HOME | DD

ERIC-ARTS-inc β€” RMS TITANIC II PORT SIDE PROFILE complete

#rmstitanic #ship #vessel #rmstitanicii
Published: 2014-10-24 19:20:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 11682; Favourites: 70; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I highly doubt this will ever come to fruition but I decided to alter the original file of Titanic to create the Blue Star Line's planned revival of the Olympic-Class, with the legendary liner's "daughter" as the company's flagship. If built; Titanic II will be a near perfect replica of her exalted namesake, combining all the opulent luxury and lavish appointments of the original with all of the modern 21st century safety applications which largely came about due to the great tragedy over 100 years ago.
Related content
Comments: 42

BrandonTSW2 [2022-06-27 03:34:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to BrandonTSW2 [2022-06-28 00:44:03 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BrandonTSW2 In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2022-06-28 00:46:03 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DonovyEgg [2022-04-16 17:07:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to DonovyEgg [2022-05-29 14:40:34 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lusitania25 [2015-05-28 10:57:15 +0000 UTC]

Hmm needs more lifeboats I think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

GustavoK98 In reply to lusitania25 [2018-02-17 19:48:58 +0000 UTC]

Nenhum navio hj pode operar com botes a menos e sem uma margem de sobra de 2 botes extras.... alΓ©m das balsas inflΓ‘veisΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to lusitania25 [2015-05-28 15:28:14 +0000 UTC]

Yes I am missing the small speed craft forward of the main lifeboats, but I researched the proposed design plans and those indeed are the accurate number of lifeboats on both port and starboard.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lusitania25 In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2015-05-28 16:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Ya but this is Titanic so i would add a few more to be sureΒ Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to lusitania25 [2015-05-28 17:22:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh thats messed up lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lusitania25 In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2015-05-28 19:44:53 +0000 UTC]

I dont think she would sink but it would make passengers feel better if it had alot of lifeboats!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WOLFBLADE111 [2015-04-15 00:54:23 +0000 UTC]

Awesome.
Keep it up.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to WOLFBLADE111 [2015-04-15 01:34:09 +0000 UTC]

Will do my friend.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CNMathias [2014-11-14 09:48:59 +0000 UTC]

Great work but we better make sure Clive Palmer steps foot aboard this ship or it'll sink like a rock.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to CNMathias [2014-11-14 15:01:16 +0000 UTC]

LMFAO!!! Thats hysterical

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KaneTakerfan701 [2014-10-25 11:16:15 +0000 UTC]

9 years ago I predicted that a new Titanic would come.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to KaneTakerfan701 [2014-10-25 16:37:00 +0000 UTC]

Unfortunately Ive red that the project is halted, for how long is uncertain.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JonnyCade [2014-10-25 05:06:53 +0000 UTC]

Hm......bet it will sink too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to JonnyCade [2014-10-25 06:29:10 +0000 UTC]

I hope not.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JonnyCade In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2014-10-25 06:36:18 +0000 UTC]

Same but it will be really ironic if it does.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to JonnyCade [2014-10-25 16:39:34 +0000 UTC]

True I suppose.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JonnyCade In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2014-10-25 16:41:29 +0000 UTC]

Eh. It depends acctualy. I mean,when the original titanic sank it was very ironic if you know what I mean.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to JonnyCade [2014-10-25 16:50:56 +0000 UTC]

Very much so. She was called "invincible", and "unsinkable" The popular press of the day even stated publicly that God himself could not sink this ship. (Not just a quote from the 1997 film). The attitudes of the people that humanity can via its technological prowess, conquer nature itself; obviously nature didn't take kindly to this arrogance at all. I very much believe that Titanic was an instrument chosen by fate to show mankind that he is not as great as he thinks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JonnyCade In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2014-10-25 17:04:29 +0000 UTC]

I agree. Also because it relates to this book where a ship sinks which is called titan and it was recalled unsinkable as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to JonnyCade [2014-10-25 18:04:18 +0000 UTC]

Ahhh the fabled novel that seem to foretell the events nearly 20 years hence from the book's initial publication. Id LOVE to read it myself. And perhaps draw a profile of an interpretation of what the steamer looked like in the novel. The great Ken Marshall (one of my top 5 favorite artists), painted a piece that I believe became cover art for a republished version of the book.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JonnyCade In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2014-10-25 18:35:22 +0000 UTC]

That's amazing! I do look forward to reading that book as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

enterprisedavid [2014-10-25 05:05:13 +0000 UTC]

I may never have the money to get onboard but I would love to see her in the sea with my own eyes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to enterprisedavid [2014-10-25 06:29:24 +0000 UTC]

As would I.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Oceanlinerorca [2014-10-25 01:58:50 +0000 UTC]

That stern doesn't even resemble the original!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to Oceanlinerorca [2014-10-25 02:08:50 +0000 UTC]

Thats because they wanted to upgrade her with a modern propulsion system akin to modern liners.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Oceanlinerorca In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2014-10-25 15:45:32 +0000 UTC]

That goes against "a near perfect replica".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to Oceanlinerorca [2014-10-25 16:34:30 +0000 UTC]

Hence the "near" part, as in not an exact, dead on copy. Besides the top half of the stern that sits above the water line is very close to what was designed and built in Belfast over a century ago.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Oceanlinerorca In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2014-10-25 22:57:31 +0000 UTC]

I could point out all the other things that are wrong with this deign and defy being a true replica: azimuth propeller pods, bow thrusters, helipad on the stern with no docking bridge, no boilers or reciprocating steam engines, radar, etc.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to Oceanlinerorca [2014-10-25 23:25:17 +0000 UTC]

Oh Christ, get over it! Its a "halted" project that likely wont come to anything any way so get off my back, you dont like it then scroll on.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NEJOS [2014-10-24 22:55:39 +0000 UTC]

Titanic II looks stunning!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to NEJOS [2014-10-24 23:26:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you my friend.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperR-Illustrations [2014-10-24 21:23:15 +0000 UTC]

Is it iceberg-proof?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to SuperR-Illustrations [2014-10-24 21:37:52 +0000 UTC]

Okay first as horrible as that joke was it had me rolling on the floor with laughter. Second according to what Ive observed and read of the plans, she is hardly berg proof but it will considerably harder to send this one to the bottom given her modern safety applications in accordance with maritime law.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SuperR-Illustrations In reply to ERIC-ARTS-inc [2014-10-24 22:13:10 +0000 UTC]

Just watch out for icebergs!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to SuperR-Illustrations [2014-10-24 22:14:48 +0000 UTC]

LMAO!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Titanicfan1000 [2014-10-24 19:51:35 +0000 UTC]

It is must for every Titanic fan to travel aboard that liner.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ERIC-ARTS-inc In reply to Titanicfan1000 [2014-10-24 20:15:44 +0000 UTC]

Not going to lie, I would relish the chance to sail aboard this liner as well. But Im traveling First Class I declare it lol.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0