Comments: 29
dedefrasson [2008-08-13 05:29:20 +0000 UTC]
ThatΓ‘ my favorite amog all of your gall
π: 0 β©: 1
euphoniummusicman [2008-06-13 17:40:44 +0000 UTC]
I like the view.
Proud to be a watcher!
Great photo.
π: 0 β©: 1
stomachlinedinlace [2008-06-13 12:10:55 +0000 UTC]
looks like its wearing little striped socks.
What kind of flower is that, btw?
π: 0 β©: 1
dalantech In reply to stomachlinedinlace [2008-06-13 12:18:31 +0000 UTC]
No idea on the flower -it grows wild around here.
π: 0 β©: 0
alsebka [2008-06-13 09:25:12 +0000 UTC]
really nice shot! my brother owns the 60mm ... but im not shure if i want to get this too....
π: 0 β©: 1
Rom3o [2008-06-13 07:57:53 +0000 UTC]
beautiful vibrant & rich colours.
nice shot, how come iso 400?
π: 0 β©: 1
dalantech In reply to Rom3o [2008-06-13 09:18:00 +0000 UTC]
Butterflies are hot wired to react to changes in light and are so fast that they will jump in the space between the pre-flash that the camera uses for TTL metering and the main flash -just milliseconds...
So I never use a flash to shoot butterflies, and I want to keep the shutter speed high to avoid motion blur (the wind blowing the flower, the butterfly moving as it feeds, etc.). In the early morning light, with the sun back lighting the critter (can't cast a shadow over it or it's gone) the shutter speeds will be too low if I'm shooting at ISO 100. I set the camera to shutter priority, 1/320 to 1/400, the ISO to 400, and I let the aperture fall where it will. Controlling depth in a shot like that one isn't important -unless I want to go for a very shallow area of focus and then I'd set the camera to aperture priority and the Fstop to 4 and the ISO to 200 (just to keep the shutter speeds high). Always some sort of trade off...
π: 0 β©: 1
dalantech In reply to Rom3o [2008-06-13 10:17:30 +0000 UTC]
Keep practicing -and expect to delete a lot of frames...
π: 0 β©: 0