HOME | DD
Foxstar241 — (request) NOT accepting neopronouns!
Published: 2016-05-04 02:22:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 507; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Requested by jabbathemuttXe/Xem are probably just uncommon pronouns. I'm not sure
But for the most part, I agree. Some sound like fantasy first names (stuff like Dei and Fae) to be honest, and some are existing words (bun, cat, kit). It pronouns make you look like a dang object!
this took 16 frames btw
Stamplate (c) zara-leventhal
Related content
Comments: 9
the issue is that neopronouns are attention-whoring, a prime example in fact
how is this, you ask?
simple:
you're demanding i pay specific attention to you, stumbling over words to remember your autistic pronouns, if i want you to not blow up like a fucking balloon and screech bloody murder
when you force someone to use your pronouns, you are essentially screaming "PAY ATTENTION TO ME! I SHOULD BE THE CENTER OF ATTENTION IN YOUR SENTENCE!".
in that case, i will start calling you "it", since you have clearly lost the right to be human
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
tbh im fine with it and they/them pronouns
the rest are just ridiculous
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Most of these I can see being a problem
but Xe/Xem pronouns are real.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yep.
Xe/Xem are just an uncommon set of pronouns, the requester just asked me to put that in there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm not here to argue but what's wrong with neopronouns?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
For non-English speakers, it can be difficult to use neopronouns.
it pronouns can make someone seem like an object.
These are just my points though.
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
Ah, I see.
Those are some pretty good points.
Although, I will normally choose to accept any pronouns just as long as they're not COMPLETELY ridiculous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1