Comments: 992
Blewdowner76 [2021-02-06 20:48:49 +0000 UTC]
absolutely gorgeous and love this.. want a poster of this. by any chance you have a color version of it.
π: 0 β©: 0
PanamaGamesArtWork [2016-05-14 21:01:46 +0000 UTC]
Kinda new quality Fallout 4 mod. Dont take this seriously.
π: 0 β©: 0
Bill1944Blue [2015-05-08 22:05:25 +0000 UTC]
Never seen a stock that short
π: 0 β©: 0
MusicAndMovies1993 [2014-01-24 19:37:34 +0000 UTC]
Ehhh, shotguns don't make very good sniper guns, and I'll give you three reasons for why that is:
#1: Shotguns don't have as far a range as sniper rifles do.
#2: Shotguns are loud, while sniper rifles are silent.
#3: Shotguns fire pellets, or "Buck Shots" that scatter over a wide range, while sniper rifles fire bullets that go straight over a long range, and are much more accurate than "Buck Shots".
In short, shotguns are best used in close-quarter gunfights while sniper rifles are....what the.....HOLY SHIT! SHE'S NOT WEARING ANY UNDERWEAR!!!
π: 0 β©: 2
Bill1944Blue In reply to MusicAndMovies1993 [2015-05-08 22:10:29 +0000 UTC]
But. for up close, with a 26 inch barrel, you can bring down a pissed off bear with one once sludge.
π: 0 β©: 0
Snowman251 In reply to MusicAndMovies1993 [2014-02-21 23:45:58 +0000 UTC]
#2: Β Sniper rifles are extremely loud unless you attach a silencer. Even with one they aren't silent. That is a myth.
#3: Shotguns can fire a wide range of ammunition types beyond just buckshot. For example, slugs are not pellets but a single large "bullet". Furthermore, Β long range rifle projectiles do not "go straight", they arc based on force, gravity, wind, and many other external affects.Β
All that being said, the words "Shotgun" and "Sniper" should never be used together.Β
π: 1 β©: 1
DigitalInked [2013-09-28 22:57:57 +0000 UTC]
you haven't lived until you've shot at something while not wearing pants...
π: 0 β©: 0
Nixon4lyfe [2013-08-25 11:51:52 +0000 UTC]
No trigger discipline/10.
π: 0 β©: 0
deviantoptimus [2013-06-12 22:10:37 +0000 UTC]
too bad your cover will be blown when you pull the trigger
π: 0 β©: 0
ZK-Cultus [2012-11-08 04:21:51 +0000 UTC]
Those pellets are just going to feel like hail by the time they get to the ground... Nice, uh, belt though.
π: 0 β©: 0
new9999 [2012-10-23 17:27:57 +0000 UTC]
pretty good
π: 0 β©: 0
BillyEgregio [2012-10-10 12:59:59 +0000 UTC]
why the funk she's naked with a shotgun?
π: 0 β©: 1
SafariBear In reply to BillyEgregio [2012-10-30 19:40:01 +0000 UTC]
Well, better than dressed with a shotgun!
π: 0 β©: 0
Spudgun1980 [2012-09-20 21:52:58 +0000 UTC]
It would probably be extremely funny to se what she looks like the second after she fires that shotgun.
π: 0 β©: 1
slap-you-lil-bitch [2012-09-16 02:43:58 +0000 UTC]
Shotgun sniper? That makes perfectly no sense at all.
π: 0 β©: 1
sw-357-magnum [2012-07-25 11:02:35 +0000 UTC]
very nice picture, but ... sniping with a shotgun ?? Wouldn't be very effective.
π: 0 β©: 0
Epzi10n [2012-07-11 20:40:14 +0000 UTC]
...No...
π: 0 β©: 0
nekokittin [2012-06-21 22:00:00 +0000 UTC]
Remind me not to knock on you door lol
π: 0 β©: 0
magenguy [2012-06-09 05:08:24 +0000 UTC]
Pretty
π: 0 β©: 0
Maxwell207CRM [2012-05-31 17:32:42 +0000 UTC]
Has it occurred to anyone else she might have been sleeping when awakened suddenly and needing to grab her home-defence rig? That said, elbow off the railing next time (hard [like an elbow] to soft [sandbag] or soft [like tricep] to hard [like that railing], hard to hard is less stable), and why is she pointing a shotgun (effective range 65-130 feet) from so high up? If it's the only thing available, I could see it. Better than a handgun, certainly, but not one's first choice.
Other than that, not sure why the belts are there maybe she wasn't sleeping, maybe she and a friend were interrupted? Also, she must have seen something she doesn't like, or else she chooses to disregard basic safety (finger on the trigger).
Then again, I'm really not sure why she's leaning on the railing at all. Even with a rifle, if you had run out to investigate something that would not be your first thought.
π: 0 β©: 2
HectorErus In reply to Maxwell207CRM [2012-06-04 20:20:53 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps, given we don't know the layout of the place, she is awaiting to ambush the intruder/attacker through a window, fire escape, or just other section of the patio behind the photographer?
Just the first possibilities that popped to mind.
Regardless, lovely photo.
π: 0 β©: 0
Maxwell207CRM In reply to Maxwell207CRM [2012-05-31 17:48:07 +0000 UTC]
Also, going by the lack of other firearm-involved pictures in your gallery these seems almost like you woke up one day and were like "I'm gonna put a picture of someone 'sniping' with a shotgun on DA and see how many people I troll LOLOLOL".
Can't really verify whether that went through your head or not, but yeah...
