HOME | DD

DarthFar — Photo 51

Published: 2008-09-30 18:04:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 1683; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 63
Redirect to original
Description Rosalind Elsie Franklin (25 July 1920 – 16 April 1958), English chemist and X-ray crystallographer.

Nowadays when the subject of DNA structure comes up, one immediately thinks of James Watson and Francis Crick. While their work in revealing the structure of DNA must certainly be acknowledged, there is a third name that should rightly be associated with the discovery: Rosalind Franklin.

Known best for her x-ray crystallography expertise and work on coal, graphite and the Tobacco Mosaic Virus, Franklin was the one who worked out the two different forms of DNA. By developing a method for separating the two forms, Franklin made a number of important discoveries, chief among them that the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA was on the outside of the molecule (and not inside, as previously thought), and that the helical structure of DNA had two strands, not three. Her x-ray diffraction photograph of crystalline B-form DNA is simply known as Photo 51, and is described as "amongst the most beautiful x-ray photographs of any substance ever taken."

The structure of DNA had almost been completely deciphered, but for one missing piece of the puzzle: how the bases paired up inside the helix.

Following John Randall's presentation of Franklin's data and unpublished conclusions at a routine seminar, her fellow researcher Maurice Wilkins showed the results to Watson and Crick, without either Randall or Franklin's knowledge. Based on Wilkins' help in deciphering the photograph and chemical information supplied by chemist Jerry Donohue, James Watson was able to work out the missing piece. Watson and Crick's write-up of the structure of DNA was published in the April 1953 edition of Nature, alongside Franklin's own report. Franklin was never aware of the fact that the duo had had access to her results. [Francis Crick later estimated that she might have worked out the complete structure on her own in three months, had they not gotten hold of her data.]

Watson and Crick won the 1962 Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine for their work "concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids and its significance for information transfer in living material". By then, Franklin had been dead for four years, from ovarian cancer. She was 37 years old.

-------------------------------------------

Technical Notes:

Colour pencils (ivory, brown, Vandyke brown, black, touch of vermillion) on brown card. It seemed a crime to draw her portrait in technicolour, and an even greater one with digital paint!! Yes, it's meant to look faded (I really wanted the colours to "emerge" from the paper and not pop out of it); this is actually pretty close to my original version, only my scanner inexplicably gave the picture a pink glow that I could not remove.
Related content
Comments: 63

Dragonfly22 [2009-07-03 18:09:25 +0000 UTC]

Wow, so this is the traditional stuff you were talking about! You are very good, don't worry about the pink tones the scanner added, it gives it a more feminine look.

And well, in science it happens a lot that the people serve as stair steps to others in the future, so that makes it hard to accredit one or the other. You know, another woman who I really admire is Marie Curie, I think she was one of the people who inspired me to become a physicist. Now I feel like drawing her, too! Excellent work, once again, my respects to you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tigeysrock [2008-10-14 22:59:38 +0000 UTC]

i'm doing a report about her XP

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to tigeysrock [2008-11-18 11:59:53 +0000 UTC]

That's great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FalconFan [2008-10-07 21:50:09 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful--and educational! I myself had never heard of Franklin before--thank you so much for enlightening me with not only your beautiful art, but the article that accompanies it! It's a sensitive portrayal of an unsung heroine of science--she really was quite beautiful--and a wonderful way to share your knowledge of the subject. Amazing use of color for atmosphere (and I agree with everyone else--the sepia tones and brownish paper are perfect for this!)--awesome piece!

FF

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to FalconFan [2008-10-08 02:46:47 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much, FF. She really did look as if she belonged in the movies, didn't she? That was my first impression, anyway, when I first saw her photo (back when I studied about her in college, before I found pictures, I thought she was this dowdy, late middle-aged woman). She was beautiful *and* smart. It's quite a tragedy that she died that young.

