HOME | DD

CradeElcin — We see each other later.

Published: 2011-11-27 18:12:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 2615; Favourites: 37; Downloads: 333
Redirect to original
Description MLP is owned by Hasbro.
Related content
Comments: 48

NB1K [2012-11-14 23:45:05 +0000 UTC]

*Sigh* If only scootaloo was at RD's age, she be the perfect match for her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EbonyManta [2012-09-30 21:10:16 +0000 UTC]

Man, I totally didn't see this picture as odd at all until I looked at the comments... derp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to EbonyManta [2012-10-01 02:27:27 +0000 UTC]

herp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wandering-Dreams [2012-07-12 07:35:00 +0000 UTC]

Scoot didn't see that one coming, but at the same time, she will get the be with her idol, so its a win/win for her!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kaiofire [2012-04-05 14:59:49 +0000 UTC]

cops ignore female pedophiles.

so rainbows good so long as thare are no kyles around.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to kaiofire [2012-04-05 18:32:27 +0000 UTC]

hrhr

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

original2 [2012-03-09 15:05:59 +0000 UTC]

Come on Dash, there is just too big strength disparity between you and Scoot. She adores you as a hero - be a hero for her and don't use your strength to manipulate her for your own gain.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to original2 [2012-03-09 16:42:36 +0000 UTC]

What makes you think she does this purely for her own personal gain?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

original2 In reply to CradeElcin [2012-03-09 20:33:56 +0000 UTC]

I'm not saying that Dash is acting purely for her own gain, but the pattern from our world seem to suggest gain disparity (stronger individuals often exploit weaker when trying to gain something from them, sometimes unitentionally), also RD is not very thoughtful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to original2 [2012-03-10 00:14:11 +0000 UTC]

That may be true, but who says she can't be generous from time to time?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

original2 In reply to CradeElcin [2012-03-10 19:48:07 +0000 UTC]

Rainbow probably can be generous, but at this time i don't see how RD could be selfless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fiktionsfragan [2012-02-26 19:06:40 +0000 UTC]

WAITWAITWAIT
Why is this in a bunch of shipping groups?
Oh god, you're into paedophilia, aren't you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to Fiktionsfragan [2012-02-26 20:22:35 +0000 UTC]

If you can talk about pedophilia in my case, yeah, probably.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fiktionsfragan In reply to CradeElcin [2012-02-26 20:27:31 +0000 UTC]

You're a fan of paedophilia?
Wow.

Like, seriously? Not even ashamed of it? You're the scum of this earth after all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to Fiktionsfragan [2012-02-26 20:32:01 +0000 UTC]

well, I'm 16. Thats why I dont think you can say I am a pedophile. And I don't know if ponies go under that term. Maybe it's just that I am a fick suck and I like to corrupt things.

But no, I'm not ashamed of it. Pedophiles are only the scum of the earth, coz you people are making them this. Most hardcore pedophiles are always depressed, because they did not decide "I want little girls", they are just attracted to them and, if it goes really bad, ONLY them.

People should finally get, that even pedophiles are normal people, who mother nature played a very cruel trick on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fiktionsfragan In reply to CradeElcin [2012-02-26 20:44:59 +0000 UTC]

You think paedophiles are okay?
You must not know why it's illegal in the first place. Paedophiles are basically the same as rapists.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to Fiktionsfragan [2012-02-26 21:13:28 +0000 UTC]

No they are not. It just happens to be that pedophilia is illegal. Not even pedophilia is illegal, but having the actual intercourse, not even consensual is allowed, as far as i can tell. People who are solely attracted to children (something they have NO control over and something they are NOT responsible for) resort to rape, because they are not being satisfied by adult men or women. But not all pedophiles, even if they are hardcore-pedophiles, resort to rape, only the really frustrated.
Being a pedophile is like being gay, only pedophilia is not allowed because of moral reasons.
And i get that, I'm not saying it should be allowed. I'm saying, heads up. They are people. People, who have a sexual preference, that is not respected in the system we partake in now. They are not evil.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

original2 In reply to CradeElcin [2012-03-11 14:50:21 +0000 UTC]

I think age of consent has some sense as approximation of age at which a person has knowledge of what is sex drive, knowledge of consequences of entering sexual relationship and strength to assess it and refuse it. When an adult tries to enters sexual relationship with a person without one of this traits it has potential to be immoral and harmful act. If i get a consent from a young child to trade his watch for a coin worth very little, it surely doesn't make this trade fair.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to original2 [2012-03-11 15:45:33 +0000 UTC]

magical ponies

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fiktionsfragan In reply to CradeElcin [2012-02-27 09:01:42 +0000 UTC]

"Pedophilia is not allowed because of moral reason"
But that's wrong you dumbass. It's because paedophilia is basically the same thing as rape. A kid's too stupid to give consent to an adult, it's the same reason we can't go around raping the mentally handicapped.
But this is besides the point isn't it? You think paedophiles are okay, when they're a danger to our kids. There's no such thing as consent with paedophiles, so there's nothing good with them. They like kids and they like rape.

