HOME | DD

derkert โ€” Adolf as a boy

Published: 2008-12-15 19:00:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 779; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Even very bad and powerful grown ups have been small. This is Adolf Hitler as a boy. Why couldn't he have stayed this way

Digital collage by edvard derkert from 2008

see also: [link]

and [link]
Related content
Comments: 31

fraeuleinamok [2010-03-05 09:09:32 +0000 UTC]

nice! i'm glad to see i'm not the only one who ever thought about this picture of baby hitler in an arty way.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to fraeuleinamok [2010-03-05 11:13:47 +0000 UTC]

You are not alone!

What a unnecessary remark!

or to general?

or to personal!

Or?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

elmisti [2008-12-16 22:21:46 +0000 UTC]

like that, nice work

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to elmisti [2008-12-17 07:16:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

KatDiestel [2008-12-16 19:30:28 +0000 UTC]

unhappy arrogant little brat

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to KatDiestel [2008-12-17 07:16:01 +0000 UTC]

Yes

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Tordo [2008-12-16 02:39:16 +0000 UTC]

From all the things he could had become, I mean, each children can become the next Hitler or the next Einstein, we all should be aware of that.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to Tordo [2008-12-16 09:08:35 +0000 UTC]

See thwe movie the boys from brazil" and judge yourself!
ed

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

citizenfour [2008-12-15 23:41:05 +0000 UTC]

was he very hungry?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to citizenfour [2008-12-16 09:09:10 +0000 UTC]

Yes for power!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

fredfree [2008-12-15 22:19:05 +0000 UTC]

yes...if only he stayed little or made better art or got run over by a bus.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to fredfree [2008-12-15 22:36:50 +0000 UTC]

Anything would have done!
ed

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

purexmorning [2008-12-15 21:21:36 +0000 UTC]

[link]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to purexmorning [2008-12-15 21:25:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for link! Yes he should have kept up his painting. THis is why art is good for society; less madmen running around killing people off!
ed

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

schlockhausen [2008-12-15 19:42:12 +0000 UTC]

what a darling little future sociopath!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to schlockhausen [2008-12-15 21:13:47 +0000 UTC]

Go rent the the movie "the boys of Brazil!
ed

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

schlockhausen In reply to derkert [2008-12-15 21:19:17 +0000 UTC]

oh i saw that when i was a kid and it frightened me!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to schlockhausen [2008-12-15 21:22:57 +0000 UTC]

It is really quite good!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

schlockhausen In reply to derkert [2008-12-15 21:28:05 +0000 UTC]

i'll have to get it from the netflixยฎ!

did you ever see the movie Network?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to schlockhausen [2008-12-15 21:31:46 +0000 UTC]

No? Whast it about? Should I?
ed I?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

schlockhausen In reply to derkert [2008-12-15 21:48:54 +0000 UTC]

let me find a description on the web since i'm terrible at describing movies:

Synopsis: With stunning prescience, Sidney Lumet's searing satire of television and the contemporary moment chronicles media corruption and the way that the public buys into the myths the media creates. The moral and spiritual turpitude delivered by the debilitating forces of television are rendered in sharp relief against a backdrop of crumbling humanity in what is regarded as one of the great satires in Hollywood history. With a visceral script from Paddy Chayefsky, NETWORK follows the doomed path of aging newsman Howard Beale (Peter Finch), who, upon learning that he is to be fired after decades as a news anchor, announces to millions of viewers that he will publicly commit suicide during his last broadcast. When the ratings consequently shoot up, hungry executive-in-training Diana Christensen (Faye Dunaway) seizes the moment to exploit Beale's Messianic nervous breakdown, turning his rage into the vehicle for the network's first Number One show and a nationwide craze. Who could have predicted that this 1976 film might someday influence an even more contagious trend in television broadcasting: the reality show?

from Rotten Tomatoes

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to schlockhausen [2008-12-15 21:56:49 +0000 UTC]

Yes I have ssen it. In London. Yeah that one was pretty good. But that too was along time ago!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 2

derkert In reply to derkert [2008-12-16 09:52:00 +0000 UTC]

I guess I have to take another look at Network!
ed

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

schlockhausen In reply to derkert [2008-12-16 00:11:34 +0000 UTC]

when you see it now, you realize how much of it has come true. it's weird!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

landkee [2008-12-15 19:05:49 +0000 UTC]

C'est la vie!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to landkee [2008-12-15 21:14:38 +0000 UTC]

Life stinks!
ed

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

landkee In reply to derkert [2008-12-15 22:46:31 +0000 UTC]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to landkee [2008-12-15 23:10:21 +0000 UTC]

Boo hoo!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

landkee In reply to derkert [2008-12-15 23:49:19 +0000 UTC]

I think everyone* agrees - would he get accepted into art school, none of that would've happened.


* Everyone? Really? I have no idea.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

derkert In reply to landkee [2008-12-16 09:34:41 +0000 UTC]

But still โ€“ the moral must be nice to wannebe artists or the go real nuts!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

landkee In reply to derkert [2008-12-16 14:21:43 +0000 UTC]

Not that something everyone can agree on!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0