HOME | DD

Gonzale — red

Published: 2006-04-13 18:48:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 1234; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 370
Redirect to original
Description taken on the same day as my previous id, by ~oye , with my camera, on the roll *guost and i shared. hence the double exposed bit.

boo !
Related content
Comments: 25

godhatesphysics [2006-05-05 02:00:20 +0000 UTC]

*waves*. I finally got through enough deviations to reach yours again! *Cheer*

Boy, you uploaded a lot. Uhh.. wee

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mergana [2006-04-25 09:58:06 +0000 UTC]

Comment ça se fait qu'une toute petite partie seulement soit (comment on dit en français? ) double-exposed?
C'était la fin de la pellicule?

En tout cas, j'aime beaucoup, c'est unique.
Jolie ID!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MovE1 [2006-04-20 18:33:02 +0000 UTC]

joli regard , j'aime bien la pause et cette foto en général

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ankooo [2006-04-15 11:59:44 +0000 UTC]

Tes photos me donnent envie de m'intéresser à la double-exposition
Argentiquement parlant (ça fait intelligent de dire ça je trouve :'] ), c'est le fait d'utiliser la même pellicule deux fois, en fait?

Ca rend vachement bien en tous cas.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

soundgum [2006-04-15 11:11:23 +0000 UTC]

well it looks i bit red

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ingrid-fabiola [2006-04-15 10:47:00 +0000 UTC]

Picking nose?
I second Suzages comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Suzage [2006-04-14 14:44:44 +0000 UTC]

Oh I like this very much. It has a bit of an Andy Warhol vibe going on.
Double exposures are the shit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FiLH [2006-04-14 05:49:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

computerarestupid [2006-04-14 05:16:09 +0000 UTC]

On dirait une tueuse en série

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Adeu [2006-04-13 21:58:43 +0000 UTC]

On dirait un fantôme tout rouge

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Scooly [2006-04-13 21:26:23 +0000 UTC]

AWESOME!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fatpigsrule-3 [2006-04-13 20:54:01 +0000 UTC]

ohh red

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

black-magdalena [2006-04-13 19:47:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

graffit [2006-04-13 19:15:33 +0000 UTC]

Les yeux de poisson rouge.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pulso [2006-04-13 18:59:42 +0000 UTC]

double exposures...
(what is that white thingy on her/your head/hair? there in the nose axis... i'd get that "cloned off")

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to pulso [2006-04-13 19:02:09 +0000 UTC]

oh yeah true. dust. i'll do that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pulso In reply to Gonzale [2006-04-13 19:23:17 +0000 UTC]

yay!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zort [2006-04-13 18:58:51 +0000 UTC]

very artsy-fartsy.

msn.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to zort [2006-04-13 19:00:09 +0000 UTC]

ookkk

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tndfx [2006-04-13 18:56:57 +0000 UTC]

look, its her, i saw that girl running in a video... looked like a remake of "saving private ryan"!

this is great.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to tndfx [2006-04-13 18:58:55 +0000 UTC]

ahah... yeah totally... we put a lot of money in the special effects (fumes...)

danks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fluffyblack [2006-04-13 18:52:06 +0000 UTC]

nice to meet you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to fluffyblack [2006-04-13 18:59:34 +0000 UTC]

well, we're not really "meeting"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffyblack In reply to Gonzale [2006-04-13 19:14:13 +0000 UTC]

haha, this is not real life, is it? we're not talking now eather, relax

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gonzale In reply to fluffyblack [2006-04-13 19:17:36 +0000 UTC]

haha i was just being stupid

👍: 0 ⏩: 0