Comments: 14
Bazilisk [2010-04-06 04:03:40 +0000 UTC]
Damn man. Cool. Even cooler that the blank figure was a mistake.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jsut [2010-03-17 20:42:26 +0000 UTC]
Holy shit! This is pretty damn cool!
How many layers of transparencies did you go through to get this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gearmond In reply to jsut [2010-03-17 20:51:40 +0000 UTC]
technically one transparency, and the back is printer paper on the verge of running out of ink. hence the accidentally blank figure, and the lines near the bottom
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jsut In reply to Gearmond [2010-03-17 21:14:40 +0000 UTC]
A happy accident, then, unless what you were trying to do intentionally would have been better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gearmond In reply to jsut [2010-03-17 21:30:59 +0000 UTC]
well it just improved what i wanted to do :0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ivebeentired [2010-03-16 20:21:19 +0000 UTC]
I really like these, they look like multiple exposures on film!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gearmond In reply to ivebeentired [2010-03-16 21:14:28 +0000 UTC]
multi layered transparencies ftw
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ivebeentired In reply to Gearmond [2010-03-16 22:15:25 +0000 UTC]
As in, the things for overhead projectors?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
starlightofdawn [2010-03-14 00:18:09 +0000 UTC]
Cool use of lines and texture! The flare of light at the top right is really compositionally nice too. I wish it had a little less grain though, which kinda distracts the eye.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gearmond In reply to starlightofdawn [2010-03-14 01:05:03 +0000 UTC]
yeah, the printer ran out of ink, and ma camera is lame :c
it was on a transparency so it had all this inherent clear noise on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0