Comments: 30
sevenofeleven [2009-05-14 11:46:44 +0000 UTC]
They wanted smoke detectors but the detectors were too high poly so they got Phil. Phil fell asleep.
Looks great.
I like the floor tiles.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dmaland [2009-02-18 22:33:17 +0000 UTC]
Pretty solid, I'd say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mark1214 In reply to eRe4s3r [2009-02-19 08:25:15 +0000 UTC]
aaah, ok i understand
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SiteLine6 [2009-02-18 14:51:45 +0000 UTC]
I think it looks awesome! the building reminds of some creepy old insane asylum!
sweet job
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ovni-the-UFO [2009-02-18 13:13:56 +0000 UTC]
The fire is great, but the smoke should be alot thicker....look at house and building fires, they're usually very thick very dark smoke.
Usually fires won't get that big in terms of flame-size, but they can indeed get that big, so this must be one of those five-alarm fires. o:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Krodil In reply to eRe4s3r [2009-02-18 08:54:22 +0000 UTC]
yeah, or else u have to attach em separetly, which would be a pain.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Empyrean-DesignWorks [2009-02-18 08:17:39 +0000 UTC]
I'm loving the smoke/fire interaction. I think if the smoke were slightly more opaque it'd look even more real. Maybe some sparks/licks of flame as well? Anyway, great job, man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eRe4s3r In reply to Empyrean-DesignWorks [2009-02-18 09:08:10 +0000 UTC]
Your usefull idea turned to be a mayor pain, i had forgotten what a rendertime killer real smoke and fire is..
Not sure how to do that ;/
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
eRe4s3r In reply to Empyrean-DesignWorks [2009-02-18 17:50:32 +0000 UTC]
,p Wouldn't know what else to do with this, although it certainly does not look bad, its not much of a model to show around more than once, actually planning to donate this to mektek (the model)
I tried a bit with pyrocluster tuning but anything that renders fast doesn't look good, and anything that looks good renders really not very fast.
;(
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ovni-the-UFO In reply to eRe4s3r [2009-02-18 13:15:07 +0000 UTC]
Render it seperately and copy-paste it in photoshop onto the fire? o:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JennyDork [2009-02-18 04:21:27 +0000 UTC]
nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TDBK [2009-02-18 04:20:40 +0000 UTC]
Cool man! Love the damage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
classicblue [2009-02-18 04:12:51 +0000 UTC]
The final product is impressive! very good job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1