Comments: 27
InfectedTragedy [2009-06-21 17:31:38 +0000 UTC]
My eyes, my tainted eyes.
Haha. Funny.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheToy [2009-06-20 23:12:07 +0000 UTC]
You have burned thine eyes!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AspartameDeath [2009-06-20 15:52:09 +0000 UTC]
DEAR LORD AMAZING
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Blu-Hue [2009-06-20 15:40:24 +0000 UTC]
LOL! he's kinda chunky looking! xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Toadster26 [2009-06-20 05:31:08 +0000 UTC]
YES. JUST YES.
I totally woke everybody up in the house laughing at that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ImagineTheEnding In reply to Toadster26 [2009-06-20 05:38:10 +0000 UTC]
Wow, I JUST realized you were Miles. I feel so stupid right now. xDDD!!!
Yeah thanks! You SHOULD wake everyone up with laughter cause that's how comedy works, man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IronRosePetal [2009-06-20 05:07:14 +0000 UTC]
LOL
your inking is awesome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Llian [2009-06-20 02:38:17 +0000 UTC]
LOL I burst'd into laughter while reading that. Nice job, I especially like the background.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Elf-chuchu [2009-06-19 20:19:34 +0000 UTC]
|D;.... lol...........
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Imaginaricide [2009-06-19 17:36:56 +0000 UTC]
Ah, I do so love Wesker.
Well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mojogroupie [2009-06-19 15:16:05 +0000 UTC]
ahahahahah aOMG THIS ROCKS XD heheheeeeheee its wonderful XD -cries-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AnnaKlava [2009-06-19 10:53:15 +0000 UTC]
This is fucking hilarious I love it! Very awesome inking and proportions. The only gripe I have about it is the split panels on Wesker's face, like =chiiildd said it right. I know you were going for that sequential look but it just makes his face look longer and unnecessary.
You did such a good job otherwise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ImagineTheEnding In reply to AnnaKlava [2009-06-19 18:58:56 +0000 UTC]
Oh really? The split face thing was a new thing I wanted to try. I guess it failed this time, but next time I'll try to get it right.
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jenovita [2009-06-19 09:32:30 +0000 UTC]
Lol!!! xDDD nice!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chiiildd [2009-06-19 08:41:37 +0000 UTC]
The split panels of his face (panels 3 and 4) don't really work for me. If there'd been a noticeable change in the image (like if the shot of the mouth was more close-up then the eye shot) then maybe I'd like it more, but as it is, it looks like it's just been done for the sake of doing something. It's conveying no reason. It's pointless.
That's what I see though- maybe you did it for a reason.
Which begs the question:
...Was there a reason for splitting that one shot into two panels?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ImagineTheEnding In reply to chiiildd [2009-06-19 19:01:19 +0000 UTC]
Mainly I did the two panels to try something new. I wanted to convey the feeling that you saw his eyes and then his mouth. However, I came into a problem when I had to insert quotes. Right when I realized there was no way I would have room...then the idea just kind of failed. Next time I'll try something else to do the split paneling correctly.
Thanks for the critique. I appreciate it, especially since this was a practice comic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chiiildd In reply to ImagineTheEnding [2009-06-20 06:08:10 +0000 UTC]
Nice to know there was a reason for it- and I can't wait to see your next attempt at it, since we all know practice makes perfect.
You're welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nebeaula [2009-06-19 06:14:34 +0000 UTC]
A-mazing!
I laughed so hard. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0