Comments: 12
masonday [2012-03-21 23:10:57 +0000 UTC]
COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DinoHunter000 In reply to masonday [2012-03-22 03:58:19 +0000 UTC]
THAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANKS AGAIN!!! lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DinoHunter000 In reply to Algoroth [2011-06-29 03:51:13 +0000 UTC]
The more I read into Horner's idea, the more it kind of makes sense. I have a dvd of National Geographic's Dinosaurs Decoded and it talks about dinosaur changes through growth and it includes Triceratops. There is also a university lecture done by Horner and it shows that the huge 2meter long skulls of Triceratops were still growing! The appearance of fenestrae in the frill is also curious.... that's just my opinion though!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DinoHunter000 In reply to Algoroth [2011-06-29 03:53:21 +0000 UTC]
Yes the possible spines are very interesting. I still can't believe that after all this time we can still find more things to learn about in one of the most famous dinosaurs. The square belly scales, large scales on body, and possible spines on some of them are AMAZING to think about!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0