There are so many people out there who are drawing pictures of famous people, that I thought I'd take the "less-travelled path" and expose some people who *should* have their share of the spotlight but don't. That said, I fully intend to draw Barbara McClintock sometime in the near future.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrokenFate117 [2008-10-03 05:03:53 +0000 UTC]

Excellent artwork, as usual. Great mini-bio as well!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to BrokenFate117 [2008-10-03 09:59:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much! I'm glad you enjoyed the read.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrokenFate117 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-06 04:04:34 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tatooine92 [2008-10-01 21:09:48 +0000 UTC]

That's beautiful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to Tatooine92 [2008-10-02 11:00:59 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Steph!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tatooine92 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-05 00:53:06 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dabull04 [2008-10-01 16:51:54 +0000 UTC]

Stunning as always

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to Dabull04 [2008-10-01 17:38:01 +0000 UTC]

Hope it tickled your funny bone.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dabull04 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-02 07:41:31 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NatalieKelsey [2008-10-01 12:42:46 +0000 UTC]

It turned out beautifully and I like the pink glow. Also, I love learning stuff from you, you explain with passion and accurateness a school teacher doesn't often display.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to NatalieKelsey [2008-10-01 16:46:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, Nan. I'm glad you found this educational. I think I've found a niche: drawing stuff (almost) nobody else will touch, but has a good story people should know about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NatalieKelsey In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 19:40:48 +0000 UTC]

THAT is the perfect niche for you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

davincipoppalag [2008-10-01 00:15:18 +0000 UTC]

Well done Far!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to davincipoppalag [2008-10-01 03:33:52 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, David.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davincipoppalag In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 12:11:16 +0000 UTC]

Welcome sir

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FracturedReality [2008-09-30 20:35:31 +0000 UTC]

I hate to nitpick, really, I do... it's gorgeous, as usual for your stuff, but... her fingers look weird...

On the flip side, you did absolutely beautifully on the eyes... they're very expressive, and it's very easy to see that she wasn't the kind of girl who could be 'ut in her place' just cuz she was a woman (Women's Lib, woo hoo!) and DAMN those motherchuckers for stealing her work!!!

Anyhoo, awesomness, dude.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to FracturedReality [2008-10-01 03:33:25 +0000 UTC]

LOL yeah. That's my fault really - in the original picture most of her arm and her fingers "melt" into her desk in deep, dark shadows. By refusing to go that dark with my pencils, I think I kind of ruined that look. I'll see what I can do about it.

Franklin was an admirable woman. I got the impression she was one of those rough-and-tumble girls (she used to go hiking and mountain climbing), which I suppose was quite unusual back in her day. She never got the recognition she deserved back in her day, but she now has a couple of buildings and awards named after her, so I guess she won't be forgotten after all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FracturedReality In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 14:35:07 +0000 UTC]

Ahh, I get it... it's not something that would like, ruin the whole picture or anything. I just felt like picking at it so you don't get an ego or anything J/k.

Keep up the awesome work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to FracturedReality [2008-10-01 17:35:58 +0000 UTC]

Well, I've tried to darken some of the areas. I'm hoping that improves the picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

11-73-3-33 [2008-09-30 20:18:43 +0000 UTC]

So beautiful! (And I generally like drawings made by coloured pencils )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to 11-73-3-33 [2008-10-01 03:12:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! and I like colour pencil drawings too. It's just that I find it much harder to work with paper flat on the table (because my sense of perspectives gets warped) as opposed to vertically on the computer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

11-73-3-33 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 10:22:01 +0000 UTC]

Yes, that's a common problem -- only recently I've noticed that after I scanned some of my drawings they looked odd on the screen, and only then I understood that it's because when I draw I look at them from a little different angle
Anyway, since then I think more about looking from above the table at what I'm drawing.
When I was younger I usually used an easel, but it's inconvenient for drawings which are either small or made with coloured pencils.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to 11-73-3-33 [2008-10-01 14:33:15 +0000 UTC]

LOL! I used to stink at portraits, but I could never understand why. It was only after I made the transition to digital that I realised that my brain isn't capable of processing image information properly when it's lying horizontally.

And yeah, easels are awful for any media that requires pressure. You should try digital sometime. You'd be surprised at how much your perception of perspectives becomes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

11-73-3-33 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 15:26:23 +0000 UTC]

Actually, I've been thinking of trying digital, but there are two problems: The less significant one -- I don't know how to use any program (But it's possible to learn) And the more serious one: I don't have a tablet, and I suppose it is quite hard with a mouse.
When did you start digital?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to 11-73-3-33 [2008-10-01 18:59:38 +0000 UTC]

LOL, well, I learnt to use my programme from scratch simply by poking and prodding around. I could never get the hang of tutorials. I use Corel PhotoPaint, but there are a lot of decent free programmes around like ArtRage and Gimp. Or you could always sign up at an Oekaki site like 2draw.net.

And no worries. There are plenty of awesome digital artists here who paint with the humble mouse. Go check out and 's galleries, and be inspired.

