Comments: 28
Boniex94 [2015-01-27 10:51:08 +0000 UTC]
that kind of battle can be only seen in warthunder i think. It's becouse of driving system there. In WoT tanks can't "drift"? like a proper tanks. Anyway it's best tank fight i've seen. Got fall in love in Pepperoni XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
history-nerd In reply to Boniex94 [2015-01-27 11:32:55 +0000 UTC]
No, in WoT they can't.
I agree on it being the best!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AndreaSilva60 [2014-12-19 11:38:30 +0000 UTC]
Mitico un semovente da 75/18, ce n'era uno nella caserma dove ho servito, il reggimento Artiglieria a Cavallo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
history-nerd In reply to AndreaSilva60 [2014-12-20 17:17:25 +0000 UTC]
Buono a sapersi!
Mi sembra anche giusto... dopotutto, il Semovente discende direttamente dalle "Voloire", che hanno lasciato la forza animale del cavallo per seguire quella del motore a combustione interna (così si esprimeva un veterano, Davide Beretta, in un suo libro)!
Questa serie non è che sia perfetta, e devo ammettere che in certi episodi certe cosette non mi sono piaciute; però questa parte (che tutti concordano nel definire con una sola parola: "awesome") non è venuta male!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreaSilva60 In reply to history-nerd [2014-12-20 20:22:49 +0000 UTC]
Grande citazione! In effetti ci dissero che parte delle Voloire erano il supporto di artiglieria del 101° Ariete.
Bellissimo il 75/18 su M13, nel suo piccolo era ben riuscito.
Lo stuG III era una passione di quando ero un ragazzino, bizzarro..... , mi ricordo che comprai una monografia su questo semovente, vita morte e miracoli, chissà che fine avrà fatto, l'unica cosa che mi ricordo erano delle gran foto di carri rotti a causa del cedimento delle barre di torsione, e una dotta disquisizione sui motivi della fragilità.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
history-nerd In reply to AndreaSilva60 [2014-12-21 08:40:55 +0000 UTC]
Sì, riuscito è la parola giusta.
Ah, davvero? Soffriva di fragilità alla sospensione? Interessante...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreaSilva60 In reply to history-nerd [2014-12-21 09:43:24 +0000 UTC]
Me ne ricordo perchè ero perplesso da tutte quelle pagine che raffiguravano carri abbandonati, vabbè che dovevano riempire un centinaio di pagine solo con lo StuG, non era facile.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
history-nerd In reply to AndreaSilva60 [2014-12-21 11:06:25 +0000 UTC]
Sono dettagliucci come questi che rendono vive le discussioni!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
guardmn [2014-08-06 19:38:25 +0000 UTC]
No No No,To me its like watching two Gunfighters in the Old West.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
history-nerd In reply to guardmn [2014-08-06 19:47:09 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps, but them gunfighters usually ended their differences in a single shot, didn't they?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SulliMike23 [2014-07-14 17:42:33 +0000 UTC]
This was like watching a sword fight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brigadier-Zod [2014-07-09 21:49:49 +0000 UTC]
Best duel ever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
requin789 [2014-07-08 21:14:40 +0000 UTC]
The stug III is a assault gun , no ? o:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
history-nerd In reply to requin789 [2014-07-09 16:17:14 +0000 UTC]
Well, technically yes, but it glowed the most as a tank destroyer, I think.
Besides, even the Semovente wasn't supposed to be a tank destroyer, but it performed very well in the role.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
requin789 In reply to history-nerd [2014-07-10 14:08:53 +0000 UTC]
Okay , because i watched something called "Greatest tanks battles" and they were talking about the Sturmgeschutz III
Used as a front line vehicule , In the video the guy said that even the commander died from soviet artillerie fire
He have the same gun that the Panzer Kmpfw Iv , It was just re-adapted for the Stug III ...
But same perfomance ...
Probebly cause of the gun it wasn't count as a Tank detroyer ? o:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Novaprime12 In reply to requin789 [2014-07-10 15:53:22 +0000 UTC]
The stug is a panzer 3. The turret ring was too small for a long 75 like the pak 40 on hippo team. So thus the stug 3 g was made as a tank destroyer, stug 3s before it were anti infantry with short 75 guns armed only with HE shells.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
requin789 In reply to Novaprime12 [2014-07-10 17:55:18 +0000 UTC]
No , the stug III with the 7.5cm L48 was still a Assault gun , Sometime used as a TD , but it's wasn't is main fonction
Even the jagpanzer IV with the 7.5cm L48 was used as a assault gun ...
Only the Jagpanzer IV 7.5cm L70 was a tank destroyer , and obviously cause of the gun ...
And if the Stug III 7.5cm L48 was really a TD
what is the point of sending TD's in the first line ?
Against Soviet artillerie and anti-tank gun ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Novaprime12 In reply to requin789 [2014-07-10 21:11:29 +0000 UTC]
It was classified as a assault gun, but was used a lot as a tank destroyer because of the pak 40
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mickchago [2014-07-08 13:32:21 +0000 UTC]
oh that is cool, i was hoping anizo would field the best Italian AFV of the war, and lets hope that it gets into World of Tanks soon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
history-nerd In reply to Mickchago [2014-07-09 16:18:03 +0000 UTC]
I hope that, too. If those Belarusians get their heads out of wherever they got them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0