HOME | DD

gunslinger87 — 'Bull Dog' class 0-8-0t

Published: 2010-10-24 05:21:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 4382; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description The primary motive power for the Dry Gulch & Hellingon Railway are a number of outside frame 2-8-0s similar to the D&RGW's "C-25" class locos.
[link]
Ten such locos were delivered in June of 1901 have been the primary form of mostive power. although the ealier inside frame 2-8-0s, "C-16" types, continued to provide valuable service.

These locomotives have served the DG&H very well and have earned their place as strong and reseliant work-horses. However the Right-of-Way into the high desert mountains and especially Devil's Slot Canyon is increadibly winding and steep. Grades along this part of the railroad average 3%, though they exceed 4% in some ares. This makes this stretch of track quite percarious to traverse, even with the most skilled of engineers at the throttle. Trains that should only require a single locomotive needed to have 2 locomotives, "double heading", in order for the train to crest the grade. Double heading was proving costly for the railroad and a solution was needed.

The result of their problem is pictured above. The famed "Bull Dog" class 0-8-0t helper locomotives. The engines use an identical frame to their 2-8-0 counterparts, but lack the lead wheel. These locomotives were built specifically as "Helper" locomotives to aid trains up, through, and over the treturous grade in Devil's Slot Canyon. A total of four were originally delivered in early spring 1903.

With the large saddle tank and all steel cab these locomotives had considerably more tractive effort than the usual 2-8-0s. They did have a pretty veracious appetite for coal and had aggressive operating characteristics, hence the crewmen nicknaming these locos "Bull Dogs". Each loco's fuel bunker held enough coal for a round trip or two between the bottom of the grade and the crest. Coal was used sparingly while at stops. Crew tried to not use the coal from the bunker except for only traversing the "High Iron". Stoking between runs was performed at the base stations.

For a time these locos performed happily and served specifically as helper locomotives, but as time moved on the Bull dogs occasionally hauled local frieght, ore, and mixed trains along the desert mountains in Arizona.
***********************************************

Ok, enough of the fictional history. Now, BEHOLD MORE OF MY NARROW GAUGE AWESOMENESS!!!!! XDXDXD

As some of you may or may not know, My friend :whaletainer2002: got me the book by Malcom Furlow on how to build the HOn3 "San Juan Central". As such my mind has been geared to HOn3 modeling and I pondered on what motive power I'd like to have on my HOn3 "Dry Gulch & Hellingon Ry".

The locomotive drawn above was directly inspired my the old MDC Roundhouse kit #1550, and and more commonly know as the "Moose Jaws Static Locomotive Kit". (by the way, if you know where I can get one LET ME KNOW!!!)
Ideally I would want 4 of them, 3 to make the 0-8-0 shown and the 4th to make an 0-4-4-0. I'd still have to figure out some way to power them, but NWSL should be able to help me out with that.

Anywho I hope ya'll like!! And Sampug, feel free to pixelize this!
Related content
Comments: 36

steam-dieselpunkpunk [2018-08-02 00:53:50 +0000 UTC]

I just pictured punk kids running away from a this engine but its barking and has a collar around its from coupler

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FreelancedColorado [2016-12-08 00:32:42 +0000 UTC]

Think I would be better off doing an 0-8-0t, 2-8-0t or 0-8-2t with the MDC kit? Just picked one up for $35!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to FreelancedColorado [2017-01-05 05:22:46 +0000 UTC]

The 0-8-0 is what I'm going for. I have a total of three of those MDC kits. I still want to snag one more sometime to make it into a 2-4-4-2T.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FreelancedColorado In reply to gunslinger87 [2017-07-16 03:05:14 +0000 UTC]

Message me if you need the instructions on how to make a 2-4-4-2t I have a copy of them sitting around!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to FreelancedColorado [2017-09-27 04:33:27 +0000 UTC]

Much Obliged, but I managed to find a PDF of the full instructions on building all the kit variations. Thanks for the offer, but I'm good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Engine97 [2014-06-02 20:48:07 +0000 UTC]

Stunning work!!! If I'm ever a bazillionaire, I'm gonna build 4 engines just like this!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to Engine97 [2014-06-04 03:49:24 +0000 UTC]

In real life!?

They'd be interesting to see! That's for sure! Although I've actually started bashing a model of in in HOn3 scale.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Engine97 In reply to gunslinger87 [2014-06-04 20:53:09 +0000 UTC]

You bet they'd be interesting to see! But your design looks amazing!! It's that kind of engine that just looks good pulling anything! When you finish the bash Be sure to show the end result when it's done!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to Engine97 [2014-06-05 19:51:57 +0000 UTC]

Oh I will, I can still work on some external things. Mostly details like piping, air pump, and paint work. The bulk of the remaining work is finding a set of gears and a motor.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MilesWestern [2011-06-23 19:45:07 +0000 UTC]

I was going to say, it strongly resembles that old MDC "Battle Creek" kit, and voila. I'd be nice if Athearn's Roundhouse division had the gumption to produce a DCC/Sound version of this non-op kit.

