HOME | DD

equivoque In reply to young-princess [2008-03-16 05:17:22 +0000 UTC]

autumn i think

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

equivoque In reply to luckystars [2007-10-03 06:32:51 +0000 UTC]

die a painful, horrible death

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

luckystars In reply to equivoque [2007-10-03 20:54:05 +0000 UTC]

do you have a ton of it stocked up?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

equivoque In reply to luckystars [2007-10-03 21:44:45 +0000 UTC]

no, two more packs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

luckystars In reply to equivoque [2007-10-04 03:26:19 +0000 UTC]

*cries*
i've never even gotten to use any.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

equivoque In reply to 99thbone [2007-09-15 03:56:39 +0000 UTC]

thanks. i had a special connection with this photo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

equivoque In reply to mrockwood [2007-09-15 03:50:54 +0000 UTC]

honestly, i am surprised on this photo as how many see it as a portrait. i see it as emulsion, orange, green, cyan, silver, grain... i see it as the colors of time-zero with surreal looking children standing in the midst of the color.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Rishnai In reply to equivoque [2007-09-22 06:32:31 +0000 UTC]

I, for one, saw the surreal element first. But I must concur with everyone else, it looks very much like a portrait the longer one looks at it. I've noticed that the valuability of the film and the irrevokability in each shot means that every photo taken with it has that much more meaning. I don't think this would be nearly as overwhelmingly surreal for me without the specific colors of the specific film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

equivoque In reply to Rishnai [2007-09-22 22:39:05 +0000 UTC]

wah!

i am running out of this film just when i know it really, really well...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rishnai In reply to equivoque [2007-09-23 05:48:54 +0000 UTC]

A tragedy indeed. You should have seen the way I spazzed out when I heard they were discontinuing 126. But your time-zero work is a lot more interesting than 99% of what I could even aspire to when I was shooting 126.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mrockwood In reply to equivoque [2007-09-15 12:47:16 +0000 UTC]

Closeness to the subject. You photograph them constantly as mothers do. The closeness of them when the urge to shoot hits explains much. But, none the less, the result is that wonderful side effect which plagues and pleases; work taking on a life of its own. If, after you're gone, a curator collects and writes about your work, it will be from the angle of a mother's loving photographic presence in the lives of her children and all that can imply with a footnote about the surreality of their forms in the color of Time-Zero.
Mark

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

equivoque In reply to mrockwood [2007-09-18 00:19:45 +0000 UTC]

i don't think i'll have a biographer or curator. i don't even think i stand a chance of getting a book of time-zero shots put together and published. i learned from +cweeks how much money a photographer has to put up for her/his own book! anyway, love the comment. i am as close to the medium in this case as to the photographic subject (not as to the actual kids, of course, to whom i am much closer). thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

equivoque In reply to frescendine [2007-09-15 03:58:01 +0000 UTC]

thanks, that's how i felt about it too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

equivoque In reply to Valimar [2007-09-17 02:23:14 +0000 UTC]

i'm incredibly late on this comment! thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

equivoque In reply to lorseau [2007-09-14 03:18:06 +0000 UTC]

thanks. sigh... time-zero.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0