HOME | DD

DiBgd In reply to Mechatherium [2011-06-04 16:27:36 +0000 UTC]

Omnivore

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JohnFaa In reply to avancna [2011-10-27 14:24:08 +0000 UTC]

Condylarths are not considered a valid group anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

avancna In reply to JohnFaa [2011-10-27 19:27:12 +0000 UTC]

I'm using the term "condylarth" in the same manner one would use the term "ungulate"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DiBgd In reply to avancna [2010-09-01 16:56:12 +0000 UTC]

Pantodont, not condylarth! It's not an ungulate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

avancna In reply to DiBgd [2010-09-02 02:42:22 +0000 UTC]

I just reread that today, I'm so embarassed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0