HOME | DD

Fragillimus335 β€” Giant Stork of Doom

Published: 2012-09-29 02:28:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 7591; Favourites: 203; Downloads: 43
Redirect to original
Description Giganotosaurus has one of the largest skulls of any known theropod, only Spinosaurus might exceed it. But both pale in comparison to the largest pterosaur,...Hatzegopteryx. Giganotosaurus's 1.8 meter skull is small when compared to this 10 foot monster. When stalking along the ground this monster might have stood taller than a giraffe.
Related content
Comments: 60

FeatherNerd [2016-12-31 17:13:50 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to FeatherNerd [2017-01-03 01:04:36 +0000 UTC]

Because that's what pterosaurs are?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FeatherNerd In reply to Fragillimus335 [2017-01-03 01:17:20 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to FeatherNerd [2017-01-04 19:46:16 +0000 UTC]

Easy there cowboy, I thought you meant reptile by lizard, most laypeople do. Also, spikes scales, and feathers are not mutually exclusive. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FeatherNerd In reply to Fragillimus335 [2017-01-04 20:21:10 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to FeatherNerd [2017-01-09 16:22:00 +0000 UTC]

Most people who are not paleontologists use the word lizard and reptile interchangeably. Β I'm a paleontology grad student, I know what pterosaurs are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

acepredator [2016-10-01 02:37:23 +0000 UTC]

The largest skull of any terrestrial apex predator.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CJCroen [2016-04-03 01:44:47 +0000 UTC]

Awesome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PCAwesomeness [2016-01-19 02:37:24 +0000 UTC]

Forget Giga! Hatz has achieved more!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Terizinosaurus [2015-06-17 12:15:23 +0000 UTC]

IT IS GREAT!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Draconic-Imagineer [2015-05-16 19:55:57 +0000 UTC]

Love it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

7908642 [2014-09-10 03:09:47 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!! Yet again! Love your work, nice pterodon and Giganotosaurus, he was a little bigger than Rex, I'm sure he was stronger, right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to 7908642 [2014-09-10 03:19:29 +0000 UTC]

Probably not, Giganotosaurus had a longer skull, but Tyrannosaurus had the more powerful bite, and was more "muscular" overall. Β If the two were to fight, I assume it would be a tie almost every time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

FeatheredDino In reply to Fragillimus335 [2014-12-21 11:04:53 +0000 UTC]

Giganotosaurus didn't need powerful bites, its teeth were designed to slash meat. Its gape was very wide as well. If Bakker (1998) is right about Allosaurus' jaws, we can also apply the same thing to Giganotosaurus, as both were brontophagus. Giganotosaurus' gape could have been over 2 m wide.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to FeatheredDino [2014-12-21 16:50:23 +0000 UTC]

Yes, that doesn't invalidate my previous statement. Β Gig was a big slasher, rex was a strong crusher. Β Both are roughly tied in the body strength department.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

7908642 In reply to Fragillimus335 [2014-09-10 04:04:06 +0000 UTC]

Yeah your probably right, and if one were to be stronger than the other (whether the rex or giga) the ratio would probably be like 49:51 unless the giga individual was much larger or the other way around.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to 7908642 [2014-09-10 04:06:17 +0000 UTC]

Yep

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePivotFan2013 [2014-03-29 20:28:29 +0000 UTC]

Perfect! I love the way you drew the Hatzegopteryx and the details you made on the Giganotosaurus. You're awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to ThePivotFan2013 [2014-03-29 21:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TeddyBlackBear2040 [2014-02-04 05:08:04 +0000 UTC]

Nice Pic Bro

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to TeddyBlackBear2040 [2014-02-04 05:30:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PencilPavlova [2013-11-17 00:35:05 +0000 UTC]

Are you having a Hatzegopterxy day today? You've certainly posted enough pictures of them

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to PencilPavlova [2013-11-17 01:06:14 +0000 UTC]

Haha, some of them are older!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PencilPavlova In reply to Fragillimus335 [2013-11-17 02:22:45 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Giga-fan123 [2013-11-12 22:31:26 +0000 UTC]

awesome comparison!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KomodoGorgosaurus895 [2013-11-05 02:01:45 +0000 UTC]

Great job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to KomodoGorgosaurus895 [2013-11-05 02:58:14 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Carnosauria [2013-06-21 21:34:20 +0000 UTC]

Why not use Spinosaurus? A 1.8 meters skull is more impressive than 1.5-1.7m skull. However, nice, but Hatzegopteryx isn't larger than Quetzalcoatlus, both were 10-11 meters of wingspam.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to Carnosauria [2013-06-21 21:43:25 +0000 UTC]

I would...but I'm LAZY and already had the Giganotosaurus head done!

Hatzeg's size is up for debate, it would be safer to say it was at least as big as Quetz, maybe a tad bigger, and almost certainly more massive!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theropod1 [2013-05-05 09:21:37 +0000 UTC]

I'm always wondering how on earth an animal with such an absurdely huge skull could only be a fraction of the weight if Giganotosaurus. seems reriously hard to imagint, the skull and neck alone seem as if they could comfortably weigh as much as those of T. rex. It must be highly pneumatic indeed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to theropod1 [2013-05-05 18:14:46 +0000 UTC]

I know, I too have a hard time believing these things only weigh as much as a tiger...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChrisMasna [2013-03-15 18:12:43 +0000 UTC]

I really like this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to ChrisMasna [2013-03-15 20:07:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! That means a lot coming from such a talented artist!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MaxterandKiwiKing [2013-02-14 14:30:59 +0000 UTC]

I've never seen anybody put spines on a pterosaur before.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to MaxterandKiwiKing [2013-02-14 16:23:21 +0000 UTC]

I suppose they are more like large, stiff pycnofibers, but who knows?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpermWhale165 [2012-11-24 02:26:52 +0000 UTC]

The above is quetzalcoatl ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Fragillimus335 In reply to SpermWhale165 [2012-11-24 04:34:26 +0000 UTC]

The species is Hatzegopteryx, perhaps the only pterosaur larger than Quetzalcoatlus.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpermWhale165 In reply to Fragillimus335 [2012-11-24 09:37:36 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, I didn't see it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to SpermWhale165 [2012-11-24 15:51:14 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpermWhale165 In reply to SpermWhale165 [2012-11-24 02:27:17 +0000 UTC]

This is the abbreviation..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theropod1 [2012-11-05 18:02:07 +0000 UTC]

absolutely great work my friend!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to theropod1 [2012-11-05 18:54:41 +0000 UTC]

It's one of my favorites! I like how impressive Hatzegopteryx looks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

theropod1 In reply to Fragillimus335 [2012-11-14 12:19:06 +0000 UTC]

mindblowingly impressive

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Caprisaurus [2012-10-12 20:51:55 +0000 UTC]

Giganotosaurus's skull exceeded Spinosaurus's skull by a few centimetres.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to Caprisaurus [2012-10-13 02:27:34 +0000 UTC]

Gig's holotype skull has been downsized 1.68m, and Spino's was likely longer than 1.75 meters.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gytalf2000 [2012-10-03 13:32:25 +0000 UTC]

Amazing!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to gytalf2000 [2012-10-03 13:35:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Oaglor [2012-10-03 03:23:43 +0000 UTC]

I will need to hide away on the day that the Giraffe-Storks come back.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to Oaglor [2012-10-03 03:38:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpinoInWonderland [2012-10-02 10:08:55 +0000 UTC]

The ironic thing is, that the one with the small-looking skull here, was actually the much larger one of the two...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>