Comments: 43
H-A-designs [2010-09-15 20:05:16 +0000 UTC]
very nice design. I like the first one as the dark background of the logo looks more profesional to me. If the logo on the second ones banner, had a lighter or smaller drop shadow i think it would look better. Just my personl opinion =]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wolchara [2008-03-06 10:11:47 +0000 UTC]
NICE colors!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KiTTy-RaWr In reply to duhcoolies [2008-03-06 20:24:41 +0000 UTC]
Understandably, and it looks better. But I see why you can't change it much more, it does overpower the information.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kareem-cs [2008-03-05 16:51:20 +0000 UTC]
nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arcticTransfuse [2008-03-05 16:38:25 +0000 UTC]
OMG I CAN JPG LolOLZOLOLZZZZZZZ!!!!!!1!1!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arcticTransfuse In reply to duhcoolies [2008-03-06 16:37:14 +0000 UTC]
: D
Just complaining about the crappy-quality JPEG you saved this as (and at the header image [people])
Quite a nice design otherwise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
duhcoolies In reply to Lilyas [2010-06-03 08:29:39 +0000 UTC]
Hehe thanks lol
The design may have been approved but the client also massacred my original creation in the final version. I had the left the company by that time and another designer took over and did the final. I wasn't pleased :[
But yeah, I've updated the deviation header and credited the source :]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arcticTransfuse In reply to duhcoolies [2008-03-06 20:55:40 +0000 UTC]
Ah right it was an unpaid stock, that makes sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lateralsnowflake [2008-03-05 15:50:42 +0000 UTC]
Boy, it'd be a shame if they don't like this, because it's really, really awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1