Comments: 37
01202020 [2022-05-20 16:59:19 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ultros8 [2020-11-26 20:00:35 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
PeteriDish [2019-10-07 22:05:14 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Wolfman3200 [2019-09-22 03:02:43 +0000 UTC]
I went back to the National History Museum in my state today and I realized that the skeleton I thought was T.rex as kid, is actually Tabosaurus Bataar. Though, one thing that was wrong about it is that they claim it was 45 feet long, but that is an exaggeration just by looking at the skeleton itself and researching the actual size of Tarbosaurus itself. It just annoys me that many books, some misinformation, and the Weird, N Wild Creatures card make Tarbosaurus larger than T.rex, although the evidence we have says otherwise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MigaraTaurus [2019-06-14 17:51:22 +0000 UTC]
You vs the apex predator she tells you not to worry about
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Hater3D [2019-03-17 17:08:42 +0000 UTC]
those are not tarbosaurus,those are tyrannosaurus,tarbosaurus were a lot small
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Pendragon276 In reply to Hater3D [2019-04-15 03:38:54 +0000 UTC]
Remember I’m not trying to be rude here but he pretty much discusses it in the description and even a basic search on google would give you an idea on the kind of animal Tarbosaurus is.
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
Pendragon276 In reply to Hater3D [2019-04-15 03:37:27 +0000 UTC]
Wrong these are Tarbosaurus skeletals my dude not T.rex, Tarbosaurus was not a small theropod at all. T.bataar could grow up to 5 tons in weight not sure where you picked up the idea they were “small”.
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
tarbano [2018-12-18 07:56:24 +0000 UTC]
Any idea why the snout shapes differ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tarbano [2018-09-11 06:37:46 +0000 UTC]
At Ol' Bataar, my favorite. What would you gander be the average and maximum mass for this species and would you rank it above or below the comparably sized Zhuchengtyrannus in length/mass?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franoys In reply to tarbano [2018-09-11 14:57:53 +0000 UTC]
Average mass... I can not say with the few material that we have, the mass of the largest specimen here is about 5000 kg based on GDI analysis. Zuchengtyrannus measurements are smaller than those of PIN 551-1 on average (I have it scaled here:
) Asuming a similar body plan as suggested per taxonomic studies, Zuchengtyrannus should be lighter, with a body mass of about 4.3 t.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tarbano In reply to Franoys [2018-09-12 04:00:25 +0000 UTC]
And what would you give for a maximum mass for Tarbosaurus bataar? Any off the top of your head hypothesizing why Tyrannosaurus rex was so much wider and bulkier when even at a reasonably comparable length (so a large T.bataar and average size T.rex)?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Majestic-Colossus [2018-08-25 15:25:43 +0000 UTC]
I'd love to see your take on Deinocheirus mirificus. Have you ever considered doing a skeletal restoration of it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franoys In reply to Majestic-Colossus [2018-08-26 00:01:11 +0000 UTC]
I have considered it yes. I have worked with it a bit alredy but never did a fully drawn skeletal. Maybe for when I have a bit more of free time; I have a lot of work to do right now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TKWTH [2018-08-01 08:12:00 +0000 UTC]
The top one's skull looks really weird! Did you account for distortion?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franoys In reply to TKWTH [2018-08-01 08:52:49 +0000 UTC]
Yes
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shaochilong66 [2018-07-11 21:28:20 +0000 UTC]
i n d i v i d u a l v a r i a t i o n
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Paleonerd01 [2018-07-07 11:19:30 +0000 UTC]
Great reconstructions, if possible could you please provide a maxilla Length for PIN 551-2 ZPAL MgD I/4 and ZPAL MgD 107/2? I’d greatly appreciate it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franoys In reply to Evodolka [2018-07-06 04:08:10 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KaprosuchusDragon [2018-07-05 09:49:47 +0000 UTC]
PIN 551-1 looks like a gorgosaurus on steroids
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Cl1ff [2018-07-05 04:29:39 +0000 UTC]
Incredible job! I’ve always loved Tarbosaurus. The variation between individuals is striking. I haven’t drawn anything in a while, but your skeletals have convinced me to start practicing again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franoys In reply to Cl1ff [2018-07-06 04:11:37 +0000 UTC]
Indeed, if you add more crania it is even more striking. Theese two skulls have both issues with preservation ( ZPAL MgD-107/2 has the surface of the bone very deteriorated and is a bit warped, as well as missing part of the nassals); PIN 551-1 is missing the posterior region and the premaxilla, and is a bit low in depth in comparison to other skulls. I tried to correct geological distortion but sticking as much as I could to the preserved fossils; maybe if I speculated a bit more they could have ended slightly more similar (but not much). Tyrannosaurus rex also shows some interesting variation between it's referred specimens.
Also that's nice to hear!. And thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cl1ff In reply to Franoys [2018-07-06 21:25:43 +0000 UTC]
I think you’ve done a stellar job with the distortion. I can imagine it’s pretty tough trying to fix something that’s original shape is unknown.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IsoSobek [2018-07-05 04:07:46 +0000 UTC]
Are you planning on doing a dorsal view of Tarbosaurus by chance?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IsoSobek In reply to Franoys [2018-07-05 04:09:57 +0000 UTC]
Okay, can't wait hehe
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
105697 [2018-07-05 03:15:35 +0000 UTC]
Nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franoys In reply to 105697 [2018-07-05 03:20:30 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0