HOME | DD

eccentrics β€” Roadtrip

Published: 2008-02-25 02:23:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 1691; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 45
Redirect to original
Description
Doodled + Scanned.
Should I color this?
Comments?
Related content
Comments: 28

rhianaaa [2008-08-05 06:08:00 +0000 UTC]

this is awesome. i love doodling it at least gets me off focus of everything else. i don't think you should colour it, it wouldn't be very doodly after it. thats how i look at the art of doodling anyway

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

underspoken [2008-05-01 15:42:19 +0000 UTC]

pretty cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

caroislove [2008-03-28 00:34:17 +0000 UTC]

i dont think she should color it =[
it'd take away from it.
i love it tho theresa <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

behindherheart [2008-02-26 20:49:00 +0000 UTC]

Yes! Color it
sooo pretty.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

digitaldanielle [2008-02-25 22:26:35 +0000 UTC]

wow sooo cute, and inspiring, i think you should color it, it would look so rad

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

colorlessday [2008-02-25 20:41:02 +0000 UTC]

I agree with ~Synthesise, because there is nothing to loose.

Just out of curiosity, what did you use to draw this?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

beauxlent In reply to colorlessday [2008-12-25 16:15:24 +0000 UTC]

nothing speciall, just a ballpoint pen

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

colorlessday In reply to beauxlent [2009-01-04 09:59:05 +0000 UTC]

Late response? LOL.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

seaofsmiles [2008-02-25 05:36:31 +0000 UTC]


this is so cute, theresa!
i just totally adore it.
anyways, i think it looks great black and white,
but like astrea said above, coloring wouldn't hurt it either.

you are so talented.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jetblackmirror [2008-02-25 03:57:40 +0000 UTC]

-agrees with comment above-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Synthesise [2008-02-25 03:55:40 +0000 UTC]

That looks so cool. ;D I think it looks great b&w, but there's nothing to lose by coloring it - it'd look awesome with some bright/vibrant colors.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

instructively In reply to Synthesise [2008-02-25 04:19:50 +0000 UTC]

If she colors it, she'll use it as a brush, and repeatedly use it over and over again with her layouts.
Please have some consideration for her improvement.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthesise In reply to instructively [2008-02-25 05:17:29 +0000 UTC]

Coloring has nothing to do with using it as a brush.
Please use some common sense when replying to my comments.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

instructively In reply to Synthesise [2008-03-04 00:33:32 +0000 UTC]

If you're commenting on her work, please take notice of it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

neonrayne In reply to instructively [2008-05-02 22:21:08 +0000 UTC]

You're a very annoying person. xD
Why would she use it over and over again as her brush?

Do you have any clue whatsoever what you are talking about?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

instructively In reply to neonrayne [2008-05-03 05:10:21 +0000 UTC]

TouchΓ© yet again!
Have you asked yourself the opposing question?

In fact I'm afraid I do not, the amount of contradictoriness is very overwhelming.
I apologize for my inconvenience.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Synthesise In reply to instructively [2008-03-06 02:11:43 +0000 UTC]

If you're speaking, please shut up.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

instructively In reply to Synthesise [2008-03-12 21:55:41 +0000 UTC]

Please explain to me how this relates to common sense.
For I am not speaking, I am typing.
It is only common (and sensible) to know that typing is not speaking.
Speaking:
–noun
1. the act, utterance, or discourse of a person who speaks.
2. speakings, literary works composed for recitation, as ancient bardic poetry; oralliterature.
–adjective
3. that speaks.
4. used in, suited to, or involving speaking or talking: the speaking voice.
5. of or pertaining to declamation.
6. giving information as if by speech: a speaking proof of a thing.
7. highly expressive: speaking eyes.
8. lifelike: a speaking likeness.

7 and 8 are rather complimentary, do you not think?

Voice:
1. the sound or sounds uttered through the mouth of living creatures, esp. of human beings in speaking, shouting, singing, etc.
2. the faculty or power of uttering sounds through the mouth by the controlled expulsion of air; speech: to lose one's voice.
3. a range of such sounds distinctive to one person, or to a type of person or animal: Her voice is commanding.
4. the condition or effectiveness of the voice for speaking or singing: to be in poor voice.
5. a sound likened to or resembling vocal utterance: the voice of the wind.
6. something likened to speech as conveying impressions to the mind: the voice of nature.
7. expression in spoken or written words, or by other means: to give voice to one's disapproval by a letter.

However definition #7 is not commonly used, (more in fact never used), which is considerably considered "You're using the wrong word." If Dictionary.com is using the word voice on terms of definition 7 or 6, it is more sensible to use the word opinion/opinionated.

n.

1.
1. The sound produced by the vocal organs of a vertebrate, especially a human.
2. The ability to produce such sounds.

I apologize for replying to your common sense so late.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthesise In reply to instructively [2008-03-12 23:25:27 +0000 UTC]

Too bad you didn't read all the definitions.

Speaking includes
# to converse
# to make a statement in written or printed words
# to communicate, signify, or disclose by any means; convey significance.
# to declare in writing or printing, or by any means of communication.
# to make known, indicate, or reveal.

Sort your shit out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

compliable In reply to Synthesise [2014-01-19 23:15:30 +0000 UTC]

I can't believe this actually happened.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthesise In reply to compliable [2014-01-19 23:34:49 +0000 UTC]

Lmaooooooooo oh wow.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

instructively In reply to Synthesise [2008-03-17 05:39:41 +0000 UTC]

Excuse me, but really:

"However definition #7 is not commonly used, (more in fact never used), which is considerably considered "You're using the wrong word." If Dictionary.com is using the word voice on terms of definition 7 or 6, it is more sensible to use the word opinion/opinionated."

The word typing is greatly preferred.
As in relating to sense!

Go wear a bra.
Totally irrelevant but hey!!!!!
i like tew contradict myself uhm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthesise In reply to instructively [2008-03-17 05:50:17 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

scionlights In reply to Synthesise [2008-03-12 21:46:19 +0000 UTC]

If you can do the math, you don't need to speak while typing.
Therefor it should be:
"If you're [typing], then please [stop]."

I hope this helped you in your future, since common sense is needed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Synthesise In reply to scionlights [2008-03-12 23:27:43 +0000 UTC]

Whilst speaking and typing in this event are somewhat interrelated; the typing is irrelevant. No one gives two shits about the actual act of writing with the keyboard. We're concerned with the final typed product.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

scionlights In reply to scionlights [2008-03-12 21:47:31 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, it would actually be:
"If you're [typing], [than] please [stop]."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthesise In reply to scionlights [2008-03-12 23:30:45 +0000 UTC]

No, then is correct.

The distinction between 'then' and 'than' is so basic. You'd think if you were trying to correct me you should be able to get it right.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

riotgun [2008-02-25 02:30:16 +0000 UTC]

No need for color?
idk. i love it.
[=

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0