HOME | DD

Flockhart β€” The Roaring Silence

Published: 2009-02-01 20:58:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 12367; Favourites: 289; Downloads: 606
Redirect to original
Description Variations on a theme - all the usual subjects.
I will probably rework the tower of Babel but we'll see.
Related content
Comments: 47

Shelfcloud [2011-05-18 19:08:34 +0000 UTC]

I just sometimes wonder... It is great work that you produce, and I admire digi-artists as much as normal, nor do I judge anyone. But out of curiousity: don't you have the feeling to want something physical from your result. I mean, like with drawings and paintings you have the real result in front of you on a painting canvas or a frame or such? But with digi-art you store on your HD. You know what I mean? A sort of touchable...

How do you look towards your own results?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to Shelfcloud [2011-05-19 20:09:32 +0000 UTC]

I have to confess I share those feelings and I agree that "real painting" seems so much more physical and real. However art that is not seen, seems almost pointless to me and this (digital via the internet) is a realistic route to having my art seen. Art needs an audience, it is after all about putting some aesthetic content into the world for people to respond to. So if I painted on canvas only one or two people could see the work I do anyway - unless it was on some permanent display in a gallery, (but lets not kid ourselves) So for me the pleasure is certainly in creating Art but it is as much about getting some sort of response to stuff I create. So you can see why digital does that with more ease than oil or acrylic or pencil. I am also aware of the obvious fact that art and the media artists use evolves anyway and we live in a photoshop rich, digitaly saturated, graphically instant electronic age.
Every frame of a great film is in a sense a work of art, as is the totality of the film, yet as you pointed out there is nothing real in any digital format even after thousands of hours of creativity; but would you question the validity of celluloid as an artistic media?
Its a very interesting question though. To be honest I suppose if I was not as lazy I would do the work in paint then simply photograph it and upload it digitally.... I probably should.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shelfcloud In reply to Flockhart [2011-05-20 18:06:14 +0000 UTC]

Not really, others can call it art if an audience is watching it. Like I've said: I respect art in any way with any medium with the same core value. It is the originallity that counts for a part for me. It has its ups and downs, like traditional I guess. With digi-art you can reach unimaginable qualities with a blink of an eye, and even Dylan Cole is one of my favourites, painting months in digi-art. The only thing I wonder how "touchable" the results are as drawing with a pencil gives some kind of feeling, and the work displays more "you" in it; more raw reflection.

Art isn't always visual... it is also the things you DON'T see, but feel, live and inspire and even hear. For movies can also be a form of art, composed as one big huge collaboration. In a case of digital art I think it needs indeed an audience; especially when it comes to movies, but it does not necessarily for traditional. For me not at least... for me it is about getting my emotions down on paper, to forget the troubles of the world and just be myself. To live the creation, to do. I'm not saying that digi-artist can't live the same thing, but it is different. Personally, my drive is not to do it for others/numbers. I've endured too much "friends"-politics while people are too ignorent to respond back, when they say to you how great your art is. Who knows? If you are great in socializing with internet, your art appreciation will be magnified exponentially. It is a status thing and sadly for me that has not much to do with "art".

I appreciate you're beΓ―ng open and honest with this and it's a interesting discussion!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperSmurgger [2011-02-05 08:20:33 +0000 UTC]

For those who didn't understand yet, this work is a pure masterpiece !!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to SuperSmurgger [2011-02-05 23:33:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you I'm glad you like it - and get it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SuperSmurgger In reply to Flockhart [2011-02-06 16:15:32 +0000 UTC]

You're very Welcome !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ScottMan2th [2011-02-03 01:56:00 +0000 UTC]

Chaos is seen where none exist to those who fail to see or know where to look...in subtle shadow and flickering light dreams are made manifest within the realm of the yet to be...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to ScottMan2th [2011-02-05 23:35:53 +0000 UTC]

I Like that - and it resonates with the picture and the stuff in my head Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ScottMan2th In reply to Flockhart [2011-02-06 00:06:52 +0000 UTC]

I try to capture my first impressions of someone’s art this way...it’s my way of thanking them for sharing there creativity and giving me the chance to write...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

furnituresig [2011-01-31 21:42:55 +0000 UTC]

really great, how paintings should be, super worked and excellent detail

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheForestWithin [2010-11-15 07:56:57 +0000 UTC]

very amazing work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to TheForestWithin [2010-11-15 14:31:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank very much comments are always appreciated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Blue-Puppet [2010-05-27 11:57:02 +0000 UTC]

Fabulous Work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mode-Hex [2010-05-03 23:00:27 +0000 UTC]

