HOME | DD
EN70 —
Abortion
Published: 2005-11-12 19:43:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 114742; Favourites: 1905; Downloads: 1047
Redirect to original
Description
Social Poster about abortion issueMy statement about abortion:
I dont like that abortion became "usual" thing.
I accept it in some situations. It is even neccessery sometimes.
Choice is for mothers.
However treating it as a "eraser" will increase relativism and egoism.
Futher more, relativism will bring that there will be more bad things treat as a good
**I'm graphic freelancer and looking for a job****
Related content
Comments: 3384
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Don't forget that abortion is also anti white, because the elitists that push for abortion want white people to have more abortions so the caucasian/aryan race will dwindle in their numbers resulting in hordes of foreigners outbreeding them in their own countries. Leftists and anyone who advocate for abortion often are very resentful towards the white race especially those who are pro diversity, only for white countries. They don't care that middle eastern and African nations mostly are populated by black Africans and arabs. Including countries with incredibly high population rates such as China, India, and Japan. But countries like America, Canada, Britain, Sweden and other white European countries must have people from other races in them.
Abortionists who use the overpopulation argument often want people to believe that countries in the west need to have more abortions while migrants are usually ignored there, meanwhile the countries I listed above that have criminally high population rates, the left never seems to bat an eye at that. It's all about white countries that are filled with "Racist" white people who love their nations.
So in conclusion abortion is also white genocide and anti western.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Efforts to make abortion illegal will increase suffering and misery; practically no woman contemplating the procedure wants to be in that position in the first place.
If you really want to reduce elective (non-medically-necessary) abortion, make contraceptives inexpensive and more readily available. The horrible irony is that so many who want to eliminate abortion also seek to eliminate access to any contraceptives, including condoms and diaphragms. One of the primary sources of this idiocy is the effort (mainly by the Abrahamic desert monotheisms: Judaism, Christianity and Islam) to eliminate eros and eroticism from the human condition; absent that, our society and its attitude toward all aspects of sexuality would be infinitely healthier.
👍: 4 ⏩: 0
Young girl named Lia Mills speech for stop abortion, please watch this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzUb6i…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
As long as both Parents want to End the kid what's the problem?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The child is still a human being.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A human that can't have opinions.
Everything that comes from someone under Eight years must be Ignored
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Are you actually arguing that its permissible to kill any human being under the age of eight?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The brain isn't fully devolved until that age and we can already kill 24 week year old humans so yeah.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're like a parody of a pro-choicer. And a sick fuck besides.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And your'e a Protestant Bitch.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm a Catholic. Also that doesn't refute any of my points.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Overpopulation and weak mothers Refute your points.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In the Bible, life doesn't begin until the first breath outside the womb. Also, before 24 weeks, the brain doesn't process pain signals, so the fetus cannot suffer the way an already-born baby subjected to neglect, malnourishment, or disease would. And if the abortion takes place in the third trimester, it's almost exclusively because of tragic, heartbreaking conditions where the baby won't survive anyway, and trying to carry the pregnancy to term will permanently harm or kill the mother.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
In the Bible, life doesn't begin until the first breath outside the womb.
Citation please.
Also, before 24 weeks, the brain doesn't process pain signals, so the fetus cannot suffer the way an already-born baby subjected to neglect, malnourishment, or disease would.
But it's still a human being.
And if the abortion takes place in the third trimester, it's almost exclusively because of tragic, heartbreaking conditions where the baby won't survive anyway, and trying to carry the pregnancy to term will permanently harm or kill the mother.
Produce the stats for that or spare me your sophistry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"But it's still a human being."
So is the mother.
I'd written, "Also, before 24 weeks, the brain doesn't process pain signals, so the fetus cannot suffer the way an already-born baby subjected to neglect, malnourishment, or disease would." It's my experience that the anti-choicers who oppose abortion AND contraception (which would make the majority of abortions unnecessary) also oppose food stamps, WIC, housing assistance, and other programs that would help impoverished new mothers feed, clothe and properly care for their infants; if they get their way, babies WOULD suffer the privations I describe, even to the point of death.
George Carlin had it right: "If you're pre-born, you're fine. If you're pre-school, you're f*cked."
If a fetus isn't aborted by the third trimester, the mother wants the baby. It's the anti-choicer/forced-birth advocates who practice sophistry when they say, "Any abortion is for the mother's convenience and all babies are viable."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1) I couldn't give less of a fuck about your "experience" if I tried. The fact you can't comprehend any complexity or nuance in political thought has nothing to do with me.
2) Show me the statistics that support your claim or stop asserting it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1. I stand by my observations. If you REALLY want to eliminate first-trimester abortions, you have to support keeping contraceptives legal and easily available.
