HOME | DD

Durbed β€” Parasaurolophus walkeri by-nc-nd

Published: 2012-03-31 12:18:53 +0000 UTC; Views: 3754; Favourites: 54; Downloads: 248
Redirect to original
Description I just realized the other day that my gallery is a bit overcrowded by theropods. ThatΒ΄s not right, and since I believe in archosaur equality I started drawing something different. Expect more non theropod thingies pretty soon.

So, well, hereΒ΄s everyones favourite lambeosaurine (or at least, mine).
Related content
Comments: 22

FireSinMaster [2012-04-06 17:56:41 +0000 UTC]

This used to be my favorite dinosaur when i was little! awesome work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Durbed In reply to FireSinMaster [2012-04-07 13:10:49 +0000 UTC]

thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

E-Smaniotto [2012-04-01 09:33:57 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, revenge of the fat dinosaurs! Good work by the way

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Durbed In reply to E-Smaniotto [2012-04-02 18:09:05 +0000 UTC]

Cheers...but its not fat, just big-boned!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tomozaurus [2012-04-01 00:16:47 +0000 UTC]

Really like this one, dude.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Durbed In reply to Tomozaurus [2012-04-02 18:08:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks...!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

yoult [2012-03-31 19:07:52 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you're not an advocate of archosaurian-apartheid and making my most favourite Ornithischia makes it even better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Durbed In reply to yoult [2012-03-31 21:03:56 +0000 UTC]

And IΒ΄m glad you liked it sir!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PeteriDish [2012-03-31 18:41:45 +0000 UTC]

Γ–h yeah! parasaurolophus needs some love too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Durbed In reply to PeteriDish [2012-03-31 21:03:26 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeteriDish In reply to Durbed [2012-03-31 21:07:22 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Weird-Duck [2012-03-31 14:13:35 +0000 UTC]

Looks good! I like the markings and scale detail.

Seems this fellow has a little junk in the trunk, though... At least, the upper leg looks very plump to me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Durbed In reply to Weird-Duck [2012-03-31 21:03:13 +0000 UTC]

Oh, thank you. The upper leg may look a bit too beefy because its "embebbed" in the body and covered by thick muscle and skin following the example of birds and big tetrapods like elephants. Those animals had generally huge caudofemoral muscles that help them to overrun their slowest predators (or kick them to oblivion).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Eriorguez [2012-03-31 14:00:08 +0000 UTC]

In case of theropod overcrowding and need of archosaurian equality, the answer is clear: Go Rauisuchians!

Gotta love how this Para looks able to beat up any Albertosaur foolish enough to attack it head on. Hadrosaur means "robust lizard", after all...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Durbed In reply to Eriorguez [2012-03-31 20:55:46 +0000 UTC]

ThatΒ΄s funny, I have a raisuchian WIP somewhere...- but theyΒ΄re -conceptually- sort of quadrupedal theropods anyway. Hervibore ornitischians need more love.

And yes, duckbills might is vastly overrated. Need more depictions of those stomping theropods, in fact, you gave me an idea for a future drawing...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Eriorguez In reply to Durbed [2012-04-01 22:59:46 +0000 UTC]

I have to disagree; it is theropods the ones that look like bipedal rauisuchians.

But yeah, ornitischians are awesome as well. Robust Hadrosaurs and boar-like ceratopsians are far better that Tyrannosaurus snacks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheArchosaurQueen In reply to Eriorguez [2012-03-31 19:55:12 +0000 UTC]

. Agreed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheArchosaurQueen [2012-03-31 12:25:23 +0000 UTC]

! I support archosaur equality as well, theropods are awesome, but their not the only kinds of dinosaurs.

Also, why no colorful webbing between the crest and neck? I think it’s a likely organic decoration.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Durbed In reply to TheArchosaurQueen [2012-03-31 12:43:37 +0000 UTC]

The famous crest skin flap is probably a bit unlikely [link] though I used to like this kind of restorations. At first glance it may seem reasonable that such elongated structure supported something else (thatΒ΄s the case of Nyctosaurus as well), but such webbing would probably limitate the head rotation too much. Ah, dunno. I prefer to play safe.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheArchosaurQueen In reply to Durbed [2012-03-31 13:02:52 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm, alright fare enough, and I see your point. But the link doesn't work :/.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Durbed In reply to TheArchosaurQueen [2012-03-31 13:06:48 +0000 UTC]

Just remove the "," after ...html, that should work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheArchosaurQueen In reply to Durbed [2012-03-31 13:30:57 +0000 UTC]

I see.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0