HOME | DD

DrFrag — KL-81 Echo

Published: 2007-11-27 00:54:03 +0000 UTC; Views: 608; Favourites: 10; Downloads: 13
Redirect to original
Description a rifle that fires 8.76mm magnum rounds up to distances over +2000 meters. Its got a weak muzzle break to take off a little bit of the recoil. It has a bullpup design, which brings it's total barrel length to 37 ½". The standard rounds are steel jacketed tungsten rounds, although the FoE uses depleted uranium in place of the tungsten sometimes.

and the reason the res is higher is cause i have duel monitors now. hell yeah!
Related content
Comments: 26

Der-Kommentator [2011-05-27 04:13:34 +0000 UTC]

awesome dude

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Doomsday-Device [2009-05-14 08:14:32 +0000 UTC]

Tungsten and Uranium are very heavy metals. And, the longer a gun barrel is, the lower the muzzle velocity. Is this meant to use something above the standard 200gr?

Unless it does, it would be highly unlikely to have an accuracy range of 2000+ meters.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TalJKaar [2008-03-10 08:18:19 +0000 UTC]

If your have spent so much on time on this model wouldn't it only help you do research some theory behind semi automatic weapons. It isn't quite a bullpup the reason being is that both the action and mag have to be behind the trigger assembly, thus elongating the length of the barrel to the relative size of the gun.

there isn't enough room in your action for shell ejection and reloading or the trigger assembly to do anything. The lack of any kind of recoil reduction beside a break mean your firing a large round through a pipe, your arm would be shot buy the time you need to reload and your scope is fubar. The picatinny rail for your scope is entirly too long, if your shooting 2000+ meters you might want a scope with better optics than that wee thing on there. At uber best it could be a 15-20x and at a mile your looking at ants still. also if you look into some positions used by snipers youd note that usually one arm is tucked under the chest holding the stock and the other on the grip and the cheek firmly placed on the stock. A good gun for you to get a better understanding of the mechanical aspect is the HK G3 and its sister PSG1 a world class rifle.

Not trying to be an ass I like your concept and the render is really nice, its just kinda like a grease monkey looking concept car with no room for an engine and being told its really fast.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to TalJKaar [2008-03-10 09:11:41 +0000 UTC]

actually i knew about the alot of that, i just kind of.....was caught up in modeling it, most it it was made as i went if not all of it. but something you might want to consider is this is a fictional gun for a story's universe that is in the future i'm sure they'll have much better advances in firearms. and i also really hate the stock i could have done so much better. thank you very much for a reall well thought out critique, i actually don't get alot of that. it's always "wow that's cool" or "this part could be better" they never say how though. Thanks again

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

omegafactor90 [2008-02-05 23:57:37 +0000 UTC]

Just how long did it take you to get this good with sketch-up? I'm still trying to work with it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to omegafactor90 [2008-02-06 00:01:01 +0000 UTC]

i've actually had it and worked with it for a couple years now, i also had an architectural class where we worked with it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wallflower-chan [2007-11-28 00:19:46 +0000 UTC]

oh, stellar lookin' weapon. very very nice design

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to wallflower-chan [2007-11-28 01:05:50 +0000 UTC]

thanks, and who uses the word "stellar" anymore, jeez you kids trying to bring back things

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wallflower-chan In reply to DrFrag [2007-11-28 01:18:10 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sanoon [2007-11-27 11:58:32 +0000 UTC]

I thought the Echo was an IG rifle? If it isn't, then I can't use if in Sniper cause the soldiers there are IG, not FoE.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to Sanoon [2007-11-27 20:09:53 +0000 UTC]

it's both, i've told you that several times

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sanoon In reply to DrFrag [2007-11-28 12:09:27 +0000 UTC]

I don't remember you saying so at all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to Sanoon [2007-11-28 21:54:03 +0000 UTC]

well i did, and it is

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Half-dude [2007-11-27 08:54:38 +0000 UTC]

Man this looks like it could be a real rifle. I love the light weight look of it, very appealing. Man you're a master of this, guy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to Half-dude [2007-11-27 10:54:18 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much, that's a really nice complement

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Invader-Sideos [2007-11-27 01:57:49 +0000 UTC]

Awesome weapons... damn, I bet one could do some damage with that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to Invader-Sideos [2007-11-27 02:19:59 +0000 UTC]

that's what they're ment to do

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Irken-Maniac [2007-11-27 01:01:08 +0000 UTC]

I wanna play with it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to Irken-Maniac [2007-11-27 01:06:29 +0000 UTC]

gun arn't toys, i thought we were over this, *shakes finger at you*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Irken-Maniac In reply to DrFrag [2007-11-27 01:12:34 +0000 UTC]

But christmas is right around the corner... I wont kill anyone... but that doesnt mean I wont shoot at them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to Irken-Maniac [2007-11-27 01:37:26 +0000 UTC]

:/ no guns, this is for military only

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NCPuddin [2007-11-27 00:57:42 +0000 UTC]

this a concept rifle, or do u have actually schematics for it? Ive been trying to do similar works, but can never find good schematics and pictures to create the models

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to NCPuddin [2007-11-27 01:05:24 +0000 UTC]

well i do have an exact way of how it works, i did need to have a little understanding of it to make is seem at least somewhat realistic, but since it's for a fictional universe it's mostly meant to look good

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NCPuddin In reply to DrFrag [2007-11-27 02:15:20 +0000 UTC]

ok, looked a lot like a barret crossed with a shitek

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrFrag In reply to NCPuddin [2007-11-27 02:19:34 +0000 UTC]

i don't really base any of my weapons off existing ones, but i do look at lots of pictures for refrence

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NCPuddin In reply to DrFrag [2007-11-27 04:07:50 +0000 UTC]

ok, well you stuff is cool anyways.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0