HOME | DD

Fanged-Fury21 β€” The Poisoned Well of Good Faith of Male Gamers
#gamers #videogame #videogames #gamergate
Published: 2015-08-07 01:09:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 1052; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

Okay so I wasn't really sure how to start this and you could skip to the part after the space for the main part of the article. I admit I never really wrote an article before and the subject in question for this one is gonna twist the panties of a lot of cheaply dyed, rainbow-haired, upper class twits into a knot. See this article you are reading before you is covering gamer girls and how they poison the well of good faith for female gamers. Something I want you to keep in mind is that gamer girls in this context doesn't- does not- just refer to women who play games solely for attention but rather also refer to guys who pretend to be girls to get items and gear without putting the effort in themselves. I'm saying both sexes have fucked with good faith of male gamers. I'm also gonna try to keep this as short as possible.


Its no lie that gamers get a lot of flak. I've gotten my fair share and then some. But when you are asked to prove yourself, to prove your gaming credentials there's this unspoken rule: Put up or shut up. Now that comes across as sexist to some people but is it really?

Since nearly its inception, gaming has been called a boys club even though that's been farther from the truth than anyone could really expect and the claim is usually coming from people detached from the community(and a lot of games journalist but that's an article in the making for another time). Male gamers, for the most part, actually want more women playing games you'd expect to be on consoles, both home and portable, and gaming PCs rather than just mobile games which I mention because the skewed statistics involving male and female gamers(again article for another time). They want to share their world, their hobby with more women, after all Video Games is the most inclusive hobby out there, but this of course is where the well gets poisoned.

They want so desperately to have more women enjoying the hobby that they are easily fooled by people claiming to be women or claiming to enjoy the hobby. Other male gamers realize they could fool these poor guys into giving them free gear and items while women who thrive off attention but don't actually like video games beyond the attention it gives them reap the special treatment they get just for being a women who game. And this happens time and time again because they don't want to believe anyone is just going to take advantage of their good-natured desire to include more people in the hobby they love and enjoy. But of course they eventually start believing it because their optimism about the situation has been worn down to the point of non-existence.

So what does this mean exactly?

For the most part, if you are a female gamer, one who genuine loves this shared hobby of ours and you are asked to prove your gaming credentials, don't take offence to it, don't get angry, have some sympathy because while they won't necessarily ask other guys they dawn well do expect the guys to prove themselves as well and they aren't asking you to prove yourself so much as they are asking that you prove their reason to be skeptic of you wrong.

But if you do take offence to it, ask yourself: Were you maybe expecting to get special treatment just because you are a woman? And if so, maybe ask yourself if other people like you have already poisoned the well of good faith from male gamers.

So is it bad that women are more vocally asked to prove themselves? Not gonna lie, it is. But is there a reason for that beyond the extremely lazy claims of sexism? Without a doubt in my mind, yes.

As for solutions to this problem? I honestly don't know where to begin. Dicks and assholes will be dicks and assholes after all so there's no asking the guys pretending to be girls and the girls who want a gaming sugar daddy to stop. Skeptical guys could start vocally asking more male newcomers to prove themselves too and girls could look at things from the guys' perspective.

Actually scratch that last part, I think we should all start looking at each others perspective more often because we may find the lines that divide us didn't really exist to begin with but then again what do I know, I'm going to be dismissed for being a cis, β€œstraight, white” male by those cheaply dyed hair upper class twits I mentioned earlier instead of what I said.


Feel free to tell me what you think of the situation and what solutions

Related content
Comments: 10

Neegan6 [2016-07-05 20:58:09 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fanged-Fury21 In reply to Neegan6 [2016-07-30 01:04:13 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, I know for a fact you have me mistaken for a feminist.

Also were you dropped on your head as a baby or are you just a troll, not that there's much difference there.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

planck3462 [2016-01-25 02:53:02 +0000 UTC]

Ok so I read through this whole post and I'm genuinely curious, Β what would you consider as being proof of someone's gaming credentials? Β This has been something about this issue that I've never understood because it seems rather absurdly simple. Β A person either games or they don't.

Also is every comment you get on this post spam? Β I don't see any comments aside from yours

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fanged-Fury21 In reply to planck3462 [2016-02-14 23:05:35 +0000 UTC]

Well for one, it'd be proof you actually play the games you talk about if you actually have knowledge about the game you are talking about and not pulling shit out of your ass to complain about. I apologize for crudeness more to emphasize the point.

