HOME | DD

dead-robot β€” Last flight

#22 #anime #antonov #manga #russian #soldier #uniform
Published: 2015-02-20 23:20:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 2358; Favourites: 98; Downloads: 52
Redirect to original
Description ...ok there are still some Antonov22 on duty, but this ones ends here.
I took a different angle here. There is also a fullsize version of the antonov, but i took this one,
again the balance is here better...
Related content
Comments: 43

GDupons [2021-12-29 22:39:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to GDupons [2022-01-04 21:01:30 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chloeeuphemissoledad [2016-01-09 03:18:15 +0000 UTC]

Ah, the Antheus. Biggest plane I've seen, and the NATO name is quite disturbing on one side.

Ya' better keep this up!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to chloeeuphemissoledad [2016-01-14 21:03:18 +0000 UTC]

ah.. eh... itΒ΄s the NATO Name? DidnΒ΄t know that....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

chloeeuphemissoledad In reply to dead-robot [2016-01-15 07:02:28 +0000 UTC]

The NATO name for the An-22 is "Cock". That's why it's disturbing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to chloeeuphemissoledad [2016-01-19 14:43:48 +0000 UTC]

uh.. oh.. that name is really disturbing...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Traumkratzer [2015-03-27 17:33:37 +0000 UTC]

Countless times the queen has flown the sky,
seen so many dusk and dawns, prouldy made the most out of moments and time,
the people were helped and she was loved and cared for, that makes her still smile,
but not the day has come to land to rest, nothing to prove, she has passed the test.
And so in the highest regards and respect we give her the salute, a loving memory will always be with us,
in our hearts we cherish this token, no words, no sound, it is best watched mute.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to Traumkratzer [2015-03-30 20:19:54 +0000 UTC]

Great words. Just wanted to exactly your words here.
I am very pleased for your artistic words. Again.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Traumkratzer In reply to dead-robot [2015-04-11 06:29:25 +0000 UTC]

Always a pleasure.

The most part goes to you, your works are amazing.
You combine your style with the theme harmoniously, and the ideas that come out in our gallery always have something unexpected.
Creativity gives wings!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Demosthenes-101 [2015-02-22 07:39:56 +0000 UTC]

Well in the world of Aeronautics any model that sees service is a winner. Β So many designs and styles are made that are always trying to be the next big thing in the sky. Β Cute pilot girl you put in the picture here. Β Her uniform looks like my fathers at work! (he's a steward for Delta Airlines!)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to Demosthenes-101 [2015-02-23 22:18:53 +0000 UTC]

Thanx!
The uniform is based on the russian formal military uniform. XD
But the uniforms of sky attendants are abit military.
And the next big thing is... A400M One of the beautifuliest plane ever made.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Demosthenes-101 In reply to dead-robot [2015-02-26 11:03:38 +0000 UTC]

I can't wait to see it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gnoll-El [2015-02-21 18:53:35 +0000 UTC]

Good work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to Gnoll-El [2015-02-23 22:13:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AZRA321654 [2015-02-21 13:25:00 +0000 UTC]

That noise level by those props and compressors though! Russia Masterrace!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to AZRA321654 [2015-02-23 22:13:17 +0000 UTC]

Yes!! Double rotors for the world! Thanx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S3rb4n [2015-02-21 11:42:51 +0000 UTC]

Lovely stewardess lady!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to S3rb4n [2015-02-23 22:12:41 +0000 UTC]

hm.. its more a military (formal) uniform.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S3rb4n In reply to dead-robot [2015-02-23 22:16:35 +0000 UTC]

I'm going to say Aeroflot, considering it's an Antonov plane... I guess those classic uniforms never get old!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Stargazer2112 [2015-02-21 10:12:56 +0000 UTC]

nice uniform

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to Stargazer2112 [2015-02-23 22:12:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanx! made some research in the inet.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Raoz-Spaz [2015-02-21 07:05:42 +0000 UTC]

The Antonov. One GIANT fucking plane. A lot of people think the C130 is big, but no. The Antonov takes the cake. Nicely done Robot. I look forward to seeing the next one : P I got something I need to say about it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

dead-robot In reply to Raoz-Spaz [2015-02-23 22:15:22 +0000 UTC]

I have seen the Hercules also at the same place. And yes the antonov is bigger. XD Thanx!
Ah okay.. i changed the back of the pic... Was abit wrong, if you mean that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Raoz-Spaz In reply to dead-robot [2015-02-24 03:21:25 +0000 UTC]