As for the drawing, strong linework. Seems like something you should send to Narrow Gauge & Shortline Gazette and see if they'd publish it, I'd bet they would.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to MilesWestern [2011-06-27 21:27:24 +0000 UTC]

Well, this is based on one of the old MDC "3-In-1" kits. This one specifically based off of an HOn3 Non operating model. Though it could be made operational fairly easily.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Javajunkie1976 [2011-05-23 00:12:38 +0000 UTC]

Is there a way to add all of your steam locomotives to my favorites?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to Javajunkie1976 [2011-05-23 15:22:08 +0000 UTC]

Um... fave them one by one...?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Atticus-W [2010-10-27 04:53:13 +0000 UTC]

A.J., this is... *explodes*

Lemme just say that I know how Adam feels. O.o

This is pretty much the most perfect narrow gauge loco I’ve seen in recent memory... its symmetry and balance is SUPERB. I even love the contrast between the short and squat steam dome and the tallish sand domes. The cab, bunker, and tank arrangement is wonderfully utilitarian but attractively arranged nonetheless. I’m such a sucker for the vestibule-cab-with-roof-overhanging-the-bunker look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-10-27 20:24:05 +0000 UTC]

Well I'm glad you like it! I'm working on an 0-4-4-0t version of it as well. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to gunslinger87 [2010-10-27 20:31:18 +0000 UTC]

Thankfully I already CAN'T WAIT TO SEE IT.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lordofthetrains [2010-10-26 05:32:03 +0000 UTC]

Kinda reminds me of [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to Lordofthetrains [2010-10-27 20:22:54 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I see the resembalence, only it's an 0-6-2 instead of an 0-8-0. They used the same type of loco in the Details and Ideas section, though they labbled the engine as an "0-8-0t".

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PaxAeternum [2010-10-25 00:35:20 +0000 UTC]

amazing framework, and I love th rough cast counterweights

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to PaxAeternum [2010-10-27 19:55:18 +0000 UTC]

Well, they're not exactly "Rogh Cast", more like "Well Used".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaxAeternum In reply to gunslinger87 [2010-10-27 23:56:15 +0000 UTC]

well unless they are continuously pelted by stones, they wouldnt look like that unless they came from the foundry that way. (or had been rusted ALOT, cleaned, but were pitted)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to PaxAeternum [2010-10-28 01:23:28 +0000 UTC]

Most likely the latter.
The crisp and cleanlyness of the paint work is NOT a huge priority on the DG&H, at leats between 1916 and 1920+.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DraftHorseTrainer [2010-10-24 22:18:14 +0000 UTC]

I have never seen a Loco like this. Its a pretty cool one too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to DraftHorseTrainer [2010-10-27 19:53:58 +0000 UTC]

It's based on an old HOn3 scale MDC kit, sadly no longer in production and hard to find. The loco is not based on any real life prototype.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DraftHorseTrainer In reply to gunslinger87 [2010-10-27 19:59:27 +0000 UTC]

Oh WOW!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

simulatortrain [2010-10-24 19:39:19 +0000 UTC]

All right, quit stealing locos I'd design!

No really, keep it up, it saves me work XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to simulatortrain [2010-10-24 21:17:23 +0000 UTC]

Well I have another one I want to draw. It looks almost identical to this 'un here, only it's a 0-4-4-0.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

simulatortrain In reply to gunslinger87 [2010-10-25 01:52:31 +0000 UTC]

No problem XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sampug394 [2010-10-24 14:13:08 +0000 UTC]

IT'S GOT A CONGDON SMOKESTACK

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

gunslinger87 In reply to Sampug394 [2010-10-28 01:39:38 +0000 UTC]

That's a good thing, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gunslinger87 In reply to Sampug394 [2010-10-24 21:16:30 +0000 UTC]

Indeed it does!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sampug394 [2010-10-24 14:12:56 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to Sampug394 [2010-10-24 21:15:57 +0000 UTC]

What? Is it too much work for you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JoeltheSwedishDragon [2010-10-24 11:17:49 +0000 UTC]

Lookin' gorgeous. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Biotrain [2010-10-24 09:01:35 +0000 UTC]

Would this be a narrow gauge?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to Biotrain [2010-10-24 21:15:15 +0000 UTC]

I do believe I said that in the "Artist's Comments" section.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0