Comments: 18
ApertureExec101 [2016-06-26 11:59:40 +0000 UTC]
Heh looks like something ya would see roaring through the outback
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DounutCereal In reply to ApertureExec101 [2016-07-01 08:19:42 +0000 UTC]
Maybe in the Pilbara with all the iron ore trains, maybe even two of them there (It's a bit tall and probably too heavy for the national network sadly)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThunderClawShocktrix [2016-05-23 03:23:06 +0000 UTC]
here is the steam(punk) version
www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LO…
In 1954, the Norfolk & Western received a Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton and Babcock & Wilcox-built a steam-turbine-electric named "Jawn Henry" that looked similar to the C&O attempt. It was shorter, weighed less, and had a Babcock & Wilcox "marine type" water tube boiler (some sources say flash boiler) that operated at 600 psi. and delivered steam at 900 degrees F. It had Westinghouse generators and traction motors, and rode on four, three axle trucks. All axles were powered so the "Jawn Henry" was a C-C+C-C locomotive.
The name given to this locomotive, "Jawn Henry" was taken from the legendary black construction worker who pitted his hammer and drill against a steam drill and died in the attempt.
Although it could be said that the "Jawn Henry" was superior to the Y6b, it lasted only three years. There were a number of problems with 2300. Most of them were worked out during its short life. Some of these problems included the turbine blades getting out of whack when the locomotive coupled onto a train, fly ash kept getting into the electrical machinery, and problems with the feedwater heater and semi-automated boiler controls. Its major Achilles heel as the water delivery turbine and pump, which had to be constantly replaced due to high operating speed. Although none of these were a "show stopper", the locomotive was mainly used as a "pusher" and was scrapped in 1958. Perhaps if the 2300 was introduced 10 years earlier and did not have to compete against a four-unit "F" consist, it may have had a longer life.
and a few others that would count:
www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LO…
www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LO…
www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LO…
www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LO…
www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LO…
YOU MADE A HEXAPLEX next time go for an octoplex, 8 bogies with double layer span bolsters on each end XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DounutCereal In reply to ThunderClawShocktrix [2016-05-28 12:50:52 +0000 UTC]
That's a very interesting site you've found there, it had me sucked in and browsing for a surprising amount of time XD
And heh, please don't tempt me. After my last hyperdetailed build I'd hate to see how many hours I'd sink into a creation like that!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arbiter-EL14 [2015-04-01 03:06:38 +0000 UTC]
There's big trains, then there's Sorien going nuts on his train project. Here we can see the later.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DounutCereal In reply to Arbiter-EL14 [2015-04-01 10:25:33 +0000 UTC]
lol, and chances are with the next bout of insanity I wil try and make something bigger
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arbiter-EL14 In reply to DounutCereal [2015-04-01 10:32:36 +0000 UTC]
Get on the German level: www.gridclub.com/subscribers/i…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Melbournesparks [2015-01-17 05:24:36 +0000 UTC]
Haha, this is awesome! I've only just got around to looking. I like the four bogies with the span bolster. Would be interesting to see how much coupling swing is required on a 100m radius curve!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DounutCereal In reply to Melbournesparks [2015-01-17 11:18:37 +0000 UTC]
Thanks man!
I think I made it a bit unrealistic at the front though, there should probably be at least a small gangway bridge and a good half meter long coupler shank! I'd be more interested to see how far the body swing over on a tight curve though, you might get half your track peeking out from oneside of it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ParkesRailwayTV [2015-01-10 01:21:52 +0000 UTC]
Jaysus, bloody big loco!
You'r really talented in Sketchup, I'd attempt to make something like this and end up with a bunch of squares.
Looks like something that would appear in the Pilbara.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cprailes44ac [2014-12-31 22:31:56 +0000 UTC]
That thing would be rolling rails on every curve it goes around haha.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DounutCereal In reply to cprailes44ac [2015-01-01 01:21:16 +0000 UTC]
Maaaaaaaybe, but ssshhhh. No rail company needs to know about that yet, they wouldn't let me run it on their track if they knew XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0