Comments: 43
bladevstwilight [2013-07-20 00:37:54 +0000 UTC]
You do know most old movies that are listed as B-movies at this time wasn't B-movies years ago ,right?
Anyway I like this mini comic strip you got just for I wasn't expecting that joke
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to bladevstwilight [2013-08-08 21:12:52 +0000 UTC]
I didn't know that. You think Planet of the Apes was considered A-level when it was released?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bladevstwilight In reply to CuttingRoom [2013-08-09 19:10:21 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure I was just stating a fact on movies was all seeing as the day I posted that comment I had came across people calling alot of old movies B-level when I know most wasn't
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CuttingRoom In reply to Asagi-K-Kurosaki [2011-08-15 22:26:53 +0000 UTC]
That's what I keep hearing, I've really got to check it out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thewarlord900 [2011-08-08 06:22:24 +0000 UTC]
Does the Planet of The Apes need a reboot?
(Rise of The Apes dose amazingly well)
Told ya.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to thewarlord900 [2011-08-08 12:58:51 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and admit that I'm wrong on this one. In a world where movies so often butcher good ideas, they somehow took a crap idea and made it good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lootapotta [2011-08-06 11:22:02 +0000 UTC]
I saw the trailer and immediately thought: there aren't enough apes in the zoo for that to even hypothetically happen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to lootapotta [2011-08-08 12:59:34 +0000 UTC]
Right. I wonder how they recruit for the Ape army? An add on myspace? I think not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thewarlord900 [2011-08-03 21:52:19 +0000 UTC]
I heard the movie is getting fantastic reviews, even being called the best film of the year so far!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to thewarlord900 [2011-08-04 13:12:32 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I've heard that too. It's pretty crazy, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thewarlord900 In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-08-04 16:31:03 +0000 UTC]
Yeah! And so far it has a im not kidding
88% on Rotten Tomatoes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to thewarlord900 [2011-08-05 17:27:49 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I've seen some of the reviews. Seems like the best reboot since Casino Royale.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
miha9000 [2011-07-21 22:34:38 +0000 UTC]
added to comic books in Sci-fi archives
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Razgriz-Ghost22 [2011-07-21 16:02:43 +0000 UTC]
It's more than a prequel it's a reboot which I think is amazing because the series was kind of cheesy. Even the remake with Mark Wahlberg was just ok. I think this movie will be a great foundation for a series that our generation can appreciate.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to Razgriz-Ghost22 [2011-07-22 02:03:34 +0000 UTC]
But why not do something original instead? I mean, why tie it to a movie that it probably doesn't want to be associated with?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Razgriz-Ghost22 In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-07-22 19:39:39 +0000 UTC]
Because there is an opportunity to reset the series so that it may gain a new following?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Razgriz-Ghost22 In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-07-25 23:04:52 +0000 UTC]
Maybe, more than likely they'll reboot the whole series once there is a bigger fanbase.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to Razgriz-Ghost22 [2011-07-26 03:34:25 +0000 UTC]
Which brings me to my previous question of why not do something original?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Razgriz-Ghost22 In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-07-26 14:37:02 +0000 UTC]
You know what, they have money end of story. That's why they're making the film because they have money and can probably make more money by making said movie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to Razgriz-Ghost22 [2011-07-27 16:50:48 +0000 UTC]
Who's they?
While I'm not a fan of James Cameron, he's showed that you can make ridiculously successful movies that aren't adaptions, sequels, prequels, requels, reboots, or remakes of previously seen stories. Why aren't more people doing that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Razgriz-Ghost22 In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-07-27 17:25:41 +0000 UTC]
The film-makers. I was just tired of the circular argument, IE.
Why make it
Because it's a reboot
Why
Because it can start a new ground for the series
Why...
The movie is being made as a starting point for a new planet of the apes series as far as I can tell. If it wasn't planet of the apes what would it be? Ape Planet?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to Razgriz-Ghost22 [2011-07-28 19:36:55 +0000 UTC]
I'm not 100% positive, but I imagine the film makers behind this project had nothing to do with the original. And all I'm saying is that rather than generating their own ideas, they went back to some particularly dated source material, and I think that's lame. I'd love to see more risk taking in Hollywood.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sordcooper2 [2011-07-05 17:54:25 +0000 UTC]
...wasnt this movie already made... like 30 years ago or something?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to sordcooper2 [2011-07-06 20:27:31 +0000 UTC]
The original was 30 years ago. This is a prequel. And there's something really weird about doing a prequel to a movie that old. The past ends up looking more futuristic than the future.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sordcooper2 In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-07-06 21:04:07 +0000 UTC]
...no, no it cant be a prequel, because the original franchise told the story of the ape future, how it got blown up, how 3 apes got sent to the past before getting offed before having their child dumped with a circus, how the sentient apes raised up against humanity, then how history kinda splintered off from the original time line... i mean shit its pretty friggen self contained so this shit would have to be just another re-make!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to sordcooper2 [2011-07-07 11:16:54 +0000 UTC]
Weird. So it's a closed loop? Which movie was the time travel in?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sordcooper2 In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-07-07 14:16:33 +0000 UTC]
the time travel was the first 3, astronauts go to the future int he first two, apes go to the past in the third, the remake is just kinda dumb all because of one very, VERY dumb twist at the end
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to sordcooper2 [2011-07-07 22:08:05 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I actually spent some real time thinking on that twist, and it made no kinds of sense unless he went back in time instead of forward.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SavvyRed [2011-07-05 16:13:57 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry, but this prequel looks terrible.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to SavvyRed [2011-07-06 20:24:00 +0000 UTC]
I'm certainly not going to defend it. The idea is so bad that the execution would have to be brilliant in order to make the movie mediocre.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SavvyRed In reply to CuttingRoom [2011-07-07 02:55:06 +0000 UTC]
That is so true. There's just something about a group of apes taking over the world that screams "cheesy!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to SavvyRed [2011-07-07 11:17:21 +0000 UTC]
Right. For me the real crime is making a prequel to a movie that's older than I am.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ElectricGecko [2011-07-01 01:07:08 +0000 UTC]
Groan. How can they STILL be making Planet of the Apes movies? STILL? Who found this concept appealing? Ever?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CuttingRoom In reply to ElectricGecko [2011-07-04 10:26:39 +0000 UTC]
Amen, but I tell you, the trailer looks strangely appealing to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0