2. I strongly doubt that any statistics would persuade you or any other anti-choicer. It's more a matter of logic and common sense, anyway, to presume that if a woman carries her fetus to the third trimester, she wants it; after all, the best time to perform the operation would be early in the first trimester, when the embryo is still tiny. Though I did find this tidbit on Slate:Abortions late in pregnancy are rare—in 2015, just 1.3 percent of abortions occurred at or after 21 weeks’ gestation, the same as it was in 1992. And in 1992, one study found that only about 2 percent of that 1 percent of abortions were performed at more than 26 weeks’ gestation. But pregnant women are not as capricious, nor doctors as slapdash, as anti-abortion advocates make them out to be. There are plenty of legitimate reasons that a woman might want or need an abortion later in her pregnancy. As doctor and public health researcher Daniel Grossman explained in a Twitter thread on Thursday, changes in the health of the fetus or pregnant woman, late-in-pregnancy test results revealing fetal abnormalities or nonviability, and legal restrictions—”Everything from medically unnecessary waiting periods and ultrasound laws to shuttering of clinics and insurance bans,” Grossman writes—can all contribute to a woman’s decision to get an abortion in her second or third trimester. (slate.com/news-and-politics/20… )
Here's another snippet from that article to consider:To understand the circumstances that precede a third-trimester abortion, forget the midlabor abomination Gilbert invented and consider the story of Kate Carson . At 35 weeks’ pregnancy, Carson learned that her fetus had multiple brain malformations that would leave her daughter unable to walk, talk, swallow, or even sleep. Or consider the story of Erika Christensen , who found out while 30 weeks pregnant that her baby would never be able to breathe, meaning the child would choke to death within minutes of his birth. Phoebe Day Danziger has framed her decision to terminate a fetus with critical urethra, kidney, and lung development issues as end-of-life care —a way to compassionately and peacefully prevent the suffering of a son she very much wanted. Tran’s bill—and, to some extent, the law that’s already on the books in Virginia—recognizes that no pregnant woman should be forced to endure childbirth to the detriment of her own health and possibly be forced to deliver a fetus doomed to a short lifetime of suffering, if it’s capable of surviving outside the womb at all.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
"Logic" demands that any information referred to be cited you condescending wretch. "Common sense" means exactly jack shit. Provide the research that shows the given causes for the majority of third trimester abortions or piss off.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The citations in the Slate article, and the research they cited, aren't enough for you? Just as I expected.
That you dismiss the traumatic stories in that (and many other) articles marks you as some mixture of hopeless idiot, heartless ideologue or sadistic theotyrant in the mold of Thomas de Torquemada.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1) You asserted "most" abortions undertaken in the third trimester were done because of some health defect in mother or child. That "article" did not corroborate that assertion. Either show me some evidence of your assertion, or admit you're full of shit.
2) Spare me your moral prate you sniveling wretch.
3) Anyone can tell a "traumatic story." I can weave a few about people not receiving life-saving medical care in Europe because of long waits. Does that mean all publicly subsidized healthcare will kill people? NO. Now either stip being such an impudent fucking child or piss the fuck off.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fevlfvvfnlfdnjdfjnfnjkdfvdnjdfv djkn
*ahem* I prefer having the bab and not killing it.
And the scientific word for that is: I'm pro l I f e
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Overpopulation is literally the exact opposite of what is happening in first-world countries. Overpopulation is only an issue in countries like India, or anywhere in Africa, and I think they have more important issues needed to be addressed before then, like civil unrest, unstable and corrupt government, general shit living conditions, etc.
Just a thought
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Just to let you know. Some someone stole your image.
The thief: LeoDavidJones Her choice
Unless you gave permission or what not. Then ignore.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This pic makes me want to cry ;c
Anyways, Great Job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Woof. That's pretty stark.
I think everyone can agree that it's very well done, regardless of your position on the question it addresses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I can't believe how strong a message this sends, though I'm for equal-choice (the husband or partner having a say in it as well) I love how emotional this deviation depicts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Abortion in a nutshell.
Good point: 12 year olds, Inbreeding and Virus outbreak.
Bad point: High school/college and party girls who don't use birth control.
*Sigh* If I ever have a Girlfriend, both me and her are just better off touching each other until we reached the 20s. That's just me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Oh my f*cking god.
Would you rather follow your dreams or take care of a screaming infant?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
*whispers
.
.
.
.
..... adoption
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
im 18 and have twins
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Agreed, and dat YYH icon though
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
And like any gift, you can take it back.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Life is the greatest gift of all. Something that shouldn't be taken back unless you're an asshole.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I do not support forcing something women don't want on them on the basis of empty morals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And I don't support killing an innocent life for your own selfish needs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Then don't ever swat a mosquito again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A Mosquito can't be compared to a human life.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>