HOME | DD

fredfree β€” functions within

Published: 2007-06-26 14:29:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 2525; Favourites: 80; Downloads: 56
Redirect to original
Description full title: implications for functions within


{they are subject to more frequent accidents and require more attention.}
Related content
Comments: 44

mertonparrish [2010-12-17 15:49:24 +0000 UTC]

I remember that tv... I believe it was in our den, and I broke off its antennae making "forts" with blankets, chairs, etc. Antennae do not make very good supports for forts with blanket walls!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to mertonparrish [2010-12-24 14:22:51 +0000 UTC]

i remember forts and various falling down supports.
maybe that's why i really left architecture...hmm.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mertonparrish In reply to fredfree [2010-12-27 14:51:06 +0000 UTC]

Oh, lol!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

woefoep [2009-02-13 20:03:36 +0000 UTC]

Great stuff 4 inspiration. Me like.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

uniquexm [2008-11-21 01:05:31 +0000 UTC]

love this style

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to uniquexm [2008-11-21 13:45:28 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much/
for the fave as well.
:}

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

evren-ince [2007-08-27 19:30:11 +0000 UTC]

daaaa daaaa daaaaa ih lips du mich du mic mΓΌckh dich blaaa blaaa blaaaa nice,great.nice gallery

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to evren-ince [2007-08-28 00:20:39 +0000 UTC]

thank you. :]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fleetofgypsies [2007-07-02 04:46:00 +0000 UTC]

the transparency of film, monitors and certain smiles

betty [avatar] says: 'oppy frad, juz l'ahk mah gurm!'

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to fleetofgypsies [2007-07-02 12:33:00 +0000 UTC]

oh that betty. i never know what she's going to say. still don't!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KUBA-KLIP [2007-07-01 20:59:17 +0000 UTC]

Hi FF
What can one say, VERY VERY nice
I really like the sombre tone, the transparency
the colors, the composition

GRRREAT!
luv
KUBA

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to KUBA-KLIP [2007-07-02 12:32:47 +0000 UTC]

hey thanks KK. where ya been hiding??

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gregoriousone [2007-06-29 02:25:07 +0000 UTC]

tradigital-riffic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to gregoriousone [2007-06-29 18:25:27 +0000 UTC]

thankya g.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

iamabee [2007-06-28 07:03:59 +0000 UTC]

i would buy this and throw my television out!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to iamabee [2007-06-28 22:45:31 +0000 UTC]

no don't so that!
my art doesn't get the FOX news channel!
how will you know what to think?!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

iamabee In reply to fredfree [2007-07-10 03:04:45 +0000 UTC]

i think? i dont think! how can you say something so rude! im a celebrity! what else do i need thinking for to do? no sense this makes im pretty huh?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to iamabee [2007-07-10 13:10:24 +0000 UTC]

paula abdul!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

iamabee In reply to fredfree [2007-07-18 02:30:37 +0000 UTC]

paris spears

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kareemrizk [2007-06-28 01:04:38 +0000 UTC]

nice work.
i was extra keen to see this latest post when i saw the digital symbol next to the title;
we don't often see FF doing digital.
keep it up i say.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to kareemrizk [2007-06-28 22:51:38 +0000 UTC]

i used to do more digi stuff, but had settled into a more traditional comfort zone. there will be more. thanks k.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theartoflamb [2007-06-27 08:11:09 +0000 UTC]

very possibly my favorite of yours.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to theartoflamb [2007-06-27 20:47:56 +0000 UTC]

very cool.
thanks for that.
and the fave thingo too.
!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tomhead [2007-06-27 08:06:16 +0000 UTC]

that's ace. i love the contrast between the black(dark greyish) background and the slight orangy colours. !!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to tomhead [2007-06-27 20:49:55 +0000 UTC]

thanks, appreciate you looking.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

areml [2007-06-27 06:16:45 +0000 UTC]

stereophonic domesticity, the boob tube and tradigital dreams.

inspiring.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to areml [2007-06-27 20:50:40 +0000 UTC]

nice phrase-ology.
thanks sir.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

triscuitbox [2007-06-27 05:00:12 +0000 UTC]

this seems different then your other work?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to triscuitbox [2007-06-27 20:52:46 +0000 UTC]

slightly maybe - it's tradigital.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

itslikeametaphor [2007-06-27 00:43:22 +0000 UTC]

nice job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to itslikeametaphor [2007-06-27 00:58:42 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

irk [2007-06-26 23:28:57 +0000 UTC]

Want want want want want want want want want want want as a print. [If you've got the DPIs for it.]

Lovely greyed browns in here, and I like that you've made an overall dark composition. I feel that I can just watch this instead of TV.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

fredfree In reply to irk [2007-07-04 20:12:12 +0000 UTC]

the print is up.
thanks for shopping at freemart.
[and if you're not interested anymore - no big deal.]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fredfree In reply to irk [2007-06-26 23:46:57 +0000 UTC]

that's cool, thanks irk.
[although i hope your TV doesn't notice - i'd feel just awful]
i do have the DPI and was thinking of making it a print so i'm you have some interest in that. i'll let you know when i do it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

violetlove [2007-06-26 23:07:46 +0000 UTC]

golly! this is awesome, mr. free. and i don't mean that in an eddie haskell kind of way.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to violetlove [2007-06-26 23:43:25 +0000 UTC]

maybe in a lumpy sort of way?

thanks ms love!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

violetlove In reply to fredfree [2007-06-27 01:59:44 +0000 UTC]

i'm not lumpy as far as you know.

you're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to violetlove [2007-06-27 20:54:25 +0000 UTC]

so you would think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

violetlove In reply to fredfree [2007-06-27 21:59:52 +0000 UTC]

so i would know!

er...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

saturninus [2007-06-26 21:49:34 +0000 UTC]

smiling is always a solution.
even when you are not sure what is going on, or what is it all about.
international conferences serve good examples of that.

bite off the screen, and beware of magnetophone-boobs!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to saturninus [2007-06-26 23:44:07 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cogwurx [2007-06-26 16:47:16 +0000 UTC]

Clever. I like all the subtlety of this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fredfree In reply to cogwurx [2007-06-26 23:44:53 +0000 UTC]

thank you sir.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tordo [2007-06-26 15:02:25 +0000 UTC]

Indeed complex tasks requires skilled personnel.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0