Comments: 24
rosepetal179 [2011-04-20 10:23:47 +0000 UTC]
well, i think i know why u went over the word limit. did u take out unnecessary words? i'm asking that cause it would make the story much shorter and it would be within or less than the limit. maybe u should try taking out unnecessary words or phrase that seem redunant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rosepetal179 In reply to DuchessaIbby [2011-04-21 09:51:46 +0000 UTC]
no problem. i edit for the school newspaper so i decided to give u the advice. why did ur englsh teacher put a limit on the words?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DuchessaIbby In reply to rosepetal179 [2011-04-21 15:24:21 +0000 UTC]
To get us ready for our GCSEs I think. She said: "You need to get used to writing with a word limit so we will start now."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DuchessaIbby In reply to rosepetal179 [2011-04-21 20:38:49 +0000 UTC]
Exams we have to do during the next two years. I think it stands for General Certificate of S___ Education. I can't remember what S stands for :L
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rainy-J-T [2011-03-01 03:47:36 +0000 UTC]
Alright, critique time! (Warning: Super (EXTREMELY) long comment incoming)
Let's start with the title. I love it. It is daunting and intriguing, and every time that I saw it in my inbox I wanted to click on it, but just didn't have the time (as life gets in the way) and now, I am so glad that I did. However, I do feel that the ellipses (the "...") makes it underwhelming. Ellipses should never be used outside of dialog or quotes. If it is just left as "When The Barricade Fell" It makes the title more concrete and powerful rather than trailing off, if that makes sense.
Now, to the introduction. The first bit of dialog does not seem like dialog at all to me. It does not seem like something that someone would actually say out loud. It is very wordy, especially for a traumatized person reliving that trauma. I feel that it would be much more effective in a description, rather than in dialog. You can say, "I relived that night last night. The night the barricade fell." And end the dialog there. Then, when you are talking about how the moment has (you said would, but that implies that it will haunt her from the point it was said, on. What you mean is that it has haunted her since the day it occurred, so has would be a better word there) haunted her forever, you can use that lovely metaphor about her brain being crumpled like newspaper in the description, to make the event more daunting than just saying "it haunted her forever." It makes it more concrete and more of the trauma shows through.
I also feel that the next sentence could be punctuated differently. Try switching it to "The out-of-work actress looked vulnerable. The moment that destroyed her life would haunt her forever; every time she looked in the mirror, every time she tried to sing." You see, you say that it haunted her, and then you say how it haunted her, so those parts are connected by a semi colon. The first part about her looking vulnerable is different, and not connected to her being haunted by the event, so that section would end there with a period. Do you see how this changes the meaning and effect of that section? And then you can start a new sentence and remove the "but". This makes the next sentence more powerful as well. I would also suggest changing the semi colon in the last sentence of that paragraph to a period, to make the last sentence have a bigger punch to it.
Next, the dialog of the therapist is good, no problems there. However the first time I read that paragraph I was confused as to who was speaking. So, make it more clear that the therapist is the person speaking there. You don't even need to say that Emily was afraid, as that is just reiterating what you said before about the memories haunting her, and it becomes redundant. You can just say that their eyes met and she began her tale.
The first paragraph of her tale is perfect. Don't change a thing. I love how nostalgic it is, it really feels like a memory. And I love that you subtly stressed the importance of the song that you mention later in her performance.
Now, the second sentence in the next paragraph can also be made stronger with some changes in punctuation. Try this, "At first it was given to another performer, one with more experience. I became the understudy." This really makes the importance of her originally being the understudy that much stronger. It puts up a subtle flag of "oh, this is important."
I love your description of her opening the letter. You prolong the experience of her pulling it out of the envelope, bringing in more than just the sense of sight. You bring in smell as well, which is great. That more in depth description makes the letter seem that much more important, which it is. So, great job with that! And I love the line about how the script was like lines given to her in a play. GREAT metaphor, especially with the subject. Wonderful!
Now to the ever so important letter! I think that the letter is great, my only issue with the whole letter is that the hyphen between "know" and "he" should be a comma. Other than that, the letter is great.
Next few paragraphs are wonderful, they seem very real if that makes any sense.
In the sentence "I almost gave into the demands" "into" should be "in to".
Now, in the paragraph where she starts to feel drowsy, it is great. However when you break into the next paragraph after the colon, I feel that it makes it choppy. Try moving "I'll sleep in your embrace at last" up and removing the colon. This makes it flow better.
Also, you break paragraphs again when someone shouts "it's the barricade!" I would suggest removing "my lungs desperate for air" entirely and then starting a new paragraph with "I remember someone shouting"
And when you say "the barricade didn't actually fall, it was a figure of speech" that makes the reader think, "wait, the barricade fell, but it didn't?" so try saying "the barricade doesn't actually fall" since you are speaking of a figure of speech, it would remain present tense. That removes confusion about whether the barricade actually fell or not.
