HOME | DD

Lin1130 In reply to Lin1130 [2012-09-18 16:51:28 +0000 UTC]

oops,wrong word anastasia is 4m fox movies,nvm==

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SweetlyPeachy In reply to PrincessMeridaRules [2012-08-23 23:36:52 +0000 UTC]

they arn't disney movies. Brave premiered AFTER the person made this. AND TINKERBELL IS NOT I REPEAT IS NOT A PRINCESS.SHE IS A F A I R Y.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TootsieFlute In reply to Lupilstinskin [2012-08-23 11:07:12 +0000 UTC]

Mulan is listed on Disney as a princess I have researched this...Alice was a princess of heart so she is a guest princess on Disney. Kida isn't listed as one but Pocahontas is. Research it if you wish to argue. There are ten official here in order :Snow white,Cinderella,Aurora,Ariel,Belle,Jasmine,Pocahontas,Mulan,Tiana, and Rapunzel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupilstinskin In reply to TootsieFlute [2012-08-23 23:27:29 +0000 UTC]

Jejejeje, c'mon, there is no need to react like that. I´m talking based exclusively what was presented in the Disney version of the stories, IN THE MOVIES (no games, series, web list, trade marks, the original stories in which they based on, etc.).
I understand why they don´t listed Kida despite the fact that she was the princess of Altantis, with royal lineage of centuries; it was because she is not the "right type of princess"; "Dinsey Princess" as a Trade Mark includes the list you mention, but it is a matter of marketing. For example they needed a princess for the "asian girls" (even if Jasmin already is asian because she was born in Asia), so they include Mulan in the club, but she refused the offering of the Emperor to be part of his council, and returned to home to be a "normal girl and fullfil her duty as a daughter".
The reality is that they are looking for sales, but in your case I thought that you were looking for something different that the "Disney Princess mythology", and that was the reason you included real princess as Pocahontas, Kira and Eilonwy.
If we look for justification, even Jane should be a princess because she married Tarzan the "prince" and then "king" of gorillas. Or Megara in the festival is named or referred to as the "Princess of the Gypsies".
The point is that a girl or a Disney heroine does not have to be a princess to be important, but the sad reality has shown that is her popularity and sales capacity what determines whether or not a female character is included in that category by the company itself.
I suggest to you clarify what were your criteria for determining to whom you consider princesses and why, it would save you a lot of comments that might bother you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SweetlyPeachy In reply to KitsukiNekogin [2012-08-23 23:34:55 +0000 UTC]

Esmeralda is NOT a princess. and Kiari dosen't have the right to be in here in the first place. she's owned by Square Enix.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KitsukiNekogin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-24 07:43:52 +0000 UTC]

she may not be an actually princess but she is the princess of the gypsies and this film, much the same way that Alice in NOT a princess!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to KitsukiNekogin [2012-08-24 10:58:47 +0000 UTC]

no. she isn't she's the main attraction of the Gypsys. NOT a princess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KitsukiNekogin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-24 15:40:57 +0000 UTC]

Ok, if this is supposed to be only actual princesses then by that right Mulan should not be up there, nor should Alice or Megara!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to KitsukiNekogin [2012-08-24 15:44:15 +0000 UTC]

that is correct.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KitsukiNekogin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-25 06:49:54 +0000 UTC]

so why are they up and not Esmeralda?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to KitsukiNekogin [2012-08-25 12:03:06 +0000 UTC]

because that's what they chose as disney "princesses"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KitsukiNekogin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-25 19:26:34 +0000 UTC]

what who chose? You took it from a list or something?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to KitsukiNekogin [2012-08-25 20:11:59 +0000 UTC]

uhm.. wow how old are you? I think you really need to learn how this site works.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KitsukiNekogin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-25 20:15:22 +0000 UTC]

I happen to be 23 years old, how old are you cuz what ever your age I think you should go back to school to learn how to spell credits!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to KitsukiNekogin [2012-08-25 20:19:25 +0000 UTC]

I'm spelling everything correctly. "Cuz" is NOT a properly spelled word. Neither is "What ever" it's whatever.

I am in school taking 3 AP English courses. Thank you for the opinion though. and obviously since you do not understand that I am NOT the one who created this then I must inform you that whoever posted this picture created it. I had no say in what characters they picked or why they picked them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KitsukiNekogin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-25 21:54:23 +0000 UTC]

Ok look, obviously we got off on the wrong foot, here. I will admit that I did not pay close enough attention to realize that you were just replying to my comment. I assumed that you were the artist because you defended the choice of princesses. Anyway, I know "cuz" is not a word but it is slang and a shortened term for "because". I when i said that thing about going back to school I was referring to the fact that the word "credits" in the description was spelled "cridets" which is not how it is spelled. I am sorry for saying things like I did but also, I must point out that you were the first to throw a punch, I merely defended my self.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SweetlyPeachy In reply to EspioArtwork31 [2012-08-23 23:34:07 +0000 UTC]

TINK ISN'T A PRINCESS!!! SHES A FAIRY!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

belianis In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-05-19 18:14:55 +0000 UTC]

She becomes a queen of chess in THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS.
Look for her coat of arms in my profile.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to belianis [2012-05-19 20:40:27 +0000 UTC]

but that's Carol's ORGIGINAL STORY!. ..not Disney's TAKE on it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupilstinskin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-23 23:30:18 +0000 UTC]

Exactly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to Lupilstinskin [2012-08-23 23:33:47 +0000 UTC]

? -.-i'm confused.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupilstinskin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-23 23:36:57 +0000 UTC]

That Alice is not a princess, not in the Disney version of the story.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to Lupilstinskin [2012-08-23 23:38:54 +0000 UTC]

oh yay you agree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupilstinskin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-23 23:39:06 +0000 UTC]

YEp

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SweetlyPeachy In reply to Lupilstinskin [2012-08-23 23:40:31 +0000 UTC]

x.x i'm getting tired of this argument.. why do people try to insist characters who are borrowed from other stories are princesses?? Like tinkerbell! and wendy!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupilstinskin In reply to SweetlyPeachy [2012-08-25 15:28:50 +0000 UTC]

jejeje yep I undertand what your saying, and I agree with you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ScreamxStrawberries In reply to aawhitaker [2011-04-30 15:56:14 +0000 UTC]

as well as Eilonwy. and I'm pretty sure more. Eilonwy is a princess created by Walt Disney from the old movie The Black Cauldron. It's underrated but she is still a "disney princess".

👍: 0 ⏩: 0