Also, this has nothing to do with the issue. You said that you're into paedophilia, and you have yet to say that you aren't. You disgust me, how can you look at kids that way?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to Fiktionsfragan [2012-02-27 13:38:58 +0000 UTC]

>But that's wrong you dumbass.
No, it is not. That pedophiles are rapist is an assumption, not a fact. Like I stated, there are times in the human history that sex with children was allowed, it was not morally wrong there in any way. From our standpoint today, it is. It's a synthesis of morals. In a few hundred years we might get back to that behavior, that we now find deplorable.
Rape is bad. I'm not saying rape isn't bad. I'm just saying there is a difference between sexual attraction and rape.
>Also, this has nothing to do with the issue
You say Pedophiles are the same as rapist. I say they are desperate for love they can't get and that they are not evil. Not all pedophiles are rapists. It has something to with these issue, because if you would think a little bit differently, you would see me differently, too.

>You said that you're into pedophilia, and you have yet to say that you aren't.
Well, when I say I'm into pedophilia, wouldn't be saying "I'm not" a paradox.

>You disgust me, how can you look at kids that way?
If you actually think you can CURE a sexual attraction, then I'm going to have to ask you to leave the Internet.
I already told you something, that I keep a secret most times, while browsing the web, simply because it does not really matter. In this situation it does, that is why I am telling you this. I am still underage, I am 16. If you can say that this is pedophilia, then yes, I am a pedophile.
That's a moral dilemma here, that isn't easy to solve. When am I forbidden to fantasize about other humans, my age and a little bit down? In my headcanon, Scootaloo is 12-13. Is this morally alright?
But when am I actually forbidden to fantasize about anything? Am I no longer allowed to fantasize about things, that the general public finds deplorable? If I fantasize about rape, do I rape someone? If I fantasize about killing my headteacher, do I actually kill him? If I fantasize about burning down my school, do I actually do it?
No. Thoughts don't hurt anybody. And my art (if you can call it that at this point) reflects my thoughts.

Also, there is no rape in this picture, no child is molested or raped. This relationship I am picturing here is consensual. Look at the picture again, imagine what the characters are thinking. Then you'll see that this picture does NOT resemble any of the traits you find incorrect and accuse me of.
And please, stop spreading hate and insulting people, that were not insulting to you. Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fiktionsfragan In reply to CradeElcin [2012-02-28 01:43:12 +0000 UTC]

I like how throughout the entire reply you didn't adress the issue that paedophilia actually is rape. If the kid can't give consent in a logical manner, of course it's rape. The same reason it's rape with the mentally handicapped. There's no such thing as consent with paedophiles, since the kid can't give consent.

"Well, when I say I'm into pedophilia, wouldn't be saying "I'm not" a paradox."
Wait, there you basically tell me you're a paedophile.
Fuck you.
I can't believe you people.

You're into kids? How can you? I hope you control yourself so no kids get hurt because of your actions. Fuck you, seriously. You act as if there's nothing wrong with it either. If you're 16, and your partner is 12, how is that alright in any sense of the word? I can't believe you. You actually feel attracted to twelve-year olds?
I seriously hope you don't act upon your feelings, I seriously hope you don't hurt any kids.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to Fiktionsfragan [2012-02-28 06:45:51 +0000 UTC]

>you didn't adress the issue that paedophilia actually is rape.
You just did not read my post that is all.
No. No it is not. Because the sexual attraction does not include the sexual act. Like I told you a bigillion times.
Now, if EVERY pedophile would have sex with a child, then yes, it would be rape. But it isn't, because not every pedophile acts after their own urges, they don't do that for the sake of the society, because they are actually decent people.

>You're into kids? How can you?
Here you go again, completely not reading my post, not understanding ANYTHING I say, but still feel like you are in the position to find a compelling argument. Even though, you basically have the SAME argument every single post, and every time I try to bring up new facts that would take this discussion further, you don't even attempt to bring them up.
Like I said:
If you think sexual attractions are a matter of choice, you are a sad person, sir.

>If you're 16, and your partner is 12, how is that alright in any sense of the word?
You're telling me? When are children "able" to feel love for each other? When are children "able" to be consensual? With 15? That's bullcrap, because I had a girlfriend with 13, that I loved to death.
Seriously, I ASKED YOU THIS LAST POST. You could've answered, but I think you just want to hate something, without thinking twice. And what better thing to hate, than pedophiles, because "they are the scum of the earth".

Like seen here:

>Fuck you.
>Fuck you, seriously.
I wrote: "And please, stop spreading hate and insulting people, that were not insulting to you. Thank you."
You did not read my entire post.

You know what? Screw this. You obviously don't want to accept any other viewpoint, than your own screwed up way of thinking. Open Mindedness is an unfamiliar word for you. I went over your comments on your profile and noticed, that it does not make sense to argue with you. Every argument you had until now goes in the same direction ours have gone. You don't care for any argument, accuse people of being something they aren't, because it helps demonizing your opposition, you drop insults left and right ...

You know. Like a good christian.

I think you are the one who needs help here. I hope you go back to school, not some christian school, but a real school, where they teach you tolerance, respect, how to discuss a topic, how to accept people as they are, with their flaws, and that you are not allowed to judge people until you know them.
Actually, your religion should've thought you this, but your religion always tells you only the most convenient things, right?

