it up to 3200. But by then it would still be better and much less visible then this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

radol In reply to couleur [2008-05-30 16:30:13 +0000 UTC]

it's definitely too much noise for 20 minute exposure, so sensor might broken anyway. the most important question is, how "standard" exposure time photos look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to radol [2008-09-07 19:51:27 +0000 UTC]

The sensor is fucked up. Canon quoted me a super ridiculous price. But I sold the camera and bought a new 40D. And now, after a month, 50D is out. Super suck... oh well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

radol In reply to couleur [2008-09-11 23:25:56 +0000 UTC]

yeah - 50D. "medium" size is like max resolution in my camera

by the way, wasn't 5d a better idea?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to radol [2008-09-12 06:51:13 +0000 UTC]

Erm, the technology of 5D was pretty old and out dated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

radol In reply to couleur [2008-09-12 07:38:06 +0000 UTC]

but it's fullframe

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VictorAZZuRo [2008-05-28 19:35:00 +0000 UTC]

ah, and they are not dead pixels. a dead pixel is not RGB . it is another kind of problem from the sensor . and the funny thing is that they appeared only at iso 200 and higher and alwaysin the same spot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to VictorAZZuRo [2008-05-29 14:13:43 +0000 UTC]

You mean, your camera produces this too? I dont think it's anything related to the ISO, but more towards the sensor. I'm using 100, how bad can it be even if it was 10,000 seconds.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VictorAZZuRo In reply to couleur [2008-05-29 15:33:34 +0000 UTC]

i know, i don;t think it is related to the long exposure ....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to VictorAZZuRo [2008-09-07 19:54:13 +0000 UTC]

The sensor is fucked up. Thats the reason.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VictorAZZuRo [2008-05-28 19:31:42 +0000 UTC]

i had the same problem with a nikon D200, brand new. but i had only 7. they replaced my camera.. anyway, nice photo good composition and i really love long-exp shots . All the health and luck in the world !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to VictorAZZuRo [2008-05-29 14:13:42 +0000 UTC]

Is it like an X mark when you zoom in 100%? I had some white X's and blues and red like LED, and whites which are sharp edged pixels, all over.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VictorAZZuRo In reply to couleur [2008-05-29 15:32:57 +0000 UTC]

yep, they were exactly like an X or like a + it was very strange. and i am sure it was not a dead pixel . also tried to over heat the sensor, because i understood that the camera has a protection and it will reset, but i had no luck with that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to VictorAZZuRo [2008-09-07 19:54:42 +0000 UTC]

X. Interesting isn't it?

It means, the camera is dying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

draftwave [2008-05-28 19:29:29 +0000 UTC]

no words...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

couleur In reply to draftwave [2008-05-29 14:13:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>