HOME | DD

daboomonline — The Lloyds Building

Published: 2008-01-07 14:21:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 438; Favourites: 1; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Description This is a very cool looking building. All pipework is external allowing for easy maintainance. It is also made mostly of metal and has a very futuristic look to it. The elevators are all external and the only part of the original Lloyds building is a tiny part of the front wall.

--

I recently went on a photo shoot in London for my Photography project on architecture. Here are some of the better shots.
Related content
Comments: 15

MiCephei [2008-01-07 14:42:23 +0000 UTC]

Amazing photo! I also have the Nikon D40, Not used to it yet haha, too many functions xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MiCephei In reply to MiCephei [2008-01-07 18:18:04 +0000 UTC]

haha yeah me too, but as I said, not used to it, I'm good with macro photography, however it's tricky with the D40 because you require a better lense ... however I love using the exposure settings (which are great) you can photograph drips of water and insane speed, too bad you can't be close up AND take a high speed photo (macro lenses don't support shutter speed I don't think) xD

but you do have amazing skill with the D40 I love the exposure in your photographs, perfect.

Teach me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daboomonline In reply to MiCephei [2008-01-07 19:31:10 +0000 UTC]

One thing I would recommend is getting your hands on a copy of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom or another RAW image processing app.

In there you can tweak exposure, contrast and even saturation. In fact, I believe that the D40 has some processing functions built in but I don't know how to use those.

If you want to see what Lightroom can do, head over to Adobe Photoshop Lightroom killer Tips [link] and watch some of the videos to see what it can do. (I think it can make any image look good)

As for macro, I don't know much about it but I have tried using the macro function on my camera in the past (here is an example [link] )

If you are looking at buying a macro lens but find them too expensive, see if you can find a Canon close-up lens (canon makes them for both Canon and Nikon lenses). It will take your 18-55 mm zoom lens and will make it a macro zoom lens plus costs a fraction of the price of an actual 18-55 mm macro lens.

Anyways, I'm going back to school tomorrow and I still have work to do so...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MiCephei In reply to daboomonline [2008-01-07 19:42:52 +0000 UTC]

Ah so if I find a canon close-up lense, how would I know if it fits in my Nikon?
How much was yours?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daboomonline In reply to MiCephei [2008-01-07 21:53:36 +0000 UTC]

I don't have one. Jessops sell one for £30 which should fit on the D40 (it has 52mm thread size anyway) here is the link (tiny url): [link]

If you do get one, check that it will work before you buy. I don't want bad things to happen

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MiCephei In reply to daboomonline [2008-01-08 02:50:16 +0000 UTC]

hahaha thanks for the tip man!
I still dont understand this mm thing, I get confused, the higher the mm size... the... closer to the object it can go? or what I'm confused haha

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daboomonline In reply to MiCephei [2008-01-08 16:15:26 +0000 UTC]

The standard lens on the D40 is 18-55mm. 18mm is the wide angle end and the 55mm is the telephoto end. This value is called the focal length. As the focal length increases, the more zoomed in the picture will be. For example, when photographing birds, the pros will usually use a lens like a 400-600mm to get in closer with the subject. How close you can go is defined by the focusing range of a lens. I don't know what range the D40 has. What a close up lens does is change how light enters your lens, which allows you to focus on closer objects. I should mention that close up lenses are just like regular filters (UV, Polarizing, etc) and they just screw on the end of your existing lens. The thread size determines what diameter filters you can attach. The D40 lens is 52mm thread size (I think).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MiCephei In reply to daboomonline [2008-01-08 19:56:56 +0000 UTC]

ah I see! wow that pretty much sums everything up thanks!
how long have you been working with photography.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daboomonline In reply to MiCephei [2008-01-08 21:19:47 +0000 UTC]

About me? I have been doing photography since about 2005 starting with my dads digital camera. Eventually I bought my own but it didn't provide artistic controls such as depth of field, manual focus etc... which is why I bought the D40. I have been doing photography this year as one of my AS subjects (along with Maths, Physics and Biology which is a strange combo). Recently, my school finished a new art/design center and the new photography department got a stack of new iMacs all running Photoshop CS3. Before that, we had all been doing film work with a darkroom which is limiting to me because I am so much better with digital than film. Now that the new computers are installed, I am focusing more on digital because, that's how I like to work

The dark room is fun though but mistakes are likely and sometimes whole films are ruined. There is no chance of that happening with digital tho Final prints are also of a higher quality when you don't have scratches or chemical stains on the negatives. It just sucks that I still have to do some traditional darkroom stuff for my projects

Anyways, how long have you been shooting stuff?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MiCephei In reply to daboomonline [2008-01-09 01:26:09 +0000 UTC]

well not long to be honest, there were times where I would do lots of photography, then other times when I didnt do any. however now I do a lot of photography now that I have the D40, however it takes so long to get to know how to use, I'm still very lost, I still have no idae how to take 4000 pictures in one second (Sure it can be done, it's a D40 hahaha). and yeah I also take a Photography class at college (it's a part of my national diploma in interactive media) and so far I am getting pretty good grades for the subject. the college I go to allows me to borrow the D70 camera whenever I want, and thats like.... amazing xD. so that's really cool! do you have like, a large selection of lenses? because by the looks of your work, you're VERY experianced in how you take photo's and what aparatus you use to take it (settings, lenses... etc.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daboomonline In reply to MiCephei [2008-01-09 12:27:48 +0000 UTC]

The only special lenses I have are for a Pentax Spotmatic F (Screwmount) and consist of a 400mm telephoto and an 85-205mm zoom. Niether of them are particularly good and I don't use them often. They both have problems with the glass too: one has mould growing on it and the other's coating has broken down. They are also very slow, meaning that you have to use a long exposure (not good in winter). I would not reccomend them to anyone. The only other lenses I have are the standard D40 lens and the standard lens for the Spotmatic F. None of my images in my gallery have used the other lenses.

As for the D70, I don't know mutch about it. Does it output better pictures than the D40?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MiCephei In reply to daboomonline [2008-01-09 14:14:58 +0000 UTC]

I havent gotten to use the D70 much... But I highly (emphasis on the word highly) doubt there is much difference at all... As for lenses, I really don't know sizes, theres loads of specs using sizes for lenses and I don't know which ones are good, theres thead size telephoto size zoom size, I really don't understand it at all... I guess I'll catch on later in time.

but at the moment, I am very curious to know if the D40/70 can take a couple of hundred photo's a second...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daboomonline In reply to MiCephei [2008-01-10 16:42:03 +0000 UTC]

Probably not. The D40's frame rate is 2.5 fps. Not sure about D70

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MiCephei In reply to daboomonline [2008-01-11 03:32:16 +0000 UTC]

oh.... thats really slow hahaha

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

daboomonline In reply to MiCephei [2008-01-07 16:55:45 +0000 UTC]

Cool. I got mine a few days after Christmas and I have only just had good enough weather to shoot in. I love the D40

👍: 0 ⏩: 0