Comments: 103
aeroartist [2009-07-07 01:57:33 +0000 UTC]
awesome capture
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Filsdeloup [2009-01-14 05:47:05 +0000 UTC]
Il aimerais bien voler lui aussi ! ... belle scene !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mgilpin [2009-01-04 03:33:49 +0000 UTC]
wow... when did you start shooting with a hasselblad?...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
equivoque In reply to mgilpin [2009-01-04 16:31:04 +0000 UTC]
well, i bought one last year due to the fact that i won't have any time-zero very soon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mgilpin In reply to equivoque [2009-01-04 21:06:13 +0000 UTC]
(laugh)... well, that works... though, other than the square format, I don't think that two have much in common...
wait... you still have time-zero... wow!...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mgilpin In reply to equivoque [2009-01-04 22:21:01 +0000 UTC]
hey... one quick thought... you can use those time-zero images as the print medium for other work... you take any image from any format... scan it (unless it is digital)... output it as a slide... then project it onto the polaroid film of your choice...
[link]
or, of course, you could just shoot slide/transparency and project that...
here's an example of work done that way...
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
equivoque In reply to mgilpin [2009-01-05 23:01:21 +0000 UTC]
cool idea. thanks. i was thinking today after i read your comments how i thought you should be using film. it just seems to go with the conceptual and intellectual nature of your work. well, my opinion isn't worth much. it was just a thought i had.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mgilpin In reply to equivoque [2009-01-07 20:50:32 +0000 UTC]
do you mean film for photo print?... or film/moving images?...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
equivoque In reply to mgilpin [2009-01-09 03:49:03 +0000 UTC]
no, i mean not digital. shot on film. i haven't been logging into da at all. if i don't answer, that would be why.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mgilpin In reply to equivoque [2009-01-10 08:03:27 +0000 UTC]
no worries... I sometimes go a week or more between stops in here...
you are right, by the way... as my works stands, it is much more suited to film... the meaning almost inheres in that form... and becomes diluted as digital...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
equivoque In reply to donhosho [2008-12-10 23:27:03 +0000 UTC]
thanks for that lovely critique.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
conf9ssion [2008-11-14 02:50:40 +0000 UTC]
i love this picture!!!
so nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
scrivyscriv [2008-10-06 04:21:39 +0000 UTC]
...sorry, I forgot to also mention that you did such a great job making this image. Delicious tones! I saw it in your gallery and very much wanted to buy it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
equivoque In reply to scrivyscriv [2008-10-06 15:40:07 +0000 UTC]
it reduces blue haze enhancing clarity of the picture without affecting color fidelity. in b/w it seems to make a crisp contrast.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
scrivyscriv In reply to equivoque [2008-10-08 12:53:40 +0000 UTC]
I knew of the first, but didn't know it affected contrast in b&w... thanks for the tip!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
danc1ng1nthera1n [2008-08-14 17:21:01 +0000 UTC]
wow! I love the concept.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stefanobroli [2008-08-09 21:20:53 +0000 UTC]
Great job, congratulations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ictenbey [2008-08-07 12:34:01 +0000 UTC]
so nice capture
so nice image;
well done ! …
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kazakchoc [2008-08-02 08:52:45 +0000 UTC]
I like this picture so much! very nice done
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MyLaundryStinks [2008-08-01 02:52:40 +0000 UTC]
Wow. The detail and clarity is amazing. This is a fantastic shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
equivoque In reply to gONZOm [2008-08-01 04:41:08 +0000 UTC]
thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
equivoque In reply to 2jL [2008-08-01 04:41:56 +0000 UTC]
merci
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lorseau [2008-07-31 17:10:38 +0000 UTC]
joli !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>