Comments: 7
Coelophysis [2014-09-14 07:04:06 +0000 UTC]
Bruno was tried and put to death for his heretical theological and philosophical views. His scientific insights weren't even what riled the church at the time (and neither did Galileo's for that matter). Like Hypatia and Galileo, he's been inappropriately recast as a martyr for science among the pantheon of saints in atheist mythology.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Netufi [2011-09-22 01:30:42 +0000 UTC]
You know what slowed down our scientific knowledge even further? When Aristarchus developed the heliocentric model, but then Aristotle's geocentric model was more widely accepted because of his reputation. Imagine how far we could have gotten if the heliocentric model was accepted!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jegudiel2013 In reply to Netufi [2012-12-24 01:55:55 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Commenter
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coelophysis In reply to Jegudiel2013 [2014-09-14 06:57:09 +0000 UTC]
The "Dark Ages" weren't even a real thing. The entire notion that the period between antiquity and the Renaissance was a period of intellectual, social, cultural, and scientific stagnation is a myth that has been utterly refuted by modern scholarship. There was plenty of scientific progress during the Middle Ages, and plenty of superstition during the Renaissance and early Modern period. The Renaissance itself was the fruit of the Medieval world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DraskyVanderhoff [2011-09-22 00:30:27 +0000 UTC]
All religions slow our progress that's why we should abolish them or at least give them no power ( "is your shit, don't throw it on us" )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0