And yes, because the bulk majority was coming from one person, and in some cases either their alt or their friend trying to harass me and spam lies about me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NotoDox [2015-11-21 05:59:39 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fanged-Fury21 In reply to NotoDox [2015-11-25 12:43:54 +0000 UTC]

I delete spam and block trolls

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AmandaPeaceLoveSmile [2015-11-15 19:20:32 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fanged-Fury21 In reply to AmandaPeaceLoveSmile [2015-11-15 22:25:06 +0000 UTC]

Not at all. I delete troll posts, you should be thankful I didn't outright block you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AmandaPeaceLoveSmile In reply to Fanged-Fury21 [2015-11-15 22:54:52 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fanged-Fury21 In reply to AmandaPeaceLoveSmile [2015-11-15 23:09:47 +0000 UTC]

Never said any such thing.
And I delete your posts because instead of being a decent human being, you go across my deviatation, spamming my account with your bullshit. And you know one, keep your non-existent citations, I don't have to take this shit. I don't. Congrats your are the first person I've blocked.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fanged-Fury21 [2015-11-15 17:26:54 +0000 UTC]

I want to take this moment to say something. If you come onto my pages, and accusing me of something I didn't do, I will hand you your ass. As was the case with the above/below spam I'll explain.

I proved someone wrong here on DA and they blocked me. I screencapped the comment I would have given, along with a second version with proof of the block.
After a conversation with someone who was actually willing to talk things out, the person I previously proved wrong had the gaul/audacity/temerity, to make a comment to that person stating that I blocked them for proving me wrong, which is ridiculous as I don't block anyone especially not because a debate and would have no need to do so as my debate skills don't belong in a kindergarten class, but as I said, the person who blocked me saw that I was having a pleasant conversation with someone and decided to post a lie to that person about me.
Now the person who posted the spam, saw the conversation and decided that not only was I somehow stalking someone who only commented on my comment thread because it was my comment thread but then proceeded to post more lies one my page, my favourites, the 2 deviations pointing out the first person's lies but also that somehow this article was rationalizing harassment of female gamers. Now, I haven't blocked that person but let's see if she's willing to back up her big talk.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AmandaPeaceLoveSmile In reply to Fanged-Fury21 [2015-11-15 19:24:25 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fanged-Fury21 In reply to AmandaPeaceLoveSmile [2015-11-15 22:41:15 +0000 UTC]

No, I put it up for reference. And seeing as you can't help but comment on my comments and are stalking me, I gotta let you know, you aren't my type.

I don't block anyone. Not blocking anyone doesn't mean I won't delete troll comments, you seem to think the two go hand in hand.

Never once declared any such thing, nor would I harass someone for evidence they were raped. I asked for evidence of rape and death threats.

Yes solely to attack her... NOT! I pointed out her lies, that simply. And you are tracking down my comments to copy and paste lies about me. Gotta admit, better than the creationists who have done the same.

Show me where I harassed anyone for being a rape victim.... actually just harassed anyone.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AmandaPeaceLoveSmile [2015-11-15 08:05:26 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fanged-Fury21 In reply to AmandaPeaceLoveSmile [2015-11-15 16:10:03 +0000 UTC]

First off, you missed my entire point.
Second, I'm not stalking her, she lied about me claiming I blocked her and I revealed the truth that she lied. Considering how many other people asked for the so called rape and death threats and her response was to basically ignore a simple request for evidence in order to believe her claim to begin with.
Third, no I'm not but please claim I am, your utter lack of rationale debate and complete lack of understanding a point I made, but I'll give you a chance to show you aren't inept. Quote where exactly in the text where I'm rationalizing the harassment of female gamers. You won't be able to, but I'll give you the chance.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AmandaPeaceLoveSmile In reply to Fanged-Fury21 [2015-11-15 19:11:04 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fanged-Fury21 In reply to AmandaPeaceLoveSmile [2015-11-15 22:52:01 +0000 UTC]

1) So it sounds like you think you're the judge of whether or not someone is raped and you inted to attack them in public until they show you "proof"Β ,i>You have incredibly thin skin and you're a hateful little shit with nothing better to do but attack rape victims anonymously.,/i>Β All of that is your claim not mine, and not even based on anything I did.

2) I didn't stalk anyone, she saw my comment, commented to lie about me, I replied back by revealing the truth. Not to call them out because frankly call out only works when the person has any human decency.

3) Well, one of your chums did the same thing, did you report him or are you only targetting me because I'm pro-GG?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0