When did I start... Uh, that would be December 2005? I signed up at a Star Wars site around the time, and was inspired by the artwork I found there to learn to draw and paint properly. I could already draw (badly) at the time, but that was pretty much when I started learning to paint, LOL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

11-73-3-33 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 19:09:56 +0000 UTC]

It's definitely very impressive. I'm signing into 2draw.net to try it

Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to 11-73-3-33 [2008-10-02 12:18:03 +0000 UTC]

Excellent!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

11-73-3-33 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-02 12:42:30 +0000 UTC]

It's hard to draw with the mouse
I suppose it's because I'm not used to techniques that can help in this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to 11-73-3-33 [2008-10-03 09:48:53 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it takes a steadier hand to paint a smooth curve. On the other hand, you could definitely do Seurat-style pointillism much more effectively with a mouse than with a stylus and tablet. Here, have a look at what's possible with nothing more than MS-Paint and a trackball mouse: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

11-73-3-33 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-03 10:00:56 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I've seen that painting of yours before . It's very impressive!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to 11-73-3-33 [2008-10-04 13:22:26 +0000 UTC]

LOL, it's crappy compared to some of the MS-Paint masterpieces I've seen, but yeah, I do like to use it as an example of the *minimum* you can do with a basic programme and a low-end mouse.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

11-73-3-33 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-04 13:58:08 +0000 UTC]

What is in your opinion the best cursor speed for drawing? Usually I use the maximal one (it's obvious in cases of computer games and such ) but I'm not sure which one would be most comfortable for drawing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to 11-73-3-33 [2008-10-04 14:03:06 +0000 UTC]

Uh...! That depends on your mouse's resolution, LOL. While demonstrating mouse-painting to someone a little while back, I found that tuning my 800dpi mouse to half-speed allowed me greater control of the brushes while not slowing down the process too much. I'd suggest you try painting strokes/curves at different speeds, and compare the results.

[That said, there's no way I'd even attempt to paint with my 2500dpi gaming mouse... ]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

11-73-3-33 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-04 14:28:34 +0000 UTC]

How do I find out its resolution?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to 11-73-3-33 [2008-10-04 14:45:09 +0000 UTC]

Do you still have the box it came in? I think most mice in the market these days are upwards of 800dpi, unless you're using one of those laser handheld ones. Actually, it doesn't really matter, because it's the relative speed (the speed you're most comfortable with) that counts. Try setting your mouse to the lowest speed, then increase it until you feel you can control it properly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

11-73-3-33 In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-04 15:36:52 +0000 UTC]

Well, I guess I'll just try it then

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IcyAshford [2008-09-30 20:18:02 +0000 UTC]

Ah yes, my teacher was talking about her before. They said they wanted to give her a nobel prize too but they were arguing they don't give them to dead people bla bla bla.

What do you study, by the way?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to IcyAshford [2008-10-01 03:11:16 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, they don't give out posthumous Nobel Prizes, although Watson at one time grudgingly acknowledged that Franklin deserved one.

I have a degree in microbiology.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IcyAshford In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 05:16:50 +0000 UTC]

No permanent head damage?

What do you work as? Researcher? Lecturer?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to IcyAshford [2008-10-01 06:00:28 +0000 UTC]

I got out before I sustained permanent damage. My brain's already damaged enough as it is.

Nah, I write. Science articles.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IcyAshford In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 06:03:19 +0000 UTC]

Interesting. I've never heard of such a job before.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lubyelfears [2008-09-30 19:20:30 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely beautiful. The hazy, faded tone to it really enhances the piece.

I remember learning about Franklin in GCSE science classes; an extraordinary woman.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DarthFar In reply to lubyelfears [2008-10-01 03:10:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Lu! I only learnt about Franklin in college, and even then there was a slight miscommunication regarding how Watson and Crick worked out the complete DNA structure. It was only recently that I read the whole story; I decided I had to draw her then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lubyelfears In reply to DarthFar [2008-10-01 10:01:12 +0000 UTC]

Bravo, I say! It's good to make unsung heroes like Franklin known to a wider audience, especially when it's done as wonderfully as this.

I'm sure we only learnt about her because of the fact that I attended an all girls grammar school, and they did have a penchant for teaching us about extraordinary women and their contributions to society, probably in the hopes of inspiring us.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

psychoticdustbunny [2008-09-30 19:05:11 +0000 UTC]

Women FTW!!

Thanks for the enlightenment. I really do appreciate it. Besides anyone who works with crystals and coal (diamonds in the rough) has got to be great! I know, I know. I'm an Aunt Jerkwad Bunny.

So there!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>