Comments: 20
M4dW0rk [2011-07-13 14:17:46 +0000 UTC]
Splendido lavoro, complimenti
π: 0 β©: 1
Tomozaurus [2011-06-27 07:44:05 +0000 UTC]
If only more followed Martyniuk's work, we'd have a lot less inaccurate maniraptors littered about the place.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheMorlock [2011-06-08 18:08:26 +0000 UTC]
Cool!
π: 0 β©: 1
LittleFoxStudio [2011-06-08 17:22:21 +0000 UTC]
I think people are going a little over board with feathered dinos. I believe in evolution and all, but every time I see a new drawing of one, it looks more like a bird and less like a dino.
π: 0 β©: 2
Skull-Island-Master In reply to LittleFoxStudio [2011-06-08 19:23:18 +0000 UTC]
There are still many scaly dinosaurs though. currently only coelurosaurs are proven to were fully covered in feathers.
π: 0 β©: 0
LittleFoxStudio In reply to E-Smaniotto [2011-06-08 22:40:35 +0000 UTC]
Could be that I just prefer the scalier versions. Or maybe just less prominent feather. Dinos had several million years to turn into birds.
π: 0 β©: 1
LittleFoxStudio In reply to E-Smaniotto [2011-06-09 14:40:11 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I know. When I think of say.... Velociraptor, my mind instantly goes to the ones in Disney's Dinosaur. Accurate skeleton and body shape, but still scaly.
π: 0 β©: 1
Tomozaurus In reply to LittleFoxStudio [2011-06-27 07:47:09 +0000 UTC]
Disney's Velociraptor is pretty inaccurate in skeleton and shape as well. The skull is wrong, the forelimbs are very wrong and the body isn't quite properly proportioned.
Plus is certainly had feathers, fireguards of who likes it or not.
π: 0 β©: 1
BrooksLeibee [2011-06-07 18:40:19 +0000 UTC]
Makes me miss the naked version!
XD
But I still HAVE to love the feathered even more from their beautiful feathers, and their more hostile look.
π: 0 β©: 0