Its more along the lines of on the next Antonov picture, it feels like you should be able to see all 4 props, but instead can only see 3 of them. Just my opinion.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to Raoz-Spaz [2015-02-26 18:51:16 +0000 UTC]

ah.. nope thats correct, cause i used my reference and you only see the one... ^^Β°

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Raoz-Spaz In reply to dead-robot [2015-02-27 07:28:18 +0000 UTC]

Aight. I figured as much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gnoll-El In reply to Raoz-Spaz [2015-02-21 18:51:57 +0000 UTC]

That is only because a lot of people haven't heard of the C-124 Globemaster II, the C-133 Cargomaster, or the C-141 Starlifter let alone seen one.Β  Compared to them the ANT 22 is only slightly larger.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Raoz-Spaz In reply to Gnoll-El [2015-02-23 03:13:31 +0000 UTC]

Maybe in size. Not entirely certain on that, but just maybe. But in overall carrying capability, the Antonovs have them beat. Some of them are beat by nearly double. And if you bring into account the one off built Miriya, that wait difference grows by almost another 100 thousand pounds. Sure the C class cargo planes are large and as I said before, probably similar to the Antonovs (The wiki says the AN-124 has a cargo bay thats only 20% large than the C-5 Galaxy).Β  In overall workload though, which is where in my opinion a lot of the astonishment comes from, the Antonovs have the cake and ate it too. XP

[I have heard of all those planes you listed. I used to be a plane nut. Still am to some extent]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gnoll-El In reply to Raoz-Spaz [2015-02-23 19:28:01 +0000 UTC]

What annoyed me was your apples to oranges comparison of the C-130 to the AN-22.Β  Two different aircraft build to different specifications.Β  My point was that people forget, if they ever knew,Β the US was using as big of aircraft before the AN-22.Β  The C-141 has a greater payload and the C-133 had a greater take off weight than the AN-22.

As far the AN-124 and the AN-225 go, they are fine aircraft, no doubt about it, coming some ten years after the C-5,Β and the Miriya will remain the world's largest aircraft for a long time to come beingΒ about the maximum size any airport can handle.Β  Currently there is no demand for anything larger.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Raoz-Spaz In reply to Gnoll-El [2015-02-24 03:20:41 +0000 UTC]

Oh most certainly. And yeah, I do apologize for that. I didnt think to account for production times and such as to when the planes were released. Thanks to all this though, Ive gotten a bit back into my fan of planes again. Probably going to read up on all these planes. Its a bit fascinating as to what they all are used for precisely (other than the generic title they are given of heavy cargo lift aircraft)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gnoll-El In reply to Raoz-Spaz [2015-02-24 20:43:18 +0000 UTC]

Actually it is I who owe the apologize since I got my lb. mixed with my kg.Β  andΒ  the AN-22 is quite a bit bigger the either the C-133 or the C-141.Β  It must be a sign of old age.Β  How ever it is alwaysΒ good to talk with a fellow lover of aircraft.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Raoz-Spaz In reply to Gnoll-El [2015-02-24 21:29:53 +0000 UTC]

*nod nod* Indeed. Im still looking forward to some of the information coming out about the new fighter jet being developed. Not sure whether I have high hopes for it or not considering what little I have heard, it doesn't sound much different than the F-22. But who knows.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gnoll-El In reply to Raoz-Spaz [2015-02-25 21:40:03 +0000 UTC]

Which one is this?Β  US or Russian?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Raoz-Spaz In reply to Gnoll-El [2015-02-26 03:41:47 +0000 UTC]

Its a US plane. There was an article brought up on it in my local newspaper. It seems like itd be a pretty good idea, but Im not sure the costs will relate well enough to its capabilities over the F22.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Gnoll-El In reply to Raoz-Spaz [2015-02-27 18:02:21 +0000 UTC]

If you are referring to the F-35, Wikipedia has an extensive entry on it; the good and the bad.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alcione [2015-02-21 06:19:51 +0000 UTC]

se ve chido!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to alcione [2015-02-23 22:11:56 +0000 UTC]

eh.. gracias

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SgtSareth [2015-02-21 01:05:09 +0000 UTC]

Nicely done!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to SgtSareth [2015-02-23 22:11:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

koushiro1180 [2015-02-20 23:52:59 +0000 UTC]

beautiful image

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to koushiro1180 [2015-02-23 22:11:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanx!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MCMXC2 [2015-02-20 23:38:42 +0000 UTC]

Those were pretty big!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dead-robot In reply to MCMXC2 [2015-02-23 22:11:27 +0000 UTC]

yep!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0