Comments: 24
F16CrewChief In reply to Hun100D [2013-07-05 13:09:04 +0000 UTC]
I am pretty sure that economics of maintaining an old acft (The "A's" were FY 1966 and 1967 acft) and engines killed the Spark Vark.
π: 0 β©: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to Hun100D [2013-07-06 13:53:18 +0000 UTC]
You need to really look back. The F-4E was in front line service for less than a decade before the F-15A started to replace it. The first production F-4Es were FY 1966 models and the first F-15Es assigned to the 1st TFW (a CC coded unit) were FY 1974 acft. The USAF and USN sorta replaced 'first line' acft with about 8-10 years in service. Now that acft are so ridiculously 'gold plated' an acft system will be in service for 30+ years or more. The F-16C/D's that I took from the GD factory in 1988 are still in service 25 years later, w/ the F-35A still over 5 years out.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hun100D [2013-07-04 23:32:44 +0000 UTC]
Shoot... they should have been long-lived! Ravens did RULE!
π: 0 β©: 1
griffonmeister [2012-11-11 06:57:15 +0000 UTC]
This and the F111F P/Tack. Great machines.
π: 0 β©: 1
griffonmeister In reply to F16CrewChief [2012-11-11 16:57:58 +0000 UTC]
Me too, but I think that's evident by my likes and comments!
π: 0 β©: 0
BOBSZY [2010-06-20 06:23:28 +0000 UTC]
Being in your position, what are the feelings about the F-111. Good bad or indifferent?
π: 0 β©: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to BOBSZY [2010-06-20 18:45:29 +0000 UTC]
The Vark started service with a bad record. The TF33 engines were the first afterburning turbofans, and the engine had some real probles in early service. At the end of it's service life, the F-111 was the best low level penetrator in the world. the F-111F with the Pave Tack pod was truly unbeatable. Economics forced the USAF retirement.
π: 0 β©: 1
NavJAG [2010-06-15 19:40:50 +0000 UTC]
Really like that paint scheme - suits the Vark nicely!
π: 0 β©: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to putrick [2010-06-14 23:34:24 +0000 UTC]
No the tactical jamming mission is left to the Navy right now.
π: 0 β©: 0
AviatorGriffin [2010-06-14 02:06:21 +0000 UTC]
The spark vark, I have heard of it wasn't it used for jamming enemy radar?
π: 0 β©: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to AviatorGriffin [2010-06-14 09:00:51 +0000 UTC]
Yes. It was equivelant to an EA-6B or an EF-18G.
π: 0 β©: 1