Mindblowing.
Thank you , Paul ~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

whitewave-moth [2009-11-20 22:53:04 +0000 UTC]

such detail - love the horse the best

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

janellemckain [2009-08-23 15:30:21 +0000 UTC]

WOW!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MellissaAF [2009-07-04 15:31:06 +0000 UTC]

WOW! I love your style, It is really unique and that can be hard to find on DA. I love how things bleed into others and become something else. It almost looks like your painting in overlapping different dimensions. Each focal point catches your eye, then teases you in different directions all over. Wonderfully done!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ABDportraits [2009-06-22 03:41:29 +0000 UTC]

Paul, your whole work is really amazing, and so modern. I see a sort of synthesis between Bruegel (and Bosch), Gigger, Botticelli and Dali, but your way to treat the subjetcs is very personnal, tha's why it's interesting. Each of your artwork is a kind of "scene-story" and seems infinite. Congratulations !
I'll definitely watch you !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chuckometti [2009-05-30 17:07:38 +0000 UTC]

very beautiful
your style is absolutely unique, still your pictures somehow remind me of hieronymus bosch's work^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to chuckometti [2009-05-30 17:25:48 +0000 UTC]

Any! comparison to Bosch is mindblowingly flattering "big grin" and thanks muchly

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Bnspyrd [2009-04-01 07:47:25 +0000 UTC]

Gosh! So much detail.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BigBad-Red [2009-03-26 13:23:01 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work
What program do you use to create your art?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Livor-Mortiis [2009-03-07 11:51:24 +0000 UTC]

Very beautiful!! It reminds me to Botticelli

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Crazywulf [2009-02-21 06:33:04 +0000 UTC]

excellent piece

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chosy [2009-02-12 09:44:49 +0000 UTC]

impressive as always

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FreakyBabe [2009-02-11 18:55:19 +0000 UTC]

this is quite beautiful, love the watercolour atmosphere you gave into this piece, and all details look awesome, very well done!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

maxevry [2009-02-09 04:17:28 +0000 UTC]

Your work is very unique!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to maxevry [2009-02-09 15:06:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks and thanks for the fav

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FairieGoodMother [2009-02-07 18:56:57 +0000 UTC]

What Amazing work I love this

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to FairieGoodMother [2009-02-07 20:42:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much - and its nice to know there are some fairy goodmothers about as well as the other kind

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FairieGoodMother In reply to Flockhart [2009-02-08 00:10:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DKHutcheson [2009-02-06 22:11:18 +0000 UTC]

The detail in this is so mind blowing. There are so many hidden surprises. I wonder if I'll ever find them all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to DKHutcheson [2009-02-06 22:58:34 +0000 UTC]

Glad you enjoy it - and thanks for the fav

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

anubis [2009-02-02 20:12:17 +0000 UTC]

Really magical!!!
Tassos

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChristopheDuflot [2009-02-02 19:42:30 +0000 UTC]

What a wonder !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MichaelShapcott [2009-02-02 16:49:39 +0000 UTC]

Extremely moving! I love your work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to MichaelShapcott [2009-02-02 17:03:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks - The pleasure is mutual - I love your combination of renaissance like realism, graphic illustration and beautiful composition. Cheers!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ferii [2009-02-02 14:31:22 +0000 UTC]

geez... yet another master piece! I simply cannot understand how you are able to create such detailed, demonstrative and fine but at the same time extremely surreal art! I LOVE IT! xD (oh and btw I like the palette you've used painting this) *is looking forward for more*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to Ferii [2009-02-02 17:20:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks ! Its the wonder of photoshop I can make as many mistakes as I like without destroying my work - I appreciate the comments its cool when artists take the time to comment on work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ferii In reply to Flockhart [2009-02-02 18:25:35 +0000 UTC]

khehe I personally found the wonders of photoshops recently D I still lack a lot of skill but I totally fell in loooove with undoing xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PSYXXARTS [2009-02-01 22:48:14 +0000 UTC]

You have got to be kidding me! this is beyond words!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to PSYXXARTS [2009-02-02 00:03:15 +0000 UTC]

LOL - Thanks! Much appreciated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

leothefox [2009-02-01 21:10:29 +0000 UTC]

Ooo Pieter Bruegel-ism

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chris10belgium [2009-02-01 21:05:54 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful. Your style is special.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flockhart In reply to chris10belgium [2009-02-01 21:17:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Christine - Now I have a big cheesy grin on my face

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

chris10belgium In reply to Flockhart [2009-02-01 21:42:18 +0000 UTC]

Haha

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chopen [2009-02-01 21:00:55 +0000 UTC]

That's just awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0