HOME | DD

infamously-dorky — brothers

Published: 2011-07-03 14:39:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 1216; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description Sherlock and Mycroft Holmes. Photoshop used
Related content
Comments: 70

infamously-dorky In reply to ??? [2011-07-24 14:56:24 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

redh2o [2011-07-16 02:28:16 +0000 UTC]

waaaa! the Holmes brothers

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to redh2o [2011-07-16 02:39:24 +0000 UTC]

lol sherlock is my holmes boy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

redh2o In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-16 02:46:13 +0000 UTC]

hahaha! every body love little Sherlock

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to redh2o [2011-07-16 08:23:35 +0000 UTC]

ikr?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

loser018 [2011-07-05 01:51:20 +0000 UTC]

Sherlock had a bro? Wow, bet he feels awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-05 02:42:08 +0000 UTC]

"feels"? this statement concerns me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-05 02:57:23 +0000 UTC]

Why?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-05 03:14:02 +0000 UTC]

nvm. lets just say i hang out with too many perverts. anywho, yes, he is awesome. he has higher deductive abilities then sherlock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-05 03:18:49 +0000 UTC]

Really? Is that possible?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-05 03:22:15 +0000 UTC]

indeed it is

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-05 04:12:22 +0000 UTC]

HOW CAN THIS BEEEEEEE!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-05 15:21:59 +0000 UTC]

lol read the story "the greek interpreter" and you will know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-05 23:39:32 +0000 UTC]

Ah, reading. It's summer. Can't I just wait for the movie?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-06 00:23:30 +0000 UTC]

it has nothing to do with the story and that isnt until december. if you want to see it on youtube, look up "the greek interpreter"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-06 00:37:18 +0000 UTC]

But I'm looking at Ponies!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-06 00:38:43 +0000 UTC]

....no comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-06 00:43:32 +0000 UTC]

What, Bronies to the max!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-06 00:50:26 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-06 00:53:59 +0000 UTC]

Gah, just watch this (there is a clean version if that suites your fancy)

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-06 02:37:46 +0000 UTC]

lol what the hell?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-06 02:50:50 +0000 UTC]

You love it, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-06 03:05:13 +0000 UTC]

yes and no

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-06 03:09:30 +0000 UTC]

What? Why with the confusion of me?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-06 03:33:04 +0000 UTC]

because you do it to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-06 13:55:07 +0000 UTC]

Yes I do. But do you like it or hate it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-06 21:09:37 +0000 UTC]

its meh

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-08 03:37:58 +0000 UTC]

Do you watch MLP?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-08 08:07:37 +0000 UTC]

nope

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loser018 In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-08 12:30:48 +0000 UTC]

It's AMAZING!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to loser018 [2011-07-08 14:40:00 +0000 UTC]

cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Maccasmiz [2011-07-04 14:10:33 +0000 UTC]

I adore how you have put in the Sidney Paget feel in the strokes and background

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to Maccasmiz [2011-07-05 02:42:24 +0000 UTC]

i felt it would be a nice homage

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Victorian-Dandy [2011-07-04 06:43:52 +0000 UTC]

Adore the look on their faces...wonderful work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to Victorian-Dandy [2011-07-04 08:18:23 +0000 UTC]

aww, thanks :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AlienLifeDetected [2011-07-03 23:47:21 +0000 UTC]

I still find it hard to believe that Sherlock has a brother.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to AlienLifeDetected [2011-07-04 08:20:33 +0000 UTC]

you know, in one of the drafts, sherlock had another older brother named sherringford, which was actually going to be the name of sherlock before it was changed. sherringford was suppose to have even higher deductive abilities then both mycroft or sherlock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlienLifeDetected In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-04 15:04:21 +0000 UTC]

Then what happened to him?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to AlienLifeDetected [2011-07-05 02:50:31 +0000 UTC]

like i said, in the drafts meaning never really published. though he was featured in a doctor who story at one point, if my memory serves correct.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlienLifeDetected In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-05 03:01:08 +0000 UTC]

Hm, I guess just win the spotlight. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to AlienLifeDetected [2011-07-05 03:12:24 +0000 UTC]

indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EIRivero [2011-07-03 19:01:07 +0000 UTC]

standing in theleft at 6ft+ tall and at a weight of 135 pounds(very posible) Sherlock holmes, and at the right, at 6ft+ tall and a weight of 240 pounds Mycroft holmes. now in our first contes, can you to gentleman tell who draw this picture?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to EIRivero [2011-07-04 08:21:06 +0000 UTC]

lol idk, can they?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EIRivero In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-04 15:03:24 +0000 UTC]

Holmes: I suspect brother that we, were draw by a girl.
Mycroft: between 16 to 18 probably.
Holmes: art amateur perhaps?
Mycroft: art student, she is an art student brother
Holmesyou won this time) oh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to EIRivero [2011-07-05 02:57:31 +0000 UTC]

lol right on all counts only for mycroft's first deduction. he is deadly close, but my age isnt in that span.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EIRivero In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-05 16:35:58 +0000 UTC]

well, he had the disvantage of cant see you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to EIRivero [2011-07-05 16:40:24 +0000 UTC]

true, very true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EIRivero In reply to infamously-dorky [2011-07-06 23:19:11 +0000 UTC]

yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

infamously-dorky In reply to EIRivero [2011-07-07 00:24:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

theorangecrow [2011-07-03 14:41:50 +0000 UTC]

XD sherlock's expression...XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>