I love the line "my flaming prison." Love, love, love. It is very concrete and sparks a great image in my head. Great!!
Now, when you first said that the narrator wears a mask, I immediately thought "wow, Phantom of the Opera, way to be original." but then you went and said that she wore it BECAUSE of the Phantom of the Opera and that made it incredibly original and wonderful. I love that you did that, it is perfect.
This sentence is wonky. "I can talk, just, but the singing that was my life, is now impossible." Do you see why this is weird? You say "I can talk, just" which is kind of confusing. Try saying "barely" or another synonym in place of "just" to make the meaning more clear. And then you say "but the singing that was my life, is now impossible." I think that you were trying to show that the narrator paused there with the comma, but that is not grammatically correct. Remove the comma and it is better. It doesn't take away the sense of pause, but rather makes the reader put their own voice into that sentence. If they would pause there, they will. If they wouldn't, they won't. Does that make sense?
And again, ellipses should only be in dialog or quotes, so end the "I just want to forget" with a period. It will give a sense of finality to her story.
My only, and literally only, problem with the last paragraph is that you say "27th January" didn't the event occur in June? Just check that, or make your intention more clear as I may be misunderstanding.
I love that you switched into first person for her tale, it is lovely and very well done. You have great instinct as a writer and I am super excited to see more from you.
Remember that everything that I have said here is just suggestion, and you do not have to take any of it if you do not want to. And if you have any questions, feel free to ask. I would be more than happy to help.
I'm sorry that this was so long, but I hope that you have found it useful! This was a pleasure to read, and it was very well done. Thank you so much for sharing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
DuchessaIbby In reply to Rainy-J-T [2011-04-22 19:32:47 +0000 UTC]
You write excellent critiques - this was very informative. I was wondering, would you mind having a look at my new story: Beautiful? If you don't have time then that's fine, I mean, I know what it's like to have lots to do! I just think it reads a bit oddly, abd I can't work out what is wrong with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rainy-J-T In reply to DuchessaIbby [2011-05-02 21:28:08 +0000 UTC]
Of course! Sorry this took so long to reply to, I am usually on my other account
I will definitely take a look at that and will get back to you as soon as possible! (most likely on that other account)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DuchessaIbby In reply to Rainy-J-T [2011-05-04 20:18:21 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot(:
I felt a bit bad asking for another critique, but I learnt a lot from the last one (how much of that shows in this one I don't know).
Thanks again(:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rainy-J-T In reply to DuchessaIbby [2011-06-02 03:23:37 +0000 UTC]
Again, so sorry I haven't gotten to it yet!!!! I will do it soon!! Promise!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DuchessaIbby In reply to Rainy-J-T [2011-03-01 07:00:22 +0000 UTC]
Thankyou! Yes, I did find it very useful, and I'll have a look tonight to try and refine it. Oh, and with regards to they June/January thing, that was a misprint that I hadn't noticed, so thanks for pointing that out. Thankyou again for the time you've taken to critique it!(:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rainy-J-T In reply to DuchessaIbby [2011-03-02 01:28:26 +0000 UTC]
You are very welcome! Haha, when I posted it I was like "daaaang... that was long." xD So, I hope you didn't find the length overwhelming. I thoroughly enjoyed reading =]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kaboomduck [2011-02-21 15:28:55 +0000 UTC]
Aah...we all hate word limits
(i remember exceeding the limit by two full pages )
The first-person view of everything is well done and interesting; in short, it kept me reading, which is very rare. Your writing is smooth and easy to follow, and well, there were no cliches, or at least none that felt like one. It's the introduction of the note though, that the story becomes a bit uneven -- it felt rushed. Don't get it wrong, it's not too predictable or dissapointing (it was still fun to read), but then more time and build-up about the note's arrival would be much more effective. Everything else is fine, and with a lot more writing you'd be just great.
And one very notable thing; I loved the first line, cause that was what caught my attention and got me reading. It captures interest straight away and promises good stuff. That's a very important way of making things interesting for people to read your works. Keep it up!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DuchessaIbby In reply to kaboomduck [2011-02-21 18:07:12 +0000 UTC]
So, I rewrote some of it-could you take a look?(:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kaboomduck In reply to DuchessaIbby [2011-02-22 08:03:59 +0000 UTC]
Whew, that was fast
Now the descriptions and flow of plot is much better and clearer, so yeah, good job! I liked the line 'I still remember what that distinctive handwriting said, as though it were lines given to me in a script:' and I don't know why, it's just smooth. (I'm not one for complicated writing).
Oh, and one thing -- it's better to use double-dashes (or hyphens) rather than just one in lines such as "...understand-the meaning..."
Or you could put a space in between the words, cause usually, one hyphen is used in another context, like 'red-colored' or 'bird-like'
Other than that, it's good
👍: 0 ⏩: 1