Because you probably didn't read this, here's the synopsis:
++++
You disgust me more, than any pedophile ever could. Please don't respond, or I'll have to block you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fiktionsfragan In reply to CradeElcin [2012-02-29 07:30:16 +0000 UTC]

So, whatever I say you're going to block me? That sounds mature.
Well then, no need to put any effort into this then. I just want to say that I hope that no kids will get hurt because of your sexual preference. Please restrain yourself from hurting children.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to Fiktionsfragan [2012-02-29 08:06:34 +0000 UTC]

>That sounds mature.

I am currently acting on the same maturity level as you are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KommunistKensei [2011-12-01 21:47:05 +0000 UTC]

Scoot: Um, dash, why does your breath smell like alcohol?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to KommunistKensei [2011-12-01 23:36:59 +0000 UTC]

RD: Dammn it, scoots, stop tawwwkin....
[End of scene]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thps48 [2011-11-30 04:24:34 +0000 UTC]

Drinking as usual, I see!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to thps48 [2011-12-01 23:36:17 +0000 UTC]

Rainbow Dash being an alcoholic is an excellent viewpoint for this picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TITANOSAUR [2011-11-28 05:13:12 +0000 UTC]

High Teck: Rainbow Dash! Don't you know what 'Jail Bait' Is!?!?

Rainbow Dash: Bro, Relax! I'm just havin a little fun with her!

High Teck: By Celestia's Horn!

Rainbow Dash: Dude, Seriously. I See you drooling over Princess Luna all the time! besides your like a few THOUSAND YEARS Younger then her! And don't get me started with you staring at me and Twilight's flanks the other day.

High Teck: Thats Diffrent though! Scootaloo is a filly still yet! She hasn't even gotten her cutie mark yet!

Rainbow Dash: Yeah, I know. I'm just giving her a little... incouragement.

High Teck: Your Just..... Bah I'm gonna go home and clop!

Rainbow Dash: Um... Okay.... it better not be Me or Twilight you think about while your doing it!

High Teck: *almost over the horizon* No, This time it'll be AJ! Maybe both Princesses this time!

oops got a bit carried away.

yeah Rainbow, look for somepony more your age.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to TITANOSAUR [2011-11-28 10:57:54 +0000 UTC]

But why, if it works? ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PunkRoctorok [2011-11-28 03:24:26 +0000 UTC]

Wait what just happened?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to PunkRoctorok [2011-11-28 10:57:21 +0000 UTC]

Ask Scootaloo?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArcLightKey [2011-11-27 20:15:39 +0000 UTC]

... Would that be considered child molestation? In any case, Scootaloo would have to say something to get Dash in trouble, so I'm sure they won't be noticed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to ArcLightKey [2011-11-27 22:51:00 +0000 UTC]

Well, it is not molestation if Scootaloo likes it.
But yeah, it would be pretty awkward to say the least if somepony found out. But I think Scoots can keep her mouth shut.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mazzyrazzy In reply to CradeElcin [2011-11-28 21:46:49 +0000 UTC]

Actually it is still molestation even if Scootaloo likes it xP Child Consent Laws man.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to Mazzyrazzy [2011-11-28 22:00:46 +0000 UTC]

well, yeah, but its no moral molestation.
And, well, I think RD has something for foals. Dunno why. *shrugpic.jpg*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

supernatural90 [2011-11-27 19:38:15 +0000 UTC]

finally no one does scootaloo and rainbow dash shipping!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to supernatural90 [2011-11-27 22:51:11 +0000 UTC]

I always wonder why.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

supernatural90 In reply to CradeElcin [2011-11-27 23:31:56 +0000 UTC]

its such a cute couple, i think its the age difference.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to supernatural90 [2011-11-28 11:04:56 +0000 UTC]

It is definitely the age difference. But, fuck it, I ship em, end of story.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

supernatural90 In reply to CradeElcin [2011-11-28 21:00:29 +0000 UTC]

im suprised there isnr a ffroup out there about them. it bothers me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to supernatural90 [2011-11-28 22:01:45 +0000 UTC]

well, its still foalcon, and looked down upon in this fandom xD
I don't think there are that many fans of ScootaDash anyways...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

supernatural90 In reply to CradeElcin [2011-11-28 22:04:03 +0000 UTC]

too bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JudgementMaster [2011-11-27 19:02:19 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rainbowdash5 [2011-11-27 18:40:13 +0000 UTC]

LOLL!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CradeElcin In reply to rainbowdash5 [2011-11-27 18:48:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DrowningInTheStars [2011-11-27 18:20:52 +0000 UTC]

Rainbow: Yeah, no big deal. Is kinda awesome though. "we see eachother"

Scootaloo: Eh. I. I. I'm so excited. I can't even squee. did my heart just stop? OH MY GOD I LOVE YOU RAINBOW DASH BUT I AM TOO EXCITED TO SAY ANYTHIANG ARKULLYIDGS "..."

👍: 0 ⏩: 0