π: 0 β©: 0
metalmilitia3194 [2012-04-01 21:07:40 +0000 UTC]
Alrighty.. First and foremost it's not that difficult to get your hands on a rifle, no matter where you are or your local gun laws, if you want it you can find it. The sense of power and sexuality could have been achieved with rifle designed for this kind of shot, give it a sleek stock with smooth lines and nice flow, along with a scope that makes a statement but isn't so big that it makes her look like she's compensating for anything (not saying she has anything to compensate for).
As far as what's behind the gun, i'm certainly not complaining about seeing a beautiful woman with no pants on, but there is a time and place for everything, and here and now is not a place to have the carpet out for all to see. Personally i'm thinking some panties, not dental floss, er, a thong i mean, or g-string. No i mean a serious pair of panties, black/dark blue, with a little bit of lace, but not enough for it to be frilly or overly feminine.
Another thing to consider is for her to actually pick a target when she's aiming, because right now she has this... off into space look, like she's just standing there, holding the gun because she was told to. I challange you to crate the scene. MAKE US BELIEVE THAT YOU CAPTURED THE MOMENT! you may know it's not real, we may know it's not real, but just for a moment make us believe, draw us in, and leave us wanting more by leaving some mystery to the girl.
Over all nice piece, but i'd love to see you run farther with this idea. If you need ideas for weapons to use i'm certain your fellow users would be more than happy to help you =]
π: 0 β©: 1
SwaEgo [2012-03-20 05:15:14 +0000 UTC]
Π’Π°ΠΊ Π²ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ°Ρ, ΠΠΈΠΊΠΈΡΠ°
π: 0 β©: 0
Sxiondrasiel [2012-03-20 01:58:48 +0000 UTC]
Awesome
π: 0 β©: 0
Jarhead105 [2012-03-08 16:11:06 +0000 UTC]
sniping with a shotgun is redundant. nice body though.
π: 0 β©: 2
M-Jiggy-D In reply to Jarhead105 [2012-06-11 13:53:02 +0000 UTC]
just watch battlefield 3: a shotgun with 7x scope rifle... that IS a sniper shotgun! xD
π: 0 β©: 0
Maxwell207CRM In reply to Jarhead105 [2012-05-31 17:36:40 +0000 UTC]
I get what you're trying to say, but it's not "redundant". Guntaping two shotguns together, running a ziptie through the trigger loops and using the setup at close range would be redundant. Or getting two different snipers to snipe one person at the same time. Or calling in an airstrike to kill a single fireteam. Think of redundancy as "effective, but maybe 'too effective'"... sniping with a shotgun is ineffective, and just plain silly.
π: 0 β©: 0
Alembic-Lynx [2012-02-13 22:39:58 +0000 UTC]
lovely
π: 0 β©: 0
RampageSixx [2012-01-28 19:05:13 +0000 UTC]
One question? only becouse i was a sniper in the army... how the hell do you snipe with a shotgun? which by the looks of it is old Remington 500?
π: 0 β©: 1
Jarhead105 In reply to RampageSixx [2012-03-08 16:10:11 +0000 UTC]
uhm.. sniper in the Army? and you dont know that remington never made a 500 model? Remington makes an 870, not a 500. 500's are made by mossberg.
π: 0 β©: 1
Maxwell207CRM In reply to Jarhead105 [2012-05-31 17:39:35 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I would expect an army sniper to be able to spell "although". Also, it's a rare sniper who admits to loving Pokemon. Not saying it couldn't happen, but I'm calling bollocks. Identify verification or it never happened.
π: 0 β©: 0
chadbaker [2011-12-30 03:44:26 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of Christina Ricci. Hot.
π: 0 β©: 0
N-O-B-S [2011-10-31 15:16:45 +0000 UTC]
Interesting concept, sniping with a shotgun... I foresee some ' collateral damage'...
π: 0 β©: 0
olafanderson [2011-10-04 21:24:03 +0000 UTC]
Interesting shot but ridiculous concept, a shotgun is useless for long range.
π: 0 β©: 0
Sheol-Atou [2011-09-27 01:49:05 +0000 UTC]
this is a nice pictures.
I especially love the pose and how thin her legs ar-holyshit
she doesn't have on any pants
ΰ² _ΰ²
π: 0 β©: 0
M3D13V4L [2011-09-11 02:28:27 +0000 UTC]
It's contradictory, impractical, and illogical. I hate it, as do many others. Even with slugs a trained individual like myself wouldn't dream of hitting anything from that high up/far away.
π: 0 β©: 2
chadbaker In reply to M3D13V4L [2011-12-30 03:46:11 +0000 UTC]
She doesn't have on pants, you douche. Maybe she's about to shoot someone on the adjacent balcony...Just enjoy the furburger.
π: 0 β©: 2
Maxwell207CRM In reply to chadbaker [2012-05-31 17:40:21 +0000 UTC]
>>adjacent balcony
>>clearly aiming at something on the ground, finger ready to fire
She must be a really bad shot if she's about to shoot someone on the adjacent balcony, jeepers.
π: 0 β©: 0
M3D13V4L In reply to chadbaker [2012-01-01 19:47:30 +0000 UTC]
I'm not a mindless hound. I come to this site for art.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dekler In reply to M3D13V4L [2011-09-26 21:32:05 +0000 UTC]
And she's not wearing pants.
Seriously, missing the point.
π: 0 β©: 1
M3D13V4L In reply to Dekler [2011-09-28 16:08:01 +0000 UTC]
While I don't consider this art, it seems that you and this piece's proprietor do. I suppose art doesn't have a rigid set of criteria, and instead is highly subjective. I guess I just need to try to grasp that not everyone thinks like me.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dekler In reply to M3D13V4L [2011-09-28 16:39:55 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, that was TOTALLY the point I was trying to make. Not how "using a shotgun as a sniper is not logical" is a TOTALLY valid argument to use against someone who's on a balcony without any pants.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>