Comments: 7
Tspuun [2008-09-01 14:07:41 +0000 UTC]
I gotta say, this one is loads better than last one you put up, although his front legs still don't look like they're attached quite right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bra1nDead In reply to DragonSean [2009-02-03 09:53:18 +0000 UTC]
i think if you drew him actually standing on something hed look better :]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DragonSean In reply to Bra1nDead [2009-02-03 17:05:12 +0000 UTC]
But that would involve some form of background! D8
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bra1nDead In reply to DragonSean [2009-02-03 23:24:18 +0000 UTC]
it will be worth it, and you dont need a really detailed anything to show hes standing on something
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SliceOfDog [2008-09-01 13:21:31 +0000 UTC]
Wow. I mean, you know I hate taurs. Of any kind. And also that style of face. But yeah, that's damn good toning. Seriously, I'm impressed. The body and arms are... ok, I'm gonna say it. Get ready. They're excellent. Like, really really good. Hell, even the face doesn't look as bad as usual. The legs kind of let it down a bit. I mean, the toning's fine, but they just seem... wrong somehow. They don't seem to bend the right way. Also, unless you drew the back legs wrong, the long bit in this pic is actually the foot. The very very short bit is the lower leg. [link]
But yeah, consider me well and truly impressed. I may even need to get a few toning tips from you later.
Wow...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DragonSean In reply to SliceOfDog [2008-09-01 13:31:28 +0000 UTC]
I know the long bit is actually part of the foot... although you actually just gave the example of a bird leg, which is built similarly, but it is still slightly different. And if you mean the front legs when you say they don't bend the right way, dog/wolf legs actually bend inwards.
But anyway, now I'm going to die, because I find it hard to accept praise that good, and when it's from you, something just breaks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0