HOME | DD

ericgl1996 — Vigoroth Split Evolution

#evolution #fakemon #gamefreak #nintendo #pokemon #pokemonevolution #slaking #slakoth #normaltype #pokemondesign #creaturesinc #fakemonevolution #thepokemoncompany #splitevolution #slakingpokemon #slakothpokemon #vigorothpokemon #fakemonsplitevolution #pokemonsplitevolution #vigoroth #normaltypepokemon #pokemonfakemon #fakemonpokemon #normaltypefakemon #fakemondesign
Published: 2022-01-26 20:13:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 13636; Favourites: 64; Downloads: 2
Redirect to original
Description What if Vigoroth got itself a split evolution? Well, i decided to give Vigoroth a split evolution is mainly because i wanted to make a split evolution for Vigoroth but without the Truant ability that Slakoth and Slaking had, the Vigoroth split evolution will only have the Vital Spirit ability just like its pre-evolve form, Vigoroth. The only way to evolve Vigoroth into the Vigoroth split evolution is simply evolve Vigoroth into the Vigoroth split evolution when exposed to a Translucent Stone (Translucent Stone is another completely new evolutionary stone and i'll upload that picture of the Translucent Stone for another day).

Oh by the way, what both the name, stats and moves would be? Please leave a comment of what name, stats and moves for the Vigoroth split evolution would be.

Pokémon series © The Pokémon Company / Pokémon Ltd. / Nintendo Co., Ltd. / Creatures Inc. / Game Freak Inc.
Related content
Comments: 14

JustinEpicz [2024-08-22 16:27:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

devlin4birds [2023-05-08 22:15:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

ericgl1996 In reply to devlin4birds [2023-05-09 20:13:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ericgl1996 In reply to devlin4birds [2023-05-09 00:37:44 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Daskarios [2022-01-27 21:03:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

PALURDS [2022-01-27 05:50:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

CreaturemasterProds [2022-01-27 05:02:44 +0000 UTC]

👍: 3 ⏩: 0

Silent-N [2022-01-27 02:26:49 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

WildbugWarrior1545 [2022-01-27 02:21:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zmeyer [2022-01-26 23:40:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

Zmeyer In reply to Zmeyer [2022-01-26 23:54:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Joshuat1306 [2022-01-26 21:02:10 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

ericgl1996 In reply to Joshuat1306 [2022-01-26 21:43:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Joshuat1306 In reply to ericgl1996 [2022-01-26 21:55:27 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0