Comments: 61
miscbeep [2011-11-06 22:37:55 +0000 UTC]
Завиждам на всеки, който рисува добре !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Evulart [2011-01-29 21:35:49 +0000 UTC]
qkooo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
all1na [2010-06-24 08:21:59 +0000 UTC]
amazing! o.O
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shan3990 [2010-05-27 15:29:23 +0000 UTC]
this is so cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ebisa [2010-05-23 23:59:37 +0000 UTC]
wow... страхотно е oO
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dj-Music92 [2010-03-05 16:50:38 +0000 UTC]
prosto neveroqtno!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
angeDenfer [2008-09-25 18:34:06 +0000 UTC]
god! he's gorgeous! and his eyes are amazing!
i like your style. very nice. fav.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrjimmyboy [2008-03-30 08:01:30 +0000 UTC]
I did the same Digi Paint but I have to say yours is amazing! Great work!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zHowie [2008-01-06 13:35:21 +0000 UTC]
:'(Thats awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
florit In reply to ducklin-th [2007-12-24 20:28:46 +0000 UTC]
Е то как ваобще би било възможно на някое човешко същество да не му хареса?Няма нужда от думи..перфектно е казах ти!Пък и не вярвам да не го знаеш...;Р Успех ти пожелавам..Весела Коледа и Нова Година и всичко най-най!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mynti [2007-12-13 23:40:59 +0000 UTC]
Hello I got your note and here I am.
I think there are parts of this that are really working well, and other areas where you can improve.
Textures.
The textures here are really what draws you in. The detail on the skin of the cheek to the right, the stubbly little hairs, and the creases and wrinkles were all done with care and consideration for the textures.
Finishing.
The face is really well finished. Your style is gestural and raw, allowing the brush strokes to speak for themselves. However, there are a few places where you could stand to refine the areas and make the whole painting seem more polished and complete. The major ones are the eyes, which lack depth or roundness, they also lack detail similar to the care you took with the skin. The viewer is naturally drawn to eyes as a focus, so it would do this painting well to bring up the detail on them.
The ear to the right towards the light also looks unfinished, as does the neck. Just simply blending and taking more time on those two areas won't lose your focus which is the face; but instead take the neck and ear out of focus and let the viewer concentrate on the interesting parts of his expression. I also think the chin triangle could be softened slightly to allow the skin to look more fleshy and not stony. I wouldn't detail the neck as much as the face, let that lay into the composition as a connecting, grounding element, but I think as it is now, I spend more time looking at the unfinished neck than I should.
Background.
The background also gives me problems, since it looks like it took a mere seconds to do... Take some time, block in some basic, soft shapes and give him a place to breathe in the composition. Boxing him in like that really contains the composition and doesn't let the eye travel much.
Overall.
Nicely done study - it reads as a study now, but you can really polish this piece and make it more than that if you want.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ducklin-th In reply to mynti [2007-12-21 22:27:30 +0000 UTC]
ok, I work over it and... you can see it now
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
memod [2007-12-13 23:37:26 +0000 UTC]
Heya!
the actual critique project is not exisiting anymore, but sure, I don't mind giving you a critique.
The first thing that caught me as off are the eyes. While the rest of the piece is really strongly shaded and quite well defined, the eyes do look very flat, thus standing out in an unpleasant way. they also seem a slight bit off axis, as is the chin, which does not seem to be in the very centre of his face. it also looks too defined, you should really smoothen it out . otherwise I don't mind the roughish, strongly shaded look, but the chin is a bit too much
you might want to tighten up a few other spots as well, as the neck and the ears, which do not exactly match the level of detail which is present in the rest of the piece and rather distract the viewer. I realize that you were concentrating on the face, but more attention on those areas wouldn't hurt
I also see that above the brows you have some nice shading, but then you go into the forehad and suddenly the colour and value changes and it looks rather flat. why not smoothen out the transition between shaded area and flat forehad a bit more? otherwise you get some odd edges in the picture, like from a bad masking
overall though, I really like your piece. it has good colours and values, looks strong and quite realistic too. however, you could certainly push it further with some more time and polish
Daniel
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DJBoraP [2007-12-13 14:24:28 +0000 UTC]
Наистина страхотна работа!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
denizatasoy [2007-12-12 08:59:05 +0000 UTC]
4udesna rabota! prodaljavai v sa6tiq duh! fave+
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ducklin-th In reply to denizatasoy [2007-12-12 11:23:12 +0000 UTC]
Ще се постарая